Records of engagement and decision making for environmental and socio-ecological challenges

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Kristan Cockerill , Pierre Glynn , Ilan Chabay , Mahmud Farooque , RaimoP. Hämäläinen , Ben Miyamoto , Patricia McKay
{"title":"Records of engagement and decision making for environmental and socio-ecological challenges","authors":"Kristan Cockerill ,&nbsp;Pierre Glynn ,&nbsp;Ilan Chabay ,&nbsp;Mahmud Farooque ,&nbsp;RaimoP. Hämäläinen ,&nbsp;Ben Miyamoto ,&nbsp;Patricia McKay","doi":"10.1007/s40070-019-00104-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We propose creating and maintaining records of engagement and decision-making (RoED) to help us and our communities better understand ourselves, our goals, our decisions, and the dynamic systems in which we all live. The purpose of RoED is to go well beyond noting that dialogue occurred or a decision was reached. The records should, in ways appropriate to the context and participants, document interactions and note biases, beliefs, emotions, behaviors, norms, and values. These crucial aspects are generally absent in academic papers and formal reports, yet they always play a role in decision-making processes. While not a panacea for addressing critical biophysical and social challenges, we propose that a comprehensive framework for promoting realistic, legitimate and inclusive engagement could enhance trust, establish institutional memory, and when and where appropriate, ensure greater transparency. The aim is to create and maintain RoED to collect significant information and share insights from multi-stakeholder decision-making processes from diverse institutions, contexts, and disciplinary domains. In the long-term RoED could promote more effective adaptive management or governance approaches. This paper describes an exploratory phase intended to catalyze collaborative efforts worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44104,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40070-019-00104-6","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943821001072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

We propose creating and maintaining records of engagement and decision-making (RoED) to help us and our communities better understand ourselves, our goals, our decisions, and the dynamic systems in which we all live. The purpose of RoED is to go well beyond noting that dialogue occurred or a decision was reached. The records should, in ways appropriate to the context and participants, document interactions and note biases, beliefs, emotions, behaviors, norms, and values. These crucial aspects are generally absent in academic papers and formal reports, yet they always play a role in decision-making processes. While not a panacea for addressing critical biophysical and social challenges, we propose that a comprehensive framework for promoting realistic, legitimate and inclusive engagement could enhance trust, establish institutional memory, and when and where appropriate, ensure greater transparency. The aim is to create and maintain RoED to collect significant information and share insights from multi-stakeholder decision-making processes from diverse institutions, contexts, and disciplinary domains. In the long-term RoED could promote more effective adaptive management or governance approaches. This paper describes an exploratory phase intended to catalyze collaborative efforts worldwide.

应对环境和社会生态挑战的参与和决策记录
我们建议创建和维护参与和决策记录(RoED),以帮助我们和我们的社区更好地了解我们自己、我们的目标、我们的决策以及我们所生活的动态系统。RoED的目的是远远超出注意对话发生或决定达成。记录应以适合上下文和参与者的方式,记录互动并注意偏见、信仰、情感、行为、规范和价值观。这些关键的方面在学术论文和正式报告中通常是缺席的,但它们总是在决策过程中发挥作用。虽然这不是解决重大生物物理和社会挑战的灵丹妙药,但我们建议建立一个促进现实、合法和包容参与的全面框架,以增强信任,建立制度记忆,并在适当的时候和地点确保更大的透明度。其目的是创建和维护RoED,以收集重要信息,并分享来自不同机构、背景和学科领域的多方利益相关者决策过程的见解。从长期来看,RoED可以促进更有效的适应性管理或治理方法。本文描述了一个旨在促进全球合作努力的探索阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信