{"title":"The Unpredictable Lightness of History in Nicolas Cavaillès’ Novellas on the Mauritius Islands","authors":"F. Novac","doi":"10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nicolas Cavaillès ponders on a philosophy of history mixed with humour and irony in his historical narratives of remote islands in the Indian Ocean in two of his novellas: Life of Mr. Legaut (the story of a Huguenot who is forced to leave his native France and travels to these islands) and The Dead on the Donkey, where the wanderings of un unfortunate donkey across the Mauritius Island allow the narrator to relate the history of the island and its tragic trajectory to modernity. The idea of Western history as progressive evolution is rolled upside down with irony in Cavaillès's philosophical reflection on the circumstances leading to colonial expeditions in Life of Mr. Leguat (2013) and in the successive destruction of the Mauritius Island in the novella The Dead on the Donkey (2018). If Cavaillès builds his books hermeneutically, he also defies hermeneutics by denying all forms of possible understanding of the events described. The actions of his protagonists, human or animal, are the result of circumstances that are well known, but so absurd that they cannot form a historical narrative. If they did, this narrative would look like a hybrid of Beckett's absurd and Cioran's despair. Anti-Hegelian, since history here does not lead to individual freedom, Cavaillès's conception of history equally challenges Nietzsche's representation of unhistorical temporality in an attempt to solve humanity’s relation to the past for enacting a more desirable future. In far away Edenic islands, colonized by powerful states and inhabited by human and animal slaves, no philosophy could make sense of history.","PeriodicalId":42347,"journal":{"name":"Theory in Action","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory in Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nicolas Cavaillès ponders on a philosophy of history mixed with humour and irony in his historical narratives of remote islands in the Indian Ocean in two of his novellas: Life of Mr. Legaut (the story of a Huguenot who is forced to leave his native France and travels to these islands) and The Dead on the Donkey, where the wanderings of un unfortunate donkey across the Mauritius Island allow the narrator to relate the history of the island and its tragic trajectory to modernity. The idea of Western history as progressive evolution is rolled upside down with irony in Cavaillès's philosophical reflection on the circumstances leading to colonial expeditions in Life of Mr. Leguat (2013) and in the successive destruction of the Mauritius Island in the novella The Dead on the Donkey (2018). If Cavaillès builds his books hermeneutically, he also defies hermeneutics by denying all forms of possible understanding of the events described. The actions of his protagonists, human or animal, are the result of circumstances that are well known, but so absurd that they cannot form a historical narrative. If they did, this narrative would look like a hybrid of Beckett's absurd and Cioran's despair. Anti-Hegelian, since history here does not lead to individual freedom, Cavaillès's conception of history equally challenges Nietzsche's representation of unhistorical temporality in an attempt to solve humanity’s relation to the past for enacting a more desirable future. In far away Edenic islands, colonized by powerful states and inhabited by human and animal slaves, no philosophy could make sense of history.
Nicolas Cavaillès在他的两部中篇小说《Legaut先生的一生》(一个胡格诺派教徒被迫离开祖国法国前往这些岛屿的故事)和《驴上的死人》中,在他对印度洋偏远岛屿的历史叙述中,思考了一种幽默和讽刺交织的历史哲学,在那里,一头不幸的驴子在毛里求斯岛上游荡,使叙述者能够将该岛的历史及其悲剧轨迹与现代性联系起来。Cavaillès在《Leguat先生的一生》(2013)中对导致殖民探险的环境进行了哲学反思,并在中篇小说《驴上的死人》(2018)中对毛里求斯岛的连续破坏进行了哲学思考,将西方历史视为渐进进化的观点与讽刺相颠倒。如果Cavaillès以解释学的方式构建他的书,他也通过否认对所描述的事件的所有形式的可能理解来挑战解释学。他的主人公,无论是人还是动物,他们的行为都是众所周知的环境的结果,但它们是如此荒谬,以至于无法形成历史叙事。如果他们真的这样做了,这种叙事将看起来像是贝克特的荒谬和西奥兰的绝望的混合体。反黑格尔主义,由于这里的历史并不能带来个人自由,Cavaillès的历史观同样挑战了尼采对非历史暂时性的表述,试图解决人类与过去的关系,以创造一个更美好的未来。在遥远的伊甸岛上,被强大的国家殖民,居住着人类和动物奴隶,没有任何哲学能够理解历史。