Myth, Social Identification and Commodification (Meta Synthesis On Dreadlocks Research Dieng, Central Java)

Marwan Mahmudi, Haekal Fajri Amrullah, N. ., Hadi Surantio
{"title":"Myth, Social Identification and Commodification (Meta Synthesis On Dreadlocks Research Dieng, Central Java)","authors":"Marwan Mahmudi, Haekal Fajri Amrullah, N. ., Hadi Surantio","doi":"10.30880/jts.2022.14.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study departs from 19 research findings with the same subject, namely Dieng dreadlocks discussing the concepts of myth, social identity, and commodification from the perspective or paradigms of each researcher. This is certainly interesting to be meta-synthesized in finding the uniqueness of each of these converged concepts. The general purpose of the research was to find similarities and differences in the findings presented. In particular, the purpose of this study was to explain a comprehensive understanding of myths, social identity, and the commodification of Dieng dreadlocks. The concept presented discussed myth, social identity, and commodification. Myth is a series of stories, which may or may not have a basis in origin and may not, which then emerge and last for a long time because they are constantly discussed and remembered in certain societies. Social identity is something that relates to the individual knowledge of certain social groups and to the emotions and judgments caused by members of that group. Commodification is the transformation of use value into exchange value. The research method used was meta-synthesis, namely literature review research where qualitative techniques are used to combine similar primary data to get a new understanding of the issues raised. The use of the meta-synthesis method is to compile findings and to enable the development of new concepts or theories about myths, social identity, and commodification of Dieng dreadlocks. Data were collected using a purposive sampling technique by taking into account quality research results presented in e-journals and institutional/university repositories through the google search engine. The research findings showed that myths and social identities are transformed into commodification when the government includes them on the tourism agenda because rituals that were originally free of economic value have now become of high economic value and become a major tourism asset in the tourism industry in the Dieng Plateau.","PeriodicalId":30344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of TechnoSocial","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of TechnoSocial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30880/jts.2022.14.01.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study departs from 19 research findings with the same subject, namely Dieng dreadlocks discussing the concepts of myth, social identity, and commodification from the perspective or paradigms of each researcher. This is certainly interesting to be meta-synthesized in finding the uniqueness of each of these converged concepts. The general purpose of the research was to find similarities and differences in the findings presented. In particular, the purpose of this study was to explain a comprehensive understanding of myths, social identity, and the commodification of Dieng dreadlocks. The concept presented discussed myth, social identity, and commodification. Myth is a series of stories, which may or may not have a basis in origin and may not, which then emerge and last for a long time because they are constantly discussed and remembered in certain societies. Social identity is something that relates to the individual knowledge of certain social groups and to the emotions and judgments caused by members of that group. Commodification is the transformation of use value into exchange value. The research method used was meta-synthesis, namely literature review research where qualitative techniques are used to combine similar primary data to get a new understanding of the issues raised. The use of the meta-synthesis method is to compile findings and to enable the development of new concepts or theories about myths, social identity, and commodification of Dieng dreadlocks. Data were collected using a purposive sampling technique by taking into account quality research results presented in e-journals and institutional/university repositories through the google search engine. The research findings showed that myths and social identities are transformed into commodification when the government includes them on the tourism agenda because rituals that were originally free of economic value have now become of high economic value and become a major tourism asset in the tourism industry in the Dieng Plateau.
神话、社会认同和商业化(爪哇中部迪昂Dreadlocks研究的Meta Synthesis)
本研究偏离了同一主题的19项研究发现,即Dieng辫子从每个研究者的角度或范式讨论了神话、社会身份和商品化的概念。在发现这些聚合概念中的每一个的唯一性时,元综合无疑是有趣的。这项研究的总体目的是找出所提出的研究结果的相似之处和差异之处。特别是,这项研究的目的是解释对神话、社会身份和迪昂辫子商品化的全面理解。提出的概念讨论了神话、社会身份和商品化。神话是一系列的故事,它们可能有起源的基础,也可能没有,然后出现并持续很长时间,因为它们在某些社会中不断被讨论和记住。社会认同是与某些社会群体的个人知识以及该群体成员所引起的情绪和判断有关的东西。商品化是使用价值向交换价值的转化。所使用的研究方法是元综合,即文献综述研究,其中使用定性技术结合相似的原始数据,以对提出的问题有新的理解。元综合法的使用是为了汇编研究结果,并使关于迪昂辫子的神话、社会身份和商品化的新概念或理论得以发展。数据是通过有目的的抽样技术收集的,考虑到通过谷歌搜索引擎在电子期刊和机构/大学存储库中呈现的高质量研究结果。研究结果表明,当政府将神话和社会身份列入旅游议程时,它们就会转化为商品化,因为原本没有经济价值的仪式现在已经具有很高的经济价值,并成为迪昂高原旅游业的主要旅游资产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信