Zainabu Tumwebaze, J. Bananuka, T. Kaawaase, Caroline Tirisa Bonareri, Fred Mutesasira
{"title":"Audit committee effectiveness, internal audit function and sustainability reporting practices","authors":"Zainabu Tumwebaze, J. Bananuka, T. Kaawaase, Caroline Tirisa Bonareri, Fred Mutesasira","doi":"10.1108/ajar-03-2021-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the association between audit committee effectiveness (ACE), internal audit function (IAF) and sustainability reporting practices.Design/methodology/approachUsing a cross-sectional and correlational design, useable questionnaires were received from 48 financial services firms in Uganda. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences.Findingsresults indicate that ACE and IAF are positively and significantly associated with sustainability reporting practices. ACE and IAF are more significantly associated with economic and social indicators than environmental sustainability indicators.Research limitations/implicationsIn terms of practice, it is no longer a matter of having internal auditors and audit committees in place but rather those who are mindful of the welfare of society and the natural environment. The effectiveness of the board audit committee and a functioning internal audit can be assessed in terms of their recommendations and decisions regarding improvements in the welfare of society and the natural environment in addition to the traditionally known performance benchmarks.Practical implicationsThe study focuses on only financial services firms in Uganda, and this is a small sample. Future studies may focus on larger samples to enable comparison of the results.Originality/valueThis study provides insights on the initial understanding of the association between ACE, IAF and sustainability reporting practices using evidence from a developing African country – Uganda.","PeriodicalId":33161,"journal":{"name":"AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-03-2021-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the association between audit committee effectiveness (ACE), internal audit function (IAF) and sustainability reporting practices.Design/methodology/approachUsing a cross-sectional and correlational design, useable questionnaires were received from 48 financial services firms in Uganda. The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences.Findingsresults indicate that ACE and IAF are positively and significantly associated with sustainability reporting practices. ACE and IAF are more significantly associated with economic and social indicators than environmental sustainability indicators.Research limitations/implicationsIn terms of practice, it is no longer a matter of having internal auditors and audit committees in place but rather those who are mindful of the welfare of society and the natural environment. The effectiveness of the board audit committee and a functioning internal audit can be assessed in terms of their recommendations and decisions regarding improvements in the welfare of society and the natural environment in addition to the traditionally known performance benchmarks.Practical implicationsThe study focuses on only financial services firms in Uganda, and this is a small sample. Future studies may focus on larger samples to enable comparison of the results.Originality/valueThis study provides insights on the initial understanding of the association between ACE, IAF and sustainability reporting practices using evidence from a developing African country – Uganda.
目的本研究旨在探讨审计委员会效能(ACE)、内部审计职能(IAF)与可持续发展报告实务之间的关系。设计/方法/方法采用横断面和相关设计,从乌干达的48家金融服务公司收到了可用的问卷。使用Statistical Package for Social Sciences对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,ACE和IAF与可持续发展报告实践呈正相关。ACE和IAF与经济和社会指标的关系比与环境可持续性指标的关系更为显著。在实践方面,这不再是内部审计师和审计委员会的问题,而是那些关注社会福利和自然环境的人的问题。除了传统上已知的业绩基准外,还可以根据其关于改善社会福利和自然环境的建议和决定来评估董事会审计委员会和运作良好的内部审计的有效性。实际意义这项研究只关注乌干达的金融服务公司,这是一个小样本。未来的研究可能会集中在更大的样本上,以便对结果进行比较。原创性/价值本研究使用来自发展中非洲国家乌干达的证据,提供了对ACE、IAF和可持续发展报告实践之间关系的初步理解的见解。