Liberalismo igualitário e estrutura do direito privado

L. Zanitelli
{"title":"Liberalismo igualitário e estrutura do direito privado","authors":"L. Zanitelli","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article outlines the thesis that egalitarian liberalism (EL) may require certain structural features of private law (PL). These characteristics would be necessary if egalitarian liberal institutions were to remain sensitive to what Nagel (1991) refers to as a personal point of view. Even if the basic freedoms that EL treats as priorities are parsimonious in relation to property and that institutional conformity to one or more principles of distributive justice (what the article calls “egalitarian demand”) threatens to “disfigure it”, PL would maintain, under EL, a non-contingent status. Regarding method, the article is characterized as an “internal” investigation of EL, which accepts some of its basic premises (such as the priority of basic freedoms and distributive justice) to deal with the place of private law in this tradition.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"41 1","pages":"202-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p202","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article outlines the thesis that egalitarian liberalism (EL) may require certain structural features of private law (PL). These characteristics would be necessary if egalitarian liberal institutions were to remain sensitive to what Nagel (1991) refers to as a personal point of view. Even if the basic freedoms that EL treats as priorities are parsimonious in relation to property and that institutional conformity to one or more principles of distributive justice (what the article calls “egalitarian demand”) threatens to “disfigure it”, PL would maintain, under EL, a non-contingent status. Regarding method, the article is characterized as an “internal” investigation of EL, which accepts some of its basic premises (such as the priority of basic freedoms and distributive justice) to deal with the place of private law in this tradition.
平等主义自由主义与私法结构
本文概述了平等主义自由主义(EL)可能需要私法(PL)的某些结构特征的论点。如果平等主义的自由主义制度要对内格尔(1991)所说的个人观点保持敏感,这些特征将是必要的。即使被自由主义视为优先事项的基本自由相对于财产而言是吝啬的,而且符合一个或多个分配正义原则的制度(文章称之为“平等主义要求”)有可能“破坏它”,在自由主义下,自由主义将保持一种非偶然的地位。就方法而言,本文的特点是对法学的“内部”考察,它接受其一些基本前提(如基本自由和分配正义的优先权)来处理私法在这一传统中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信