The proposed scoring system for hospitalization or discharge of patients with COVID-19

Q3 Nursing
E. Noori, M. Vahedian, S. Rezvan, Neda Minaei, Reihane Tabaraii
{"title":"The proposed scoring system for hospitalization or discharge of patients with COVID-19","authors":"E. Noori, M. Vahedian, S. Rezvan, Neda Minaei, Reihane Tabaraii","doi":"10.34172/JEPT.2021.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the triage of patients diagnosed with corona virus has been a very important issue. The aim of this study was to introduce a triage scoring system according to the clinical and para-clinical findings of patients in order to be admitted or discharged with COVID-19. Methods: After confirming the positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for patients, we used a scoring system which included: the age of patient (less than 40 years and>40 years), early vital signs at the time of admission, lab tests including C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count (WBC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, chest imaging findings, comorbidity and shortness of breath. Results: The clinical score obtained for each variable in this scoring system was a number between 0 and 3. The total score was a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 17. A higher score indicated an increase in the intensity and the need for intensive care. These scores were classified into 3 groups: 0-4, 5-10 and above 10. In the next stage, patients were divided into three groups: mild, moderate and severe. In this regard, patients with mild symptoms were suggested to receive home quarantine and home treatment, patients with moderate symptoms were recommended hospitalization and medical care, and finally patients with severe symptoms were inclined to intensive care. Conclusion: In order to treat and manage patients with COVID-19, it is necessary to pay particular attention to clinical and para-clinical findings and prioritize these findings based on the severity and the condition of patients.","PeriodicalId":36499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/JEPT.2021.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the triage of patients diagnosed with corona virus has been a very important issue. The aim of this study was to introduce a triage scoring system according to the clinical and para-clinical findings of patients in order to be admitted or discharged with COVID-19. Methods: After confirming the positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for patients, we used a scoring system which included: the age of patient (less than 40 years and>40 years), early vital signs at the time of admission, lab tests including C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count (WBC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, chest imaging findings, comorbidity and shortness of breath. Results: The clinical score obtained for each variable in this scoring system was a number between 0 and 3. The total score was a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 17. A higher score indicated an increase in the intensity and the need for intensive care. These scores were classified into 3 groups: 0-4, 5-10 and above 10. In the next stage, patients were divided into three groups: mild, moderate and severe. In this regard, patients with mild symptoms were suggested to receive home quarantine and home treatment, patients with moderate symptoms were recommended hospitalization and medical care, and finally patients with severe symptoms were inclined to intensive care. Conclusion: In order to treat and manage patients with COVID-19, it is necessary to pay particular attention to clinical and para-clinical findings and prioritize these findings based on the severity and the condition of patients.
新冠肺炎患者住院或出院的拟议评分系统
目的:自2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)爆发以来,确诊为冠状病毒的患者的分诊一直是一个非常重要的问题。本研究的目的是根据新冠肺炎患者的临床和临床旁发现引入分诊评分系统,以便入院或出院。方法:在确认患者聚合酶链式反应(PCR)检测呈阳性后,我们使用了一个评分系统,该系统包括:患者年龄(小于40岁和>40岁)、入院时的早期生命体征、实验室检测,包括C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞计数(WBC)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、D-二聚体、胸部影像学检查结果、合并症和呼吸急促。结果:在该评分系统中,每个变量的临床得分都在0到3之间。总分最低为0分,最高为17分。得分越高,表示强度增加,需要重症监护。将这些分数分为3组:0-4分、5-10分和10分以上。在下一阶段,患者被分为三组:轻度、中度和重度。对此,建议症状较轻的患者接受居家隔离和居家治疗,建议症状中等的患者住院治疗和医疗护理,最终症状较重的患者倾向于重症监护。结论:为了治疗和管理新冠肺炎患者,有必要特别关注临床和临床旁发现,并根据患者的严重程度和病情优先考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信