The coupling of project delivery methods and contract strategies for public building projects in Ethiopia

IF 3.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Abayneh Legesse, A. Nejat, T. Ghebrab
{"title":"The coupling of project delivery methods and contract strategies for public building projects in Ethiopia","authors":"Abayneh Legesse, A. Nejat, T. Ghebrab","doi":"10.1108/ci-02-2022-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to use Delphi technique to assess the applicability of coupling various project delivery methods (PDMs) and contract strategies (CSs) for delivery of public building projects (PBP) in Ethiopia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo achieve the objective of this research, an online Delphi study was designed, conducted and analyzed using various statistical procedures. Results were compared to CII’s project delivery and CS (PDCS) tool, a US-based PDM selection tool.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study converged in the third round signifying a consensus on the importance of design–build and construction manager at risk as alternatives to design–bid–build. In addition, “controlling schedule growth” was deemed to be a major performance measure that needs to be considered for PBP in Ethiopia, a result consistent with the outcomes from CII’s PDCS tool.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAmong existing studies, none to the best of the authors’ knowledge has focused on a holistic approach to identify the most appropriate pairings of PDMs and CSs for PBP which was critically needed due to the magnitude and high stakes of these projects. This research is a steppingstone toward gaining knowledge on how to approach these types of projects in fast-growing environments thirsty for new building projects such as in Ethiopia.\n","PeriodicalId":45580,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation-England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-02-2022-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use Delphi technique to assess the applicability of coupling various project delivery methods (PDMs) and contract strategies (CSs) for delivery of public building projects (PBP) in Ethiopia. Design/methodology/approach To achieve the objective of this research, an online Delphi study was designed, conducted and analyzed using various statistical procedures. Results were compared to CII’s project delivery and CS (PDCS) tool, a US-based PDM selection tool. Findings This study converged in the third round signifying a consensus on the importance of design–build and construction manager at risk as alternatives to design–bid–build. In addition, “controlling schedule growth” was deemed to be a major performance measure that needs to be considered for PBP in Ethiopia, a result consistent with the outcomes from CII’s PDCS tool. Originality/value Among existing studies, none to the best of the authors’ knowledge has focused on a holistic approach to identify the most appropriate pairings of PDMs and CSs for PBP which was critically needed due to the magnitude and high stakes of these projects. This research is a steppingstone toward gaining knowledge on how to approach these types of projects in fast-growing environments thirsty for new building projects such as in Ethiopia.
埃塞俄比亚公共建筑项目交付方式与合同策略的耦合
本文的目的是使用德尔菲技术来评估埃塞俄比亚公共建筑项目(PBP)交付中耦合各种项目交付方法(pdm)和合同策略(CSs)的适用性。设计/方法学/方法为了实现本研究的目的,设计了一项在线德尔菲研究,并使用各种统计程序进行了分析。将结果与CII的项目交付和CS (PDCS)工具(一种基于美国的PDM选择工具)进行比较。本研究在第三轮得出结论,标志着对设计-建造和施工管理风险的重要性达成共识,作为设计-投标-建造的替代方案。此外,“控制进度增长”被认为是埃塞俄比亚PBP需要考虑的主要绩效指标,这一结果与CII的PDCS工具的结果一致。原创性/价值在现有的研究中,据作者所知,没有一个研究集中在一个整体的方法上,以确定PBP中最合适的pdm和CSs配对,由于这些项目的规模和高风险,这是非常需要的。这项研究是获得如何在埃塞俄比亚等急需新建筑项目的快速增长环境中处理这些类型项目的知识的踏脚石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction Innovation-England
Construction Innovation-England CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信