“We all have Regrets; it doesn’t Mean we are Failures”: Rejecting or Regretting Motherhood

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
M. Johnson, G. Pétursdóttir
{"title":"“We all have Regrets; it doesn’t Mean we are Failures”: Rejecting or Regretting Motherhood","authors":"M. Johnson, G. Pétursdóttir","doi":"10.1177/0192513x231181376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A woman’s choice to remain childfree is often met with disapproving comments. This article focuses on pronatalism and the social discourse that promotes and maintains motherhood as the preferred choice for women in a country that has achieved high levels of gender equality. Critical discourse analysis is applied to 30 qualitative interviews with women, trans, and non-binary people in Iceland, who are either childfree by choice or who regret motherhood. The results indicate that despite neoliberalism advocating a woman’s right to freedom of choice, pronatalist ideologies continue to undermine reproductive self-determination, promoting motherhood as the right choice. Unsolicited comments act as powerful mechanisms that serve to shame those who can bear children into becoming mothers or facing regret yet simultaneously condemn women who regret motherhood. Women who choose to remain childfree privately challenge unwanted comments by overturning pronatalist discourses, whereas those who regret their choice to become mothers struggle to express their feelings for fear of being judged and branded as failures.","PeriodicalId":48283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x231181376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A woman’s choice to remain childfree is often met with disapproving comments. This article focuses on pronatalism and the social discourse that promotes and maintains motherhood as the preferred choice for women in a country that has achieved high levels of gender equality. Critical discourse analysis is applied to 30 qualitative interviews with women, trans, and non-binary people in Iceland, who are either childfree by choice or who regret motherhood. The results indicate that despite neoliberalism advocating a woman’s right to freedom of choice, pronatalist ideologies continue to undermine reproductive self-determination, promoting motherhood as the right choice. Unsolicited comments act as powerful mechanisms that serve to shame those who can bear children into becoming mothers or facing regret yet simultaneously condemn women who regret motherhood. Women who choose to remain childfree privately challenge unwanted comments by overturning pronatalist discourses, whereas those who regret their choice to become mothers struggle to express their feelings for fear of being judged and branded as failures.
“我们都有遗憾;这并不意味着我们是失败的”:拒绝或后悔做母亲
一个女人选择不生孩子的做法经常遭到不赞成的评论。这篇文章的重点是在一个实现了高度性别平等的国家,促进和保持母亲身份作为妇女首选的产前主义和社会话语。批判性话语分析应用于对冰岛女性、跨性别和非二元人群的30次定性采访,这些人要么选择无子女,要么后悔做母亲。研究结果表明,尽管新自由主义倡导妇女的选择自由权,但出生前意识形态仍在破坏生育自决,将母亲身份视为正确的选择。未经请求的评论是一种强大的机制,有助于羞辱那些能够生育孩子成为母亲或面临遗憾的人,同时谴责那些后悔做母亲的女性。那些选择私下里不生孩子的女性通过推翻出生前的言论来挑战不受欢迎的言论,而那些后悔选择成为母亲的女性则很难表达自己的感受,因为害怕被评判和打上失败的烙印。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Family Issues
Journal of Family Issues FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted to contemporary social issues and social problems related to marriage and family life and to theoretical and professional issues of current interest to those who work with and study families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信