The need of diagrams based on Toulmin schema application: an aeronautical case study

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Thomas Polacsek , Sanjiv Sharma , Claude Cuiller , Vincent Tuloup
{"title":"The need of diagrams based on Toulmin schema application: an aeronautical case study","authors":"Thomas Polacsek ,&nbsp;Sanjiv Sharma ,&nbsp;Claude Cuiller ,&nbsp;Vincent Tuloup","doi":"10.1007/s40070-018-0086-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, justification diagrams are introduced for structuring evidence to support conclusions that are reached from results of simulation studies. An industrial application is used to illustrate the use of the justification diagrams. Adapted from the Toulmin schema, the aim of justification diagram is to define a comprehensive, auditable and shareable notation to explain the results, the input data, the assumptions made and the techniques applied, to construct a cogent conclusion. Further, the dustification diagrams provide a visual representation of the argument that aims to corroborate the specified claims, or conclusions. A large part of this work is based on the application of the justification diagrams in the context of the European project, TOICA. The justification diagrams were used to structure all justifications that would be needed to convince an authority that a simulation process, and the associated results, upheld a particular conclusion. These diagrams are built concurrently in a product development process that accompanies the various stages of Verification and Validation (V&amp;V) and where, for each design stage of V&amp;V, argumentation is constructed by aggregating evidence and documents produced at this design stage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44104,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40070-018-0086-3","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943821000911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this article, justification diagrams are introduced for structuring evidence to support conclusions that are reached from results of simulation studies. An industrial application is used to illustrate the use of the justification diagrams. Adapted from the Toulmin schema, the aim of justification diagram is to define a comprehensive, auditable and shareable notation to explain the results, the input data, the assumptions made and the techniques applied, to construct a cogent conclusion. Further, the dustification diagrams provide a visual representation of the argument that aims to corroborate the specified claims, or conclusions. A large part of this work is based on the application of the justification diagrams in the context of the European project, TOICA. The justification diagrams were used to structure all justifications that would be needed to convince an authority that a simulation process, and the associated results, upheld a particular conclusion. These diagrams are built concurrently in a product development process that accompanies the various stages of Verification and Validation (V&V) and where, for each design stage of V&V, argumentation is constructed by aggregating evidence and documents produced at this design stage.

基于图尔敏模式应用的图的需求:以航空为例
在这篇文章中,论证图被用来构造证据来支持从模拟研究结果中得出的结论。一个工业应用程序被用来说明论证图的使用。论证图的目的是定义一个全面的、可审计的和可共享的符号来解释结果、输入数据、所做的假设和应用的技术,以构建一个令人信服的结论。此外,验证图提供了旨在证实指定的主张或结论的论证的可视化表示。这项工作的很大一部分是基于在欧洲项目TOICA背景下的论证图的应用。论证图被用来构造所有的论证,这些论证将需要说服一个权威机构,一个模拟过程和相关的结果支持一个特定的结论。这些图表是在伴随验证和确认(V&V)的各个阶段的产品开发过程中同时构建的,其中,对于V&V的每个设计阶段,论证是通过聚集在该设计阶段产生的证据和文件来构建的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信