Effect of Bias in Contrast Agent Concentration Measurement on Estimated Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Brain Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies

Q3 Health Professions
A. Dehkordi
{"title":"Effect of Bias in Contrast Agent Concentration Measurement on Estimated Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Brain Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies","authors":"A. Dehkordi","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2019.41400.1598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is widely applied in tumor diagnosis and treatment evaluation. Precision analysis of the estimated PK parameters is essential when they are used as a measure for therapy evaluation or treatment planning. In this study, the accuracy of PK parameters in brain DCE-MRI studies was quantified in relation to two major sources of error(including pre-contrast longitudinal-relaxation time, T1,0 and flip angle, α). \nMaterial and Methods: 3470 dynamic contrast-enhanced-curves were simulated using a wide variation of the PK parameters. The bias of contrast concentration due to the systematic biases in α and T1,0 was calculated and added to both contrast concentration and AIF profiles. Thereafter, the PK parameters were estimated for each simulated curve in the presence of different percentages of relative biases in α and T1,0. The mean percentage error (MPE) of PK parameters was then calculated for all simulated curves. \nResults: The results indicated that plasma volume(vp) was the most sensitive parameter to bias of contrast concentration, which may overestimate up to 700% in 10% coincidence relative bias in α and T1,0. The lowest MPE was related to the backward transfer constant (kep), which was ~2%-15% in 10% coincidence relative bias in each α and T1, 0. \nConclusion: Utilization of a nested model selection technique, along with an accurate estimator, such as maximum-likelihood estimation, created a unique approach for investigating the effect of the bias in the concentration measurement to the estimated PK parameters without the addition of any extra biases to the parameters during the estimation.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"17 1","pages":"142-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2019.41400.1598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is widely applied in tumor diagnosis and treatment evaluation. Precision analysis of the estimated PK parameters is essential when they are used as a measure for therapy evaluation or treatment planning. In this study, the accuracy of PK parameters in brain DCE-MRI studies was quantified in relation to two major sources of error(including pre-contrast longitudinal-relaxation time, T1,0 and flip angle, α). Material and Methods: 3470 dynamic contrast-enhanced-curves were simulated using a wide variation of the PK parameters. The bias of contrast concentration due to the systematic biases in α and T1,0 was calculated and added to both contrast concentration and AIF profiles. Thereafter, the PK parameters were estimated for each simulated curve in the presence of different percentages of relative biases in α and T1,0. The mean percentage error (MPE) of PK parameters was then calculated for all simulated curves. Results: The results indicated that plasma volume(vp) was the most sensitive parameter to bias of contrast concentration, which may overestimate up to 700% in 10% coincidence relative bias in α and T1,0. The lowest MPE was related to the backward transfer constant (kep), which was ~2%-15% in 10% coincidence relative bias in each α and T1, 0. Conclusion: Utilization of a nested model selection technique, along with an accurate estimator, such as maximum-likelihood estimation, created a unique approach for investigating the effect of the bias in the concentration measurement to the estimated PK parameters without the addition of any extra biases to the parameters during the estimation.
脑动态增强磁共振成像研究中造影剂浓度测量偏差对估计药代动力学参数的影响
引言:动态增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)的药代动力学(PK)模型在肿瘤诊断和治疗评估中得到了广泛应用。当估计的PK参数用作治疗评估或治疗计划的衡量标准时,对其进行精确分析是至关重要的。在本研究中,脑DCE-MRI研究中PK参数的准确性与两个主要误差源(包括对比前纵向弛豫时间T1,0和翻转角α)有关。材料和方法:使用PK参数的大范围变化模拟3470条动态对比度增强曲线。计算由于α和T1,0中的系统偏差引起的对比度浓度偏差,并将其添加到对比度浓度和AIF曲线中。此后,在α和T1,0中存在不同百分比的相对偏差的情况下,对每个模拟曲线的PK参数进行估计。然后计算所有模拟曲线的PK参数的平均百分比误差(MPE)。结果:血浆容量(vp)是对造影剂浓度偏差最敏感的参数,在α和T1,0的10%符合相对偏差的情况下,可能高估高达700%。最低MPE与后向转移常数(kep)有关,在每个α和T1,0的10%重合相对偏差下,后向转移系数为~2%-15%。结论:嵌套模型选择技术的使用,加上准确的估计器,如最大似然估计,为研究浓度测量中的偏差对估计的PK参数的影响创造了一种独特的方法,而不需要在估计过程中对参数添加任何额外的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信