Aerobic Training Does not Decrease the Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Older Women: Cross-Sectional Study

IF 1 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
Luis Fernando Ferreira, Arielle Rosa de Oliveira, Maria Laura Schiefelbein, Eduardo Garcia, Luis Henrique Telles da Rosa
{"title":"Aerobic Training Does not Decrease the Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Older Women: Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Luis Fernando Ferreira,&nbsp;Arielle Rosa de Oliveira,&nbsp;Maria Laura Schiefelbein,&nbsp;Eduardo Garcia,&nbsp;Luis Henrique Telles da Rosa","doi":"10.1007/s12126-022-09485-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sarcopenia is one of the several syndromes that affect older adults individuals, being a growing area in the number of scientific productions. To compare the presence of sarcopenia among sedentary and active older adults, practitioners of different models of physical training. 115 individuals, aged 60 years or older, were evaluated for the presence of sarcopenia, according to the recommendations of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. The subjects were divided into 3 groups: a group of 47 sedentary older adults (CON), a group with 30 older adults practicing physical training with emphasis on resistance (RES), and a group of 38 older adults practicing physical training with aerobic emphasis (AER). Individuals still responded to the Wide Geriatric Anamnesis. The prevalence of sarcopenia was lower in RES (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Of the sarcopenia indicators, the skeletal muscle mass was the only one that did not present significant difference. However, strength and performance showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the resistance group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.006, respectively). The total prevalence of sarcopenia was 37.4%, being 46.8% in CON, 6.6% in RES and 37.3% in AER. Resistance training is effective on the counterattack and control of sarcopenia among the subjects assessed, with no difference in the presence of sarcopenia among training practitioners with emphasis aerobic, or sedentary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51665,"journal":{"name":"Ageing International","volume":"48 2","pages":"563 - 574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-022-09485-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Sarcopenia is one of the several syndromes that affect older adults individuals, being a growing area in the number of scientific productions. To compare the presence of sarcopenia among sedentary and active older adults, practitioners of different models of physical training. 115 individuals, aged 60 years or older, were evaluated for the presence of sarcopenia, according to the recommendations of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. The subjects were divided into 3 groups: a group of 47 sedentary older adults (CON), a group with 30 older adults practicing physical training with emphasis on resistance (RES), and a group of 38 older adults practicing physical training with aerobic emphasis (AER). Individuals still responded to the Wide Geriatric Anamnesis. The prevalence of sarcopenia was lower in RES (p < 0.001). Of the sarcopenia indicators, the skeletal muscle mass was the only one that did not present significant difference. However, strength and performance showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the resistance group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). The total prevalence of sarcopenia was 37.4%, being 46.8% in CON, 6.6% in RES and 37.3% in AER. Resistance training is effective on the counterattack and control of sarcopenia among the subjects assessed, with no difference in the presence of sarcopenia among training practitioners with emphasis aerobic, or sedentary.

Abstract Image

有氧训练不能降低老年妇女肌肉减少症的患病率:横断面研究
Sarcopenia是影响老年人的几种综合征之一,在科学研究中越来越多。比较久坐和活动的老年人、不同体育训练模式的从业者中少肌症的存在。根据欧洲老年人少肌症工作组的建议,对115名60岁或以上的人进行了少肌症的评估。受试者被分为3组:一组47名久坐不动的老年人(CON),一组30名老年人进行以阻力为重点的体育训练(RES),以及一组38名老年人练习以有氧为重点的体能训练(AER)。个体仍然对广泛的老年痴呆症有反应。RES患者少肌症的患病率较低(p <; 0.001)。在少肌症指标中,骨骼肌质量是唯一没有显著差异的指标。然而,力量和表现显示出有利于抵抗组的统计学显著差异(p <; 0.001和p = 0.006)。少肌症的总患病率为37.4%,CON为46.8%,RES为6.6%,AER为37.3%。在接受评估的受试者中,阻力训练在对抗和控制肌肉减少症方面是有效的,在强调有氧或久坐的训练从业者中,肌肉减少症的存在没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ageing International
Ageing International GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: As a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that has existed for over three decades, Ageing International serves all professionals who deal with complex ageing issues. The journal is dedicated to improving the life of ageing populations worldwide through providing an intellectual forum for communicating common concerns, exchanging analyses and discoveries in scientific research, crystallizing significant issues, and offering recommendations in ageing-related service delivery and policy making. Besides encouraging the submission of high-quality research and review papers, Ageing International seeks to bring together researchers, policy analysts, and service program administrators who are committed to reducing the ''implementation gap'' between good science and effective service, between evidence-based protocol and culturally suitable programs, and between unique innovative solutions and generalizable policies. For significant issues that are common across countries, Ageing International will organize special forums for scholars and investigators from different disciplines to present their regional perspectives as well as to provide more comprehensive analysis. The editors strongly believe that such discourse has the potential to foster a wide range of coordinated efforts that will lead to improvements in the quality of life of older persons worldwide. Abstracted and Indexed in: ABI/INFORM, Academic OneFile, Academic Search, CSA/Proquest, Current Abstracts, EBSCO, Ergonomics Abstracts, Expanded Academic, Gale, Google Scholar, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, PsychINFO, PsyARTICLES, SCOPUS, Social Science Abstracts, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信