Current Healthcare System for Community Residents with Dementia: A Questionnaire Survey for Dispensing Pharmacies, Home Care Support Offices, and Visiting Care Support Offices

Kyoko Takahashi, Hiroshi Aoki, Yuko Sato, Yumiko Chiba, K. Meguro
{"title":"Current Healthcare System for Community Residents with Dementia: A Questionnaire Survey for Dispensing Pharmacies, Home Care Support Offices, and Visiting Care Support Offices","authors":"Kyoko Takahashi, Hiroshi Aoki, Yuko Sato, Yumiko Chiba, K. Meguro","doi":"10.4172/2161-0711.1000565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Since the number of dementia specialists is limited, dispensing pharmacies provide early detection of dementia patients in the community and drug management instructions, and care managers, who contribute to the collaboration between medical treatment and nursing care, play an important role. This investigation was performed with the aim of clarifying the awareness of dementia medication and actual psychosocial intervention to prepare materials for discussions on a system to provide effective care. \nMethods: The subjects were 80 dispensing pharmacies, 114 home care support offices, and 117 visiting care support offices in Osaki City and Kurihara City in Miyagi Prefecture. The questionnaires were distributed on November 8, 2012, and responses were received until November 27, 2012. \nResults: For antidementia drugs, the answers from the dispensing pharmacies and home care support offices were generally favorable, but many visiting care support offices answered that the drugs were for “general dementia, not for Alzheimer disease (AD). For psychosocial intervention, all of “physical activities,” “activities using reality orientation and reminiscence approach,” and “work and recreation” were performed during past 1 month, but “physical activities” were most reported as regular activity. Regarding reasons for the intervention, the most often reported response was “Reported that the activity would be good for physical and brain conditions”, followed by “users seem to be having fun.” \nConclusion: Knowledge about antidementia drugs was generally favorable, but further clarification will be required for visiting care support offices. For this, smooth communication will be necessary between physicians and care providers. Among the interventions performed in visiting care support offices, “exercise” was most common. This might be confused with the evidence of exercise intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Therefore, feedback to magazines etc. used in the visiting care support offices will be essential.","PeriodicalId":73681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community medicine & health education","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2161-0711.1000565","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community medicine & health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0711.1000565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Since the number of dementia specialists is limited, dispensing pharmacies provide early detection of dementia patients in the community and drug management instructions, and care managers, who contribute to the collaboration between medical treatment and nursing care, play an important role. This investigation was performed with the aim of clarifying the awareness of dementia medication and actual psychosocial intervention to prepare materials for discussions on a system to provide effective care. Methods: The subjects were 80 dispensing pharmacies, 114 home care support offices, and 117 visiting care support offices in Osaki City and Kurihara City in Miyagi Prefecture. The questionnaires were distributed on November 8, 2012, and responses were received until November 27, 2012. Results: For antidementia drugs, the answers from the dispensing pharmacies and home care support offices were generally favorable, but many visiting care support offices answered that the drugs were for “general dementia, not for Alzheimer disease (AD). For psychosocial intervention, all of “physical activities,” “activities using reality orientation and reminiscence approach,” and “work and recreation” were performed during past 1 month, but “physical activities” were most reported as regular activity. Regarding reasons for the intervention, the most often reported response was “Reported that the activity would be good for physical and brain conditions”, followed by “users seem to be having fun.” Conclusion: Knowledge about antidementia drugs was generally favorable, but further clarification will be required for visiting care support offices. For this, smooth communication will be necessary between physicians and care providers. Among the interventions performed in visiting care support offices, “exercise” was most common. This might be confused with the evidence of exercise intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Therefore, feedback to magazines etc. used in the visiting care support offices will be essential.
当前社区痴呆居民的医疗保健系统:对配药药房、家庭护理支持办公室和来访护理支持办公室的问卷调查
背景:由于痴呆症专家的数量有限,配药药店为社区中的痴呆症患者提供早期检测和药物管理指导,护理管理人员在医疗和护理之间的合作中发挥着重要作用。进行这项调查的目的是澄清对痴呆症药物和实际心理社会干预的认识,为讨论提供有效护理的系统准备材料。方法:受试者为宫城县大崎市和栗原市的80家配药药店、114家家庭护理支持办公室和117家探访护理支持办公室。调查问卷于2012年11月8日发放,截止2012年12月27日收到回复。结果:对于抗粘药物,药房和家庭护理支持办公室的回答总体上是有利的,但许多访问护理支持办公室的人回答说,这些药物是针对“一般性痴呆症,而不是阿尔茨海默病(AD)”的。对于心理社会干预,所有的“身体活动”、“使用现实导向和回忆方法的活动”和“工作和娱乐”都是在过去1个月内进行的,但据报道,“体育活动”大多是常规活动。关于干预的原因,最常被报道的反应是“据报道,这种活动对身体和大脑状况都有好处”,其次是“使用者似乎玩得很开心”。结论:对抗牙本质药物的了解总体上是有利的,但访问护理支持办公室需要进一步澄清。为此,医生和护理人员之间必须进行顺畅的沟通。在访问护理支持办公室的干预措施中,“锻炼”最为常见。这可能与轻度认知障碍(MCI)的运动干预证据相混淆。因此,对来访护理支持办公室使用的杂志等的反馈将是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信