ChatGPT’s Capabilities in Spotting and Analyzing Writing Errors Experienced by EFL Learners

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
J. Algaraady, Mohammad Mahyoob
{"title":"ChatGPT’s Capabilities in Spotting and Analyzing Writing Errors Experienced by EFL Learners","authors":"J. Algaraady, Mohammad Mahyoob","doi":"10.24093/awej/call9.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent Large Language Models (LLMs) use advanced algorithms to identify areas where sentence structure and word choice can be improved and to detect grammar, syntax, and spelling mistakes in sentences. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in detecting English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ writing errors compared to human instructors. This study examines the ChatGPT as a recent and advanced LLM in analyzing and processing EFL learners’ writing issues. This paper provides valuable insights into the potential benefits and challenges of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into EFL writing education. Our results revealed that ChatGPT successfully identified most surface-level errors but could not detect writing errors related to deep structure and pragmatics. Conversely, human teachers could spot most of these issues. These findings suggest that while ChatGPT can be a valuable tool in identifying surface-level errors, it cannot replace human instructors’ expertise and nuanced understanding in detecting errors related to the more complex aspects of writing. The writing error types (data) are statistically analyzed. The descriptive analysis displays valuable insights into the reliability of the data and its potential implications, where the F-score, which measures the statistical model accuracy, is found to be 1.5. In the meantime, the p-value score, which shows the probability of obtaining results as extreme as the detected data, is calculated to be 0.23. The results suggest that the collected data is statistically significant, and further analysis may yield valuable insights.","PeriodicalId":45153,"journal":{"name":"Arab World English Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab World English Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent Large Language Models (LLMs) use advanced algorithms to identify areas where sentence structure and word choice can be improved and to detect grammar, syntax, and spelling mistakes in sentences. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in detecting English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ writing errors compared to human instructors. This study examines the ChatGPT as a recent and advanced LLM in analyzing and processing EFL learners’ writing issues. This paper provides valuable insights into the potential benefits and challenges of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into EFL writing education. Our results revealed that ChatGPT successfully identified most surface-level errors but could not detect writing errors related to deep structure and pragmatics. Conversely, human teachers could spot most of these issues. These findings suggest that while ChatGPT can be a valuable tool in identifying surface-level errors, it cannot replace human instructors’ expertise and nuanced understanding in detecting errors related to the more complex aspects of writing. The writing error types (data) are statistically analyzed. The descriptive analysis displays valuable insights into the reliability of the data and its potential implications, where the F-score, which measures the statistical model accuracy, is found to be 1.5. In the meantime, the p-value score, which shows the probability of obtaining results as extreme as the detected data, is calculated to be 0.23. The results suggest that the collected data is statistically significant, and further analysis may yield valuable insights.
ChatGPT在发现和分析英语学习者写作错误方面的能力
最近的大型语言模型(llm)使用先进的算法来识别句子结构和单词选择可以改进的地方,并检测句子中的语法、句法和拼写错误。本研究旨在探讨聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)在检测英语作为外语(EFL)学习者写作错误方面的有效性,并与人类教师进行比较。本研究考察了ChatGPT作为一种最新的高级法学硕士在分析和处理英语学习者的写作问题方面的作用。本文对将人工智能(AI)融入英语写作教育的潜在好处和挑战提供了有价值的见解。我们的研究结果表明,ChatGPT成功地识别了大多数表面错误,但无法检测与深层结构和语用相关的写作错误。相反,人类教师可以发现这些问题中的大部分。这些发现表明,虽然ChatGPT在识别表面错误方面是一个有价值的工具,但它不能取代人类教师在检测与写作中更复杂方面相关的错误方面的专业知识和细致入微的理解。对写入错误类型(数据)进行统计分析。描述性分析显示了对数据可靠性及其潜在含义的有价值的见解,其中衡量统计模型准确性的f分数被发现为1.5。同时,p值得分计算为0.23,表示得到与检测到的数据一样极端的结果的概率。结果表明,收集到的数据具有统计学意义,进一步的分析可能会产生有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arab World English Journal
Arab World English Journal LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
30.00%
发文量
187
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信