Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (March 2021-September 2021)

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Pauline Melin, Susanne Sivonen
{"title":"Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (March 2021-September 2021)","authors":"Pauline Melin, Susanne Sivonen","doi":"10.1177/13882627211050083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In O.D. and Others v INPS (C-350/20), the Court dealt with the refusal of the Italian authorities to grant childbirth and maternity allowances to third-country nationals falling within the scope of the Single Permit Directive. In CG (C-709/20), the Court considered the refusal of the UK authorities to grant social assistance to an economically inactive EU citizen resident under the UK scheme adopted in the context of Brexit. In AB v Olympiako (C-511/19), the Court found that the Greek legislation, adopted in the context of the economic crisis, placing public sector workers in a labour reserve system is not discriminatory on grounds of age. In WABE and MH Müller Handel (C-804/18 and C-341/19), the Court clarified what circumstances could justify differential treatment indirectly based on religion or belief. The Court confirmed the direct effect of the principle of equal pay for male and female workers enshrined in Article 157 TFEU for cases of work of equal value in Tesco Stores (C-624/19). In Team Power Europe (C-784/19), the Court specified under which criteria a temporary-work agency could be considered as pursuing ‘substantial activities’ in a Member State. In A (C-535/19), the Court held that a Member State cannot exclude an economically inactive EU citizen from its public sickness insurance system but does not have to grant access free of charge. In FORMAT (C-879/19), the Court confirmed that Article 14(2) of Regulation 1408/71 does not apply to a person who, under a single employment contract concluded with a single employer, works in several Member States for more than 12 months in each of those Member States. Finally, in PF (C-27/20), the Court dealt a national legislation which uses the penultimate year preceding the payment period as the reference year for the calculation of family allowances to be allocated.","PeriodicalId":44670,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Security","volume":"23 1","pages":"379 - 391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627211050083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In O.D. and Others v INPS (C-350/20), the Court dealt with the refusal of the Italian authorities to grant childbirth and maternity allowances to third-country nationals falling within the scope of the Single Permit Directive. In CG (C-709/20), the Court considered the refusal of the UK authorities to grant social assistance to an economically inactive EU citizen resident under the UK scheme adopted in the context of Brexit. In AB v Olympiako (C-511/19), the Court found that the Greek legislation, adopted in the context of the economic crisis, placing public sector workers in a labour reserve system is not discriminatory on grounds of age. In WABE and MH Müller Handel (C-804/18 and C-341/19), the Court clarified what circumstances could justify differential treatment indirectly based on religion or belief. The Court confirmed the direct effect of the principle of equal pay for male and female workers enshrined in Article 157 TFEU for cases of work of equal value in Tesco Stores (C-624/19). In Team Power Europe (C-784/19), the Court specified under which criteria a temporary-work agency could be considered as pursuing ‘substantial activities’ in a Member State. In A (C-535/19), the Court held that a Member State cannot exclude an economically inactive EU citizen from its public sickness insurance system but does not have to grant access free of charge. In FORMAT (C-879/19), the Court confirmed that Article 14(2) of Regulation 1408/71 does not apply to a person who, under a single employment contract concluded with a single employer, works in several Member States for more than 12 months in each of those Member States. Finally, in PF (C-27/20), the Court dealt a national legislation which uses the penultimate year preceding the payment period as the reference year for the calculation of family allowances to be allocated.
欧盟法院近期案件概述(2021年3月至2021年9月)
在O.D.和其他人诉INPS案(C-350/20)中,法院审理了意大利当局拒绝向属于《单一许可证指令》范围内的第三国国民发放生育和生育津贴的案件。在CG (C-709/20)中,法院考虑了英国当局拒绝根据英国脱欧背景下采用的英国计划向居住在经济上不活跃的欧盟公民提供社会援助。在AB诉奥林匹亚科案(C-511/19)中,法院裁定,在经济危机背景下通过的将公共部门工作人员置于劳动储备制度中的希腊立法,不存在以年龄为由的歧视。在WABE和MH mller Handel案(C-804/18和C-341/19)中,法院澄清了在何种情况下可以间接证明基于宗教或信仰的差别待遇是正当的。法院确认了TFEU第157条规定的男女工人同工同酬原则对Tesco商店同工同酬案件的直接影响(C-624/19)。在欧洲电力小组(C-784/19)中,法院具体规定,根据哪些标准,临时工作机构可被视为在会员国从事“实质性活动”。在A (C-535/19)一案中,法院认为,成员国不能将非从事经济活动的欧盟公民排除在其公共疾病保险制度之外,但不必给予免费准入。在FORMAT (C-879/19)中,法院确认,第1408/71号条例第14(2)条不适用于根据与单一雇主签订的单一雇佣合同在多个成员国工作超过12个月的人。最后,在PF (C-27/20)中,法院处理了一项国家立法,其中使用支付期之前的倒数第二年作为计算分配的家庭津贴的参照年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Social Security
European Journal of Social Security PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信