Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Comprehensive Constipation Questionnaire: A Cross- Sectional Study

Q4 Medicine
Tuba Mahmoudzadeh, F. Ghaderi, M. Asghari jafarabadi, B. Sepehri, H. Adigozali
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Comprehensive Constipation Questionnaire: A Cross- Sectional Study","authors":"Tuba Mahmoudzadeh, F. Ghaderi, M. Asghari jafarabadi, B. Sepehri, H. Adigozali","doi":"10.18502/jmr.v17i2.12416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Chronic constipation is one of the most common complaints of patients in developed countries, which affects 2 to 28% of the world’s population and alters patients’ quality of life extensively. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the comprehensive constipation questionnaire. \nMaterials and Methods: The comprehensive constipation questionnaire was translated into Persian, and its back-translation was confirmed after evaluating the content validity ratio index (CVR) based on Lawshe table (CVR≥0.62). The content validity of the questionnaire was assessed by the content validity index, followed by examining its reliability by Cronbach alpha and test-re-test reliability using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A total of 100 patients with chronic constipation completed the questionnaire. \nResults: Content validity was confirmed in the range of 0.84 to 1.00, and the Cronbach alpha values in the range of 0.90-1.00 were acceptable. In this questionnaire, was ICC in the range of 0.76-0.99 which indicates a level of good to excellent reliability of the questionnaire. Also, the results of the factor analysis were confirmed at a moderate level Kaiser Meyer Olkin test (KMO>0.6) and Bartlett test (P<0.05) by extracting a 1-factor solution. \nConclusion: The Persian version of the comprehensive constipation questionnaire had acceptable validity and reliability and seems to be an effective tool to evaluate patients with constipation.","PeriodicalId":34281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmr.v17i2.12416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic constipation is one of the most common complaints of patients in developed countries, which affects 2 to 28% of the world’s population and alters patients’ quality of life extensively. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the comprehensive constipation questionnaire. Materials and Methods: The comprehensive constipation questionnaire was translated into Persian, and its back-translation was confirmed after evaluating the content validity ratio index (CVR) based on Lawshe table (CVR≥0.62). The content validity of the questionnaire was assessed by the content validity index, followed by examining its reliability by Cronbach alpha and test-re-test reliability using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A total of 100 patients with chronic constipation completed the questionnaire. Results: Content validity was confirmed in the range of 0.84 to 1.00, and the Cronbach alpha values in the range of 0.90-1.00 were acceptable. In this questionnaire, was ICC in the range of 0.76-0.99 which indicates a level of good to excellent reliability of the questionnaire. Also, the results of the factor analysis were confirmed at a moderate level Kaiser Meyer Olkin test (KMO>0.6) and Bartlett test (P<0.05) by extracting a 1-factor solution. Conclusion: The Persian version of the comprehensive constipation questionnaire had acceptable validity and reliability and seems to be an effective tool to evaluate patients with constipation.
波斯语版便秘综合问卷的效度和信度:一项横断面研究
简介:慢性便秘是发达国家患者最常见的主诉之一,影响着全球2 - 28%的人口,并广泛地改变着患者的生活质量。本研究旨在确定波斯语版便秘综合问卷的效度和信度。材料与方法:将便秘综合问卷翻译成波斯语,根据Lawshe表评价内容效度比指数(CVR) (CVR≥0.62)后进行反译。采用内容效度指数评价问卷的内容效度,采用Cronbach alpha法检验问卷的信度,采用类内相关系数(ICC)检验问卷的信度。共有100名慢性便秘患者完成问卷调查。结果:内容效度范围为0.84 ~ 1.00,Cronbach alpha值范围为0.90 ~ 1.00,可接受。在此问卷中,ICC在0.76-0.99的范围内,这表明问卷的信度为良好到优秀的水平。提取单因子溶液,对因子分析结果进行中等水平的Kaiser Meyer Olkin检验(KMO>0.6)和Bartlett检验(P<0.05)验证。结论:波斯语版便秘综合问卷具有可接受的效度和信度,是评估便秘患者的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Rehabilitation
Journal of Modern Rehabilitation Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信