Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: CZT SPECT Study.

Konstantin V Zavadovsky, Darya A Vorobyeva, Olga V Mochula, Andrew V Mochula, Alina N Maltseva, Andrew E Bayev, Marina O Gulya, Alessia Gimelli, Vyacheslav V Ryabov
{"title":"Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Obstructive and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: CZT SPECT Study.","authors":"Konstantin V Zavadovsky, Darya A Vorobyeva, Olga V Mochula, Andrew V Mochula, Alina N Maltseva, Andrew E Bayev, Marina O Gulya, Alessia Gimelli, Vyacheslav V Ryabov","doi":"10.3389/fnume.2022.935539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess single-photon emission computed tomography cadmium-zinc-telluride (SPECT CZT)-derived myocardial blood flow (MBF) flow reserve (MFR) and flow difference (FD) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to compare this data with serum cardiac troponin and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 31 patients with AMI underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA), serial high-sensitivity serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measurement, and CZT SPECT with visual and quantitative (MBF, MFR, and FD) perfusion parameters, and contrast-enhanced CMR. All patients with AMI were divided into two groups: (1) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), <i>n</i> = 10; (2) with obstructive coronary artery disease (MICAD), <i>n</i> = 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The values of SSS and SRS were significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.01) higher whereas global stress MBF, MFR significantly lower in patients with MICAD as compared to MINOCA - 5.0 (3.0; 5.0) <i>vs</i>. 9.0 (5.0; 13.0); 2.0 (1.0; 3.0) <i>vs</i>. 6.0 (3.0; 11.0); 2.02 (1.71; 2.37) <i>vs</i>. 0.86 (0.72; 1.02) ml/min/g; and 2.61 (2.23; 3.14) <i>vs</i>. 1.67 (1.1; 1.9), respectively. Stress MBF correlated with cTnI at 24 h and day 4: ρ = -0.39; <i>p</i> = 0.03 and ρ = -0.47; <i>p</i> = 0.007, respectively. FD correlated with cTnI at 24 h and day 4: ρ = -0.39; <i>p</i> = 0.03 and ρ = -0.46; <i>p</i> = 0.009. CMR analysis showed that infarct size, MVO and myocardial edema in patients with MICAD were significantly (< 0.05) higher as compared to MINOCA: 19.4 (10.4; 29.7) <i>vs</i>. 1.8 (0.0; 6.9); 0.1 (0.0; 0.7) <i>vs</i>. 0.0 (0.0; 0.0) and 19.5 (12.0;30.0) <i>vs</i>. 3.0 (0.0; 12.0), respectively. According to vessel-based analysis of CMR data, acute myocardial injury (defined as late gadolinium enhancement and myocardial edema) was observed more frequently in patients with MICAD compared to MINOCA: 34(37%) <i>vs</i>. 5(5%) <i>p</i> = 0.005, respectively. The values of regional stress MBF, MFR and FD were significantly decreased in LV territories characterized by myocardial injury compared to those without: 0.98 (0.73; 1.79) <i>vs</i>. 1.33 (0.94; 2.08) <i>p</i> < 0.01, 1.64 (1.0; 2.36) <i>vs</i>. 2.0 (1.53; 2.89) <i>p</i> < 0.01 and 0.33 (0.05; 0.57) <i>vs</i>. 0.56 (0.36; 1.32) <i>p</i>> 0.01, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with AMI, SPECT CZT-derived flow measures were associated with the high-sensitivity troponin I as well as the extent of edema, microvascular obstruction, and infarct size detected by CMR. On the regional level, quantitative SPECT CZT measures were significantly lower in vessel territories characterized by myocardial injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":73095,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"935539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in nuclear medicine (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2022.935539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess single-photon emission computed tomography cadmium-zinc-telluride (SPECT CZT)-derived myocardial blood flow (MBF) flow reserve (MFR) and flow difference (FD) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to compare this data with serum cardiac troponin and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings.

Methods: A total of 31 patients with AMI underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA), serial high-sensitivity serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measurement, and CZT SPECT with visual and quantitative (MBF, MFR, and FD) perfusion parameters, and contrast-enhanced CMR. All patients with AMI were divided into two groups: (1) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), n = 10; (2) with obstructive coronary artery disease (MICAD), n = 21.

Results: The values of SSS and SRS were significantly (p < 0.01) higher whereas global stress MBF, MFR significantly lower in patients with MICAD as compared to MINOCA - 5.0 (3.0; 5.0) vs. 9.0 (5.0; 13.0); 2.0 (1.0; 3.0) vs. 6.0 (3.0; 11.0); 2.02 (1.71; 2.37) vs. 0.86 (0.72; 1.02) ml/min/g; and 2.61 (2.23; 3.14) vs. 1.67 (1.1; 1.9), respectively. Stress MBF correlated with cTnI at 24 h and day 4: ρ = -0.39; p = 0.03 and ρ = -0.47; p = 0.007, respectively. FD correlated with cTnI at 24 h and day 4: ρ = -0.39; p = 0.03 and ρ = -0.46; p = 0.009. CMR analysis showed that infarct size, MVO and myocardial edema in patients with MICAD were significantly (< 0.05) higher as compared to MINOCA: 19.4 (10.4; 29.7) vs. 1.8 (0.0; 6.9); 0.1 (0.0; 0.7) vs. 0.0 (0.0; 0.0) and 19.5 (12.0;30.0) vs. 3.0 (0.0; 12.0), respectively. According to vessel-based analysis of CMR data, acute myocardial injury (defined as late gadolinium enhancement and myocardial edema) was observed more frequently in patients with MICAD compared to MINOCA: 34(37%) vs. 5(5%) p = 0.005, respectively. The values of regional stress MBF, MFR and FD were significantly decreased in LV territories characterized by myocardial injury compared to those without: 0.98 (0.73; 1.79) vs. 1.33 (0.94; 2.08) p < 0.01, 1.64 (1.0; 2.36) vs. 2.0 (1.53; 2.89) p < 0.01 and 0.33 (0.05; 0.57) vs. 0.56 (0.36; 1.32) p> 0.01, respectively.

Conclusion: In patients with AMI, SPECT CZT-derived flow measures were associated with the high-sensitivity troponin I as well as the extent of edema, microvascular obstruction, and infarct size detected by CMR. On the regional level, quantitative SPECT CZT measures were significantly lower in vessel territories characterized by myocardial injury.

急性心肌梗死及阻塞性和非阻塞性冠状动脉患者的心肌血流和血流储备:CZT SPECT研究
评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者单光子发射计算机断层扫描镉锌碲化(SPECT CZT)衍生的心肌血流量(MBF)、血流储备(MFR)和血流差(FD),并将这些数据与血清心肌肌钙蛋白和心脏磁共振(CMR)结果进行比较。方法对31例AMI患者行有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)、连续高敏血清心肌肌钙蛋白I (cTnI)测定、CZT SPECT视觉、定量(MBF、MFR、FD)灌注参数及CMR增强检查。所有AMI患者分为两组:(1)非阻塞性冠状动脉(MINOCA), n = 10;(2)伴有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(MICAD), n = 21。结果与MINOCA - 5.0相比,MICAD患者的SSS和SRS值显著(p < 0.01)升高,而整体应激MBF、MFR值显著降低(p < 0.01)。5.0) vs. 9.0 (5.0;13.0);2.0 (1.0;3.0) vs. 6.0 (3.0;11.0);2.02 (1.71;2.37) vs. 0.86 (0.72;1.02毫升/分钟/ g;2.61 (2.23;3.14) vs. 1.67 (1.1;分别为1.9)。应激MBF与24 h和第4天cTnI相关:ρ =−0.39;P = 0.03, ρ = - 0.47;P = 0.007。FD与24 h和第4天的cTnI相关:ρ =−0.39;P = 0.03, ρ = - 0.46;P = 0.009。CMR分析显示,与MINOCA相比,MICAD患者的梗死面积、MVO和心肌水肿显著(< 0.05)升高:19.4 (10.4;29.7) vs. 1.8 (0.0;6.9);0.1 (0.0;0.7) vs. 0.0 (0.0;0.0)和19.5 (12.0;30.0)vs. 3.0 (0.0;分别为12.0)。根据基于血管的CMR数据分析,与MINOCA相比,MICAD患者观察到的急性心肌损伤(定义为晚期钆增强和心肌水肿)更频繁:34(37%)比5(5%)p = 0.005。以心肌损伤为特征的左室区域的区域应激MBF、MFR和FD值与未损伤组相比显著降低:0.98 (0.73;1.79) vs. 1.33 (0.94;2.08) p < 0.01, 1.64 (1.0;2.36) vs. 2.0 (1.53;2.89) p < 0.01和0.33 (0.05);0.57) vs. 0.56 (0.36;1.32) p < 0.01。结论在AMI患者中,SPECT czt衍生的血流测量与高灵敏度肌钙蛋白I以及CMR检测到的水肿程度、微血管阻塞程度和梗死面积相关。在区域水平上,定量SPECT CZT测量在以心肌损伤为特征的血管区域显着降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信