The Comparison of Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment, Response Inhibition and Sustained Attention in Children with ADHD and SCT: Distinct Contribution of ADHD and SCT to Attention Problems Based on Cold and Hot Executive Circuits

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Elnaz Mohammadi, Mohammad Shadbafi
{"title":"The Comparison of Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment, Response Inhibition and Sustained Attention in Children with ADHD and SCT: Distinct Contribution of ADHD and SCT to Attention Problems Based on Cold and Hot Executive Circuits","authors":"Elnaz Mohammadi, Mohammad Shadbafi","doi":"10.32598/IJPCP.27.2.3294.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Recent studies have identified a disorder called Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) that has similarities with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in attention problems and often mistakenly labeled as ADHD. Attention problems also cause malfunctions in executive functions, often involving the hot circuit and the cold circuit. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity to reward and punishment, response inhibition and sustained attention in children with ADHD and SCT. Methods: The design of the present study was in the frame of Casual Comparative. Participants comprised 100 boys (50 ADHD and 50 SCT) from elem entary schools in Tabriz in 1398-1399 academic years, which were selected through a screening method using the Child Behavior Rating Scale (SNAP-IV) and the SCT scale. Then, balloon analogue risk task (BART) was used to measure the sensitivity to reward and punishment and the continuous performance test was used to measure response inhibition and sustained attention. For data analysis Manova and SPSS 20 were used. Results: The results showed that children with ADHD had higher scores in sensitivity to reward and children with SCT had higher scores in sensitivity to punishment. Moreover, children with ADHD have deficits in response inhibition and children with SCT have deficits in sustained attention (P<0.0001). Conclusion: Based on the research Background and the findings of this study, it seems that children with SCT have deficits in hot executive circuit and children with ADHD have trouble in cold executive circuit.","PeriodicalId":43609,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/IJPCP.27.2.3294.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Recent studies have identified a disorder called Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) that has similarities with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in attention problems and often mistakenly labeled as ADHD. Attention problems also cause malfunctions in executive functions, often involving the hot circuit and the cold circuit. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity to reward and punishment, response inhibition and sustained attention in children with ADHD and SCT. Methods: The design of the present study was in the frame of Casual Comparative. Participants comprised 100 boys (50 ADHD and 50 SCT) from elem entary schools in Tabriz in 1398-1399 academic years, which were selected through a screening method using the Child Behavior Rating Scale (SNAP-IV) and the SCT scale. Then, balloon analogue risk task (BART) was used to measure the sensitivity to reward and punishment and the continuous performance test was used to measure response inhibition and sustained attention. For data analysis Manova and SPSS 20 were used. Results: The results showed that children with ADHD had higher scores in sensitivity to reward and children with SCT had higher scores in sensitivity to punishment. Moreover, children with ADHD have deficits in response inhibition and children with SCT have deficits in sustained attention (P<0.0001). Conclusion: Based on the research Background and the findings of this study, it seems that children with SCT have deficits in hot executive circuit and children with ADHD have trouble in cold executive circuit.
ADHD和SCT儿童对奖赏惩罚、反应抑制和持续注意的敏感性比较——基于冷热执行回路的ADHD与SCT对注意问题的不同贡献
目的:最近的研究发现了一种名为Sluggish Cognitive Tempo(SCT)的障碍,它在注意力问题上与注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)相似,经常被错误地标记为ADHD。注意力问题也会导致执行功能出现故障,通常涉及热回路和冷回路。本研究的目的是比较ADHD和SCT儿童对奖惩、反应抑制和持续注意的敏感性。方法:本研究采用随机比较法进行设计。参与者包括来自大不里士小学的100名男孩(50名ADHD和50名SCT),他们在1398-1399学年,通过使用儿童行为评定量表(SNAP-IV)和SCT量表的筛查方法进行选择。然后,使用气球模拟风险任务(BART)来测量对奖惩的敏感性,并使用连续性能测试来测量反应抑制和持续注意力。数据分析采用Manova和SPSS 20。结果:ADHD儿童对奖励的敏感性得分较高,SCT儿童对惩罚的敏感性得分较低。此外,ADHD儿童在反应抑制方面存在缺陷,SCT儿童在持续注意力方面存在缺陷(P<0.0001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信