Objective evaluation of pain using experimental heat stimulation

Pain Research Pub Date : 2018-03-30 DOI:10.11154/PAIN.33.40
A. Nakae, T. Soshi, Yumi Tsugita, Chie Kishimoto, Kosuke Kato
{"title":"Objective evaluation of pain using experimental heat stimulation","authors":"A. Nakae, T. Soshi, Yumi Tsugita, Chie Kishimoto, Kosuke Kato","doi":"10.11154/PAIN.33.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & goal of the study. International Association for the Study of Pain defines pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience which leads to the concept that pain is subjective. Everyone must agree that doctors have to treat patients’ pain if they say that they feel severe pain. However, doctors sometimes encounter problems due to lack of objective evaluation methods of pain. For example, even after the doctor has administered full strength of the medicine for the specific patient for the pain he/she is experiencing, the patient at times still remain unsatisfied. This is because patients are not always able to tell that the medicine has already taken effect. To evaluate patients’ pain correctly, objective evaluation methods should be developed. The goal of the study is to develop a way to evaluate the sharp, momentary pain objectively using electroencephalogram (EEG). Methods. After signing the written informed consent, 20 healthy volunteers attended the study. Five different thermal stimuli (selected from 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50°C stimulus based on individual heat pain tolerance data) were applied randomly using PATHWAY (Medoc Co Ltd., Israel). Participants’ subjective evaluation of pain was done using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Moreover, participants were randomly subjected to 20 pairs of the above mentioned stimuli. The relative rating scale of subjective pain for each thermal stimulus was used as subjective evaluation. Rating were based on the subjective declaration of (\"–3 : The former is very painful\" \"0 : Neither can you say\" \"+3 : the latter is very painful\"), the pairing comparison method of Chefe Method used for scale. Results. In the thermal stimulation, half of the participants showed over 0.6 of R2 value which means correlation coefficient between relative pain scale and amplitude extracted from EEG data. Discrimination rates between maximum stimulation and middle stimulation was 80%, middle stimulation and minimum stimulation also 80% based on subjective evaluation and fluctuation of amplitude data. Discussion. A close relationship between the stimulation intensity and EEG data is clarified. Objective discrimination of pain can be developed using EEG, and in particul ar, it must be useful for patients who cannot describe the amount of pain they are experiencing properly.","PeriodicalId":41148,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11154/PAIN.33.40","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11154/PAIN.33.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background & goal of the study. International Association for the Study of Pain defines pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience which leads to the concept that pain is subjective. Everyone must agree that doctors have to treat patients’ pain if they say that they feel severe pain. However, doctors sometimes encounter problems due to lack of objective evaluation methods of pain. For example, even after the doctor has administered full strength of the medicine for the specific patient for the pain he/she is experiencing, the patient at times still remain unsatisfied. This is because patients are not always able to tell that the medicine has already taken effect. To evaluate patients’ pain correctly, objective evaluation methods should be developed. The goal of the study is to develop a way to evaluate the sharp, momentary pain objectively using electroencephalogram (EEG). Methods. After signing the written informed consent, 20 healthy volunteers attended the study. Five different thermal stimuli (selected from 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50°C stimulus based on individual heat pain tolerance data) were applied randomly using PATHWAY (Medoc Co Ltd., Israel). Participants’ subjective evaluation of pain was done using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Moreover, participants were randomly subjected to 20 pairs of the above mentioned stimuli. The relative rating scale of subjective pain for each thermal stimulus was used as subjective evaluation. Rating were based on the subjective declaration of ("–3 : The former is very painful" "0 : Neither can you say" "+3 : the latter is very painful"), the pairing comparison method of Chefe Method used for scale. Results. In the thermal stimulation, half of the participants showed over 0.6 of R2 value which means correlation coefficient between relative pain scale and amplitude extracted from EEG data. Discrimination rates between maximum stimulation and middle stimulation was 80%, middle stimulation and minimum stimulation also 80% based on subjective evaluation and fluctuation of amplitude data. Discussion. A close relationship between the stimulation intensity and EEG data is clarified. Objective discrimination of pain can be developed using EEG, and in particul ar, it must be useful for patients who cannot describe the amount of pain they are experiencing properly.
实验热刺激对疼痛的客观评价
研究背景与目的。国际疼痛研究协会将疼痛定义为一种不愉快的感觉和情感体验,这导致了疼痛是主观的概念。每个人都必须同意,如果医生说他们感到剧烈疼痛,他们必须治疗病人的疼痛。然而,由于缺乏客观的疼痛评估方法,医生有时会遇到问题。例如,即使在医生给特定的病人服用了他/她正在经历的疼痛的全部药物后,病人有时仍然不满意。这是因为患者并不总是能够知道药物已经生效。要正确评价患者的疼痛,需要建立客观的评价方法。本研究的目的是建立一种利用脑电图(EEG)客观评价瞬间性痛觉的方法。方法。在签署书面知情同意书后,20名健康志愿者参加了这项研究。使用PATHWAY (Medoc Co Ltd, Israel)随机应用5种不同的热刺激(根据个体热痛耐受性数据从40、42、44、46、48和50°C的刺激中选择)。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛进行主观评价。此外,参与者还随机接受了20对上述刺激。采用主观疼痛相对评定量表对各热刺激进行主观评价。评分基于主观声明(“-3:前者很痛苦”“0:你也说不出来”“+3:后者很痛苦”),采用厨师法的配对比较法进行评分。结果。在热刺激中,有一半的参与者表现出超过0.6的R2值,即从EEG数据中提取的相对疼痛量表与振幅之间的相关系数。根据主观评价和振幅数据波动,最大刺激和中刺激的区分率为80%,中刺激和最小刺激的区分率为80%。讨论。阐明了刺激强度与脑电图数据之间的密切关系。利用脑电图可以发展对疼痛的客观辨别,特别是,它必须对那些不能正确描述他们所经历的疼痛程度的患者有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research
Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信