Susanne Langer, Marshall McLuhan and media ecology: Feminist principles in humanist projects

Q2 Social Sciences
Jaqueline McLeod Rogers
{"title":"Susanne Langer, Marshall McLuhan and media ecology: Feminist principles in humanist projects","authors":"Jaqueline McLeod Rogers","doi":"10.1386/eme_00081_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In current scholarship, Susanne Langer and her theories of art, perception and connectivity are less well known than McLuhan’s. Comparison brings to the fore that both were concerned with the dulling effects of heavy-handed science and technology unregulated by human hand and\n heart, and both understood the expressive and liberatory possibilities of language as media and metaphor. By reading ‘diffractively’ ‐ finding new connections and honouring patterns over polemics ‐ this article brings Langer back into the scholarly conversation and\n reinvigorates our understanding of McLuhan. Langer did not consider her thought as principled by feminism. Yet according to recent critical biographer Adrienne Dengerink Chaplin, her work was rooted in feminist ontology for espousing principles of relationality and embodiment. My article argues\n that McLuhan, too, eschewed dichotomies and linearities of traditional thought for the principle of relationality. Extending this claim further, my article also submits that media ecology ‐ with its emphasis on interconnectivities, on feeling and thinking, on non-linearity ‐\n has features in common with feminist thinking.","PeriodicalId":36155,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Media Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explorations in Media Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00081_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In current scholarship, Susanne Langer and her theories of art, perception and connectivity are less well known than McLuhan’s. Comparison brings to the fore that both were concerned with the dulling effects of heavy-handed science and technology unregulated by human hand and heart, and both understood the expressive and liberatory possibilities of language as media and metaphor. By reading ‘diffractively’ ‐ finding new connections and honouring patterns over polemics ‐ this article brings Langer back into the scholarly conversation and reinvigorates our understanding of McLuhan. Langer did not consider her thought as principled by feminism. Yet according to recent critical biographer Adrienne Dengerink Chaplin, her work was rooted in feminist ontology for espousing principles of relationality and embodiment. My article argues that McLuhan, too, eschewed dichotomies and linearities of traditional thought for the principle of relationality. Extending this claim further, my article also submits that media ecology ‐ with its emphasis on interconnectivities, on feeling and thinking, on non-linearity ‐ has features in common with feminist thinking.
苏珊娜·兰格、马歇尔·麦克卢汉与媒体生态学:人文主义项目中的女权主义原则
在目前的学术研究中,苏珊娜·兰格和她的艺术、感知和连接理论不如麦克卢汉的知名。比较表明,两人都关注不受人的手和心控制的高压科学技术的沉闷影响,都理解语言作为媒介和隐喻的表达和解放可能性。通过“衍射式”阅读——在辩论中寻找新的联系和尊重模式——这篇文章将兰格带回了学术对话中,并重新激发了我们对麦克卢汉的理解。兰格并不认为她的思想是女权主义的原则。然而,根据最近的批评传记作家Adrienne Dengerink Chaplin的说法,她的作品植根于女权主义本体论,因为她支持关系性和体现性的原则。我的文章认为,麦克卢汉也避开了传统思想的二分法和线性,以追求关系性原则。进一步扩展这一主张,我的文章还认为,媒体生态学——强调相互联系、感觉和思维、非线性——具有与女权主义思维相同的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Explorations in Media Ecology
Explorations in Media Ecology Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信