The clinical significance of circulating microRNA-21 in patients with IgA nephropathy

A. Y. Cho, Ju Hwan Oh, K. Lee, I. Sun
{"title":"The clinical significance of circulating microRNA-21 in patients with IgA nephropathy","authors":"A. Y. Cho, Ju Hwan Oh, K. Lee, I. Sun","doi":"10.7180/kmj.22.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Urinary microRNA-21 (miR-21) has been reported to correlate with the histologic lesions of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). We investigated whether urinary or circulating miR-21 could serve as a biomarker for detecting the renal progression of IgAN. Methods: Forty patients with biopsy-proven IgAN were enrolled in this study. Serum and urinary sediment miRs were extracted, and the expression of miR-21 was quantified by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Renal progression was defined as end-stage renal disease, a sustained doubling of serum creatinine, or a 50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline. Results: Six patients experienced renal progression during the follow-up period. The baseline eGFR was lower in the progression group (49±11 mL/min/1.73 m 2 vs. 90±23 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , p <0.05) than in the non-progression group. The level of circulating miR-21 on kidney biopsy was higher in the progression group than in the non-progression group (40.0±0.6 vs. 38.2±1.1 ΔCt value of miR-21, p <0.01), whereas there was no significant difference in urinary miR-21 (38.1±2.1 vs. 37.8±1.4 ΔCt value of miR-21, p =0.687) between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that circulating miR-21 had good discrimina-tive power for diagnosing renal progression of IgAN, with an area under the curve of 0.975. Conclusions: The level of circulating miR-21 was higher in the progression group than in the non-progression group at the time of kidney biopsy. Therefore, circulating miR-21 could be a surrogate marker of renal progression in patients with IgAN.","PeriodicalId":53015,"journal":{"name":"Kosin Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kosin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7180/kmj.22.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urinary microRNA-21 (miR-21) has been reported to correlate with the histologic lesions of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). We investigated whether urinary or circulating miR-21 could serve as a biomarker for detecting the renal progression of IgAN. Methods: Forty patients with biopsy-proven IgAN were enrolled in this study. Serum and urinary sediment miRs were extracted, and the expression of miR-21 was quantified by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Renal progression was defined as end-stage renal disease, a sustained doubling of serum creatinine, or a 50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline. Results: Six patients experienced renal progression during the follow-up period. The baseline eGFR was lower in the progression group (49±11 mL/min/1.73 m 2 vs. 90±23 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , p <0.05) than in the non-progression group. The level of circulating miR-21 on kidney biopsy was higher in the progression group than in the non-progression group (40.0±0.6 vs. 38.2±1.1 ΔCt value of miR-21, p <0.01), whereas there was no significant difference in urinary miR-21 (38.1±2.1 vs. 37.8±1.4 ΔCt value of miR-21, p =0.687) between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that circulating miR-21 had good discrimina-tive power for diagnosing renal progression of IgAN, with an area under the curve of 0.975. Conclusions: The level of circulating miR-21 was higher in the progression group than in the non-progression group at the time of kidney biopsy. Therefore, circulating miR-21 could be a surrogate marker of renal progression in patients with IgAN.
IgA肾病患者循环微小RNA-21检测的临床意义
背景:据报道,尿微小RNA-21(miR-21)与IgA肾病(IgAN)的组织学病变有关。我们研究了尿液或循环miR-21是否可以作为检测IgAN肾脏进展的生物标志物。方法:本研究纳入40例经活检证实的IgAN患者。提取血清和尿沉渣中的miR,并通过实时定量聚合酶链反应定量miR-21的表达。肾进展被定义为终末期肾病、血清肌酐持续翻倍或估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)比基线下降50%。结果:6名患者在随访期间出现肾脏进展。进展组的基线eGFR低于非进展组(49±11 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs.90±23 mL/min/1.763 m2,p<0.05)。进展组肾脏活检中循环miR-21的水平高于非进展组(40.0±0.6 vs.38.2±1.1 miR-21ΔCt值,p<0.01),而两组之间尿miR-21没有显著差异(38.1±2.1 vs.37.8±1.4 miR-21ΔCt值,p=0.687)。受试者操作特征曲线分析表明,循环miR-21对IgAN的肾脏进展具有良好的鉴别能力,曲线下面积为0.975。结论:肾活检时,进展组的循环miR-21水平高于非进展组。因此,循环miR-21可能是IgAN患者肾脏进展的替代标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信