New statehood (?) in the post-pandemic context: A reflection from the coordinates of the global market form

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Ainhoa Lasa López
{"title":"New statehood (?) in the post-pandemic context: A reflection from the coordinates of the global market form","authors":"Ainhoa Lasa López","doi":"10.18042/cepc/rep.200.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globalisation, as a strategy of rupture of the material relationship between the Constitution and the Social State form, has generated an erosion of the legitimising assumptions of state sovereignty of social constitutionalism in terms of depoliticisation. However, the multiple crises experienced by the globalising strategy, with particular reference to health, seem to have consolidated a revisionist discourse based on the revaluation of state sovereignty. Precisely, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether the health pandemic has led to a new context that makes possible the return of the state as a response to the problems of legitimisation posed by the global market order. To this end, the analysis will focus on the measures adopted by the European Union and its member states during the pandemic and post-pandemic phases. The special focus on the European order is due to the fact that it has given a normative nature to the structural principles of global market constitutionalism, being its most complete legal formulation. In parallel, the bulk of the reflection will be accompanied by the methodological premise of the material constitution for its explanatory force of the reality of the state form in the constitutional paradigm of the global market, diluting the mirages of constitutional politics and post-positivist-formalism.","PeriodicalId":45899,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Estudios Politicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Estudios Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.200.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globalisation, as a strategy of rupture of the material relationship between the Constitution and the Social State form, has generated an erosion of the legitimising assumptions of state sovereignty of social constitutionalism in terms of depoliticisation. However, the multiple crises experienced by the globalising strategy, with particular reference to health, seem to have consolidated a revisionist discourse based on the revaluation of state sovereignty. Precisely, the aim of this paper is to analyse whether the health pandemic has led to a new context that makes possible the return of the state as a response to the problems of legitimisation posed by the global market order. To this end, the analysis will focus on the measures adopted by the European Union and its member states during the pandemic and post-pandemic phases. The special focus on the European order is due to the fact that it has given a normative nature to the structural principles of global market constitutionalism, being its most complete legal formulation. In parallel, the bulk of the reflection will be accompanied by the methodological premise of the material constitution for its explanatory force of the reality of the state form in the constitutional paradigm of the global market, diluting the mirages of constitutional politics and post-positivist-formalism.
后疫情背景下的新国家(?):来自全球市场形态坐标的反思
全球化作为一种打破宪法与社会国家形式之间物质关系的策略,在去政治化方面侵蚀了社会宪政的国家主权合法化假设。然而,全球化战略所经历的多重危机,特别是在卫生方面,似乎巩固了一种以重新评估国家主权为基础的修正主义言论。准确地说,本文的目的是分析卫生大流行是否导致了一种新的背景,这种背景使得国家作为对全球市场秩序带来的合法化问题的回应而回归成为可能。为此,分析将侧重于欧洲联盟及其成员国在大流行和大流行后阶段采取的措施。对欧洲秩序的特别关注是由于它赋予了全球市场宪政的结构性原则一种规范的性质,作为其最完整的法律表述。与此同时,大部分反思将伴随着物质宪法的方法论前提,因为它在全球市场的宪法范式中解释了国家形式的现实,淡化了宪政政治和后实证主义形式主义的幻想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista De Estudios Politicos
Revista De Estudios Politicos POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信