Editorial: Decolonizing Rather than Decentring ‘Europe’

J. Orbie, Anissa Bougrea, Antonio Salvador M. Alcazar III, Szilvia Nagy, Á. Oleart, Jonalyn C. Paz, Rahel W. Sebhatu, Tiffany G. Williams, I. Wodzka
{"title":"Editorial: Decolonizing Rather than Decentring ‘Europe’","authors":"J. Orbie, Anissa Bougrea, Antonio Salvador M. Alcazar III, Szilvia Nagy, Á. Oleart, Jonalyn C. Paz, Rahel W. Sebhatu, Tiffany G. Williams, I. Wodzka","doi":"10.54648/eerr2023001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Josep Borrell’s infamous 13 October 2022 speech, where he described the European Union (EU) in terms of a ‘garden’ versus the ‘jungle’ outside, has received an unprecedented amount of scrutiny. Yet the metaphor used by the HighRepresentative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and European Commission Vice-President in charge of ‘a stronger Europe in the world’was not new, nor was its underlying logic a surprise. Various analysts have pointed out the colonial tropes in European policymakers’ discourses over the past decades. In an influential essay that came out in 2000, Sir Robert Cooper, who would later also become an advisor to the Council of the EU, the European External Action Service, and the European Commission, pitched the ‘postmodern’ EU where the rule of law is reigning versus ‘premodern’ states where the ‘law of the jungle’ prevails. This illustrates how mainstream EU political discourse has been, and remains, highly colonial in the way in which relations between the EU and its presumed ‘others’ in world politics are conceived. More notable is the intensity of the debate and condemnation that Borrell’s speech has generated within policy and scholarly circles. This reflects a growing realization that the EU should be more modest about its so-called civilizational achievements and acknowledge the long and dark shadow of its colonial past. Against the background of clear challenges to (western) European dominance in the world system, critical observers are ardently questioning Europe’s alleged moral and sociopolitical superiority. Issues of racism within Europe have been increasingly discussed in the wake of ‘Black Lives Matter’ protests. Recent research has revealed","PeriodicalId":84710,"journal":{"name":"European foreign affairs review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European foreign affairs review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2023001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Josep Borrell’s infamous 13 October 2022 speech, where he described the European Union (EU) in terms of a ‘garden’ versus the ‘jungle’ outside, has received an unprecedented amount of scrutiny. Yet the metaphor used by the HighRepresentative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and European Commission Vice-President in charge of ‘a stronger Europe in the world’was not new, nor was its underlying logic a surprise. Various analysts have pointed out the colonial tropes in European policymakers’ discourses over the past decades. In an influential essay that came out in 2000, Sir Robert Cooper, who would later also become an advisor to the Council of the EU, the European External Action Service, and the European Commission, pitched the ‘postmodern’ EU where the rule of law is reigning versus ‘premodern’ states where the ‘law of the jungle’ prevails. This illustrates how mainstream EU political discourse has been, and remains, highly colonial in the way in which relations between the EU and its presumed ‘others’ in world politics are conceived. More notable is the intensity of the debate and condemnation that Borrell’s speech has generated within policy and scholarly circles. This reflects a growing realization that the EU should be more modest about its so-called civilizational achievements and acknowledge the long and dark shadow of its colonial past. Against the background of clear challenges to (western) European dominance in the world system, critical observers are ardently questioning Europe’s alleged moral and sociopolitical superiority. Issues of racism within Europe have been increasingly discussed in the wake of ‘Black Lives Matter’ protests. Recent research has revealed
社论:非殖民化而非分散“欧洲”
Josep Borrell在2022年10月13日发表的臭名昭著的演讲中,将欧盟(EU)描述为“花园”与“丛林”,这一演讲受到了前所未有的审视。然而,欧盟外交和安全政策高级代表兼欧盟委员会负责“世界上更强大的欧洲”的副主席所使用的比喻并不新鲜,其潜在的逻辑也并不令人惊讶。许多分析人士指出,在过去几十年里,欧洲政策制定者的话语中充斥着殖民主义色彩。在2000年发表的一篇有影响力的文章中,后来成为欧盟理事会、欧洲对外行动署和欧盟委员会顾问的罗伯特·库珀爵士,将法治主导的“后现代”欧盟与“弱肉强食”盛行的“前现代”欧盟进行了对比。这说明了欧盟主流政治话语是如何在欧盟和世界政治中假定的“其他国家”之间的关系中,以一种高度殖民的方式被构想出来的。更值得注意的是,博雷尔的演讲在政策和学术圈内引发了激烈的辩论和谴责。这反映出人们越来越意识到,欧盟应该对其所谓的文明成就更加谦虚,并承认其殖民历史的漫长而黑暗的阴影。在(西方)欧洲在世界体系中的主导地位明显受到挑战的背景下,批评人士正强烈质疑欧洲所谓的道德和社会政治优势。在“黑人的命也是命”抗议活动之后,欧洲内部的种族主义问题得到了越来越多的讨论。最近的研究表明
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信