Social capital and COVID-19: a multidimensional and multilevel approach

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Cary Wu
{"title":"Social capital and COVID-19: a multidimensional and multilevel approach","authors":"Cary Wu","doi":"10.1080/21620555.2020.1814139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Growing evidence suggests that outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic are better handled in places where social capital is high. Less clear, however, are the channels through which social capital makes communities better able to respond to outbreaks. In this article I develop a multidimensional and multilevel approach that compares the potential dissimilar effects of social capital in different forms and at different levels. As social capital in different forms and at different levels can affect social outcomes through distinctive means, such an approach can help detect the processes underlying how social capital works. I illustrate this new approach by analyzing data from a survey I conducted in late April 2020 in China’s Hubei province as well as data from the most recent World Values Survey (WVS, 2016–2020). Results suggest that social capital affects COVID-19 response mainly through facilitating collective actions and promoting public acceptance of and compliance with control measures in the form of trust and norms at the individual level. Social capital can also help mobilize resources in the form of networks at the community level. In an authoritarian context, compliance with control measures relies more on people’s trust in their political institutions, less on trust in each other.","PeriodicalId":51780,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Sociological Review","volume":"53 1","pages":"27 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21620555.2020.1814139","citationCount":"83","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2020.1814139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 83

Abstract

Abstract Growing evidence suggests that outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic are better handled in places where social capital is high. Less clear, however, are the channels through which social capital makes communities better able to respond to outbreaks. In this article I develop a multidimensional and multilevel approach that compares the potential dissimilar effects of social capital in different forms and at different levels. As social capital in different forms and at different levels can affect social outcomes through distinctive means, such an approach can help detect the processes underlying how social capital works. I illustrate this new approach by analyzing data from a survey I conducted in late April 2020 in China’s Hubei province as well as data from the most recent World Values Survey (WVS, 2016–2020). Results suggest that social capital affects COVID-19 response mainly through facilitating collective actions and promoting public acceptance of and compliance with control measures in the form of trust and norms at the individual level. Social capital can also help mobilize resources in the form of networks at the community level. In an authoritarian context, compliance with control measures relies more on people’s trust in their political institutions, less on trust in each other.
社会资本与2019冠状病毒病:一个多层面和多层次的方法
摘要越来越多的证据表明,新冠肺炎等疫情在社会资本较高的地方得到了更好的处理。然而,不太清楚的是,社会资本通过哪些渠道使社区能够更好地应对疫情。在这篇文章中,我提出了一种多维和多层次的方法,比较不同形式和不同层次的社会资本的潜在不同影响。由于不同形式和不同水平的社会资本可以通过不同的方式影响社会结果,这种方法可以帮助检测社会资本如何运作的基本过程。我通过分析2020年4月底在中国湖北省进行的一项调查的数据以及最近的世界价值观调查(WVS,2016-2020)的数据来说明这种新方法。研究结果表明,社会资本主要通过促进集体行动以及在个人层面以信任和规范的形式促进公众接受和遵守控制措施来影响新冠肺炎应对。社会资本还可以帮助在社区一级以网络的形式调动资源。在威权主义背景下,遵守控制措施更多地依赖于人们对其政治机构的信任,而不是彼此的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信