Is it reasonable to use high-strength concrete columns under fire conditions?

IF 0.9 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
O. Bahr
{"title":"Is it reasonable to use high-strength concrete columns under fire conditions?","authors":"O. Bahr","doi":"10.1108/jsfe-02-2021-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to answer two questions. First, are there any differences in the fire performance of columns made of normal and of high-strength concrete? Second, under which circumstances does the fire design govern the cross-sectional dimensions of concrete columns? Is it feasible to replace columns out of normal strength concrete by more slender high-strength concrete columns?Design/methodology/approachThe author conducted numerical studies using the finite element code “Infocad” of the German company “Infograph”. The studies included the effect of different parameters on the fire performance of columns out of normal and high-strength concrete, i.e. the load ratio and eccentricity, boundary conditions and times of fire exposure.FindingsResults from the numerical investigations showed that high-strength concrete columns suffer much more from heating than normal strength concrete columns. This is the outcome of the unfavourable mechanical properties of high-strength concrete at elevated temperatures. Although the relative fire performance of columns out of high-strength concrete is worse than that of columns out of normal strength concrete, initial load reserves are beneficial to achieve even high fire ratings.Originality/valueMany researchers addressed in experimental and numerical studies the fire performance of columns out of normal and high-strength concrete. A special emphasis was often laid on the spalling of fire-exposed high-strength concrete. However, there are no systematic investigations when the fire design governs the cross-sectional dimensions of high-strength concrete columns. Based on a previous comparison of the relative fire performance of columns out of normal and high-strength concrete, this paper, hence, addresses the question whether there is a reasonable lower limit for the use of these columns. This is an important aspect for designers since there is a tendency to replace columns out of normal strength concrete by columns out of high-strength concrete. Higher concrete strengths allow for smaller cross sections of the columns, and designers may, hence, increase the usable space of buildings.","PeriodicalId":45033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsfe-02-2021-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to answer two questions. First, are there any differences in the fire performance of columns made of normal and of high-strength concrete? Second, under which circumstances does the fire design govern the cross-sectional dimensions of concrete columns? Is it feasible to replace columns out of normal strength concrete by more slender high-strength concrete columns?Design/methodology/approachThe author conducted numerical studies using the finite element code “Infocad” of the German company “Infograph”. The studies included the effect of different parameters on the fire performance of columns out of normal and high-strength concrete, i.e. the load ratio and eccentricity, boundary conditions and times of fire exposure.FindingsResults from the numerical investigations showed that high-strength concrete columns suffer much more from heating than normal strength concrete columns. This is the outcome of the unfavourable mechanical properties of high-strength concrete at elevated temperatures. Although the relative fire performance of columns out of high-strength concrete is worse than that of columns out of normal strength concrete, initial load reserves are beneficial to achieve even high fire ratings.Originality/valueMany researchers addressed in experimental and numerical studies the fire performance of columns out of normal and high-strength concrete. A special emphasis was often laid on the spalling of fire-exposed high-strength concrete. However, there are no systematic investigations when the fire design governs the cross-sectional dimensions of high-strength concrete columns. Based on a previous comparison of the relative fire performance of columns out of normal and high-strength concrete, this paper, hence, addresses the question whether there is a reasonable lower limit for the use of these columns. This is an important aspect for designers since there is a tendency to replace columns out of normal strength concrete by columns out of high-strength concrete. Higher concrete strengths allow for smaller cross sections of the columns, and designers may, hence, increase the usable space of buildings.
在火灾条件下使用高强度混凝土柱是否合理?
本文旨在回答两个问题。首先,用普通混凝土和高强混凝土制成的柱的防火性能有什么不同吗?第二,在什么情况下防火设计支配混凝土柱的截面尺寸?用细长的高强度混凝土柱代替普通强度混凝土柱是否可行?设计/方法/方法作者使用德国“Infograph”公司的有限元代码“Infocad”进行数值研究。研究包括不同参数对普通和高强混凝土柱防火性能的影响,即荷载比和偏心、边界条件和火灾暴露次数。数值研究结果表明,高强混凝土柱比普通强度混凝土柱受热影响更大。这是高强混凝土在高温下不利的机械性能的结果。尽管高强混凝土柱的相对防火性能比普通强度混凝土柱差,但初始荷载储备有利于达到更高的防火等级。许多研究人员在实验和数值研究中讨论了普通和高强度混凝土柱的防火性能。特别强调的是火灾暴露的高强度混凝土的剥落。然而,对于高强混凝土柱的截面尺寸在防火设计中的控制问题,目前尚无系统的研究。基于先前对普通混凝土和高强度混凝土柱的相对防火性能的比较,本文因此解决了这些柱的使用是否存在合理下限的问题。这对设计师来说是一个重要的方面,因为有一种趋势是用高强度混凝土柱代替普通强度混凝土柱。更高的混凝土强度允许更小的柱的横截面,设计师可以,因此,增加建筑物的可用空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Fire Engineering
Journal of Structural Fire Engineering CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信