Patterns of Failure Outcomes for Combination of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immunotherapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases.

Neurosurgery open Pub Date : 2023-01-11 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000026
Mohammed Abdulhaleem, Hannah Johnston, Ralph D'Agostino, Claire Lanier, Christina K Cramer, Pierre Triozzi, Hui-Wen Lo, Fei Xing, Wencheng Li, Christopher Whitlow, Jaclyn J White, Stephen B Tatter, Adrian W Laxton, Jing Su, Michael D Chan, Jimmy Ruiz
{"title":"Patterns of Failure Outcomes for Combination of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immunotherapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases.","authors":"Mohammed Abdulhaleem, Hannah Johnston, Ralph D'Agostino, Claire Lanier, Christina K Cramer, Pierre Triozzi, Hui-Wen Lo, Fei Xing, Wencheng Li, Christopher Whitlow, Jaclyn J White, Stephen B Tatter, Adrian W Laxton, Jing Su, Michael D Chan, Jimmy Ruiz","doi":"10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous series have demonstrated central nervous system activity for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and shown improved local control between stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and ICI for lung cancer brain metastases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether the addition of ICI to SRS for melanoma brain metastasis improves outcomes when compared with historical control group treated in the era before ICI availability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single institution retrospective series, outcomes of 24 patients with melanoma receiving concurrent ICI and SRS were compared with 111 historical controls treated before ICI era. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cumulative incidence of local and distant failures was estimated using a competing risk model that accounted for baseline differences using propensity score adjustments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median OS time was improved in patients receiving ICI compared with the historical control group (17.6 vs 6.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.056, <i>P</i> = .0005). Cumulative incidence at 1 year for local failure in the historical control and ICI groups was approximately 12.5% and 6.5%, respectively (HR = 0.25, <i>P</i> = .19), while cumulative incidence of distant brain failure in the historical control and ICI groups was approximately 48% and 28%, respectively (HR = 0.326, <i>P</i> = .015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distant brain failure and OS were improved in patients receiving concurrent ICI with SRS compared with historical controls. Local failure trended in the same direction; however, owing to small sample size, this did not reach statistical significance. While these data remain to be validated, they suggest that patients with brain metastasis may benefit from concurrent use of ICI with SRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":93342,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery open","volume":" ","pages":"e00026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous series have demonstrated central nervous system activity for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and shown improved local control between stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and ICI for lung cancer brain metastases.

Objective: To assess whether the addition of ICI to SRS for melanoma brain metastasis improves outcomes when compared with historical control group treated in the era before ICI availability.

Methods: In this single institution retrospective series, outcomes of 24 patients with melanoma receiving concurrent ICI and SRS were compared with 111 historical controls treated before ICI era. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cumulative incidence of local and distant failures was estimated using a competing risk model that accounted for baseline differences using propensity score adjustments.

Results: The median OS time was improved in patients receiving ICI compared with the historical control group (17.6 vs 6.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.056, P = .0005). Cumulative incidence at 1 year for local failure in the historical control and ICI groups was approximately 12.5% and 6.5%, respectively (HR = 0.25, P = .19), while cumulative incidence of distant brain failure in the historical control and ICI groups was approximately 48% and 28%, respectively (HR = 0.326, P = .015).

Conclusion: Distant brain failure and OS were improved in patients receiving concurrent ICI with SRS compared with historical controls. Local failure trended in the same direction; however, owing to small sample size, this did not reach statistical significance. While these data remain to be validated, they suggest that patients with brain metastasis may benefit from concurrent use of ICI with SRS.

立体定向放射手术和免疫治疗联合治疗黑色素瘤脑转移的失败结果模式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信