Editorial: Model-based methods for human–machine cooperative and shared control systems

Jairo Inga, S. Rothfuss, Y. Saito, C. Sentouh
{"title":"Editorial: Model-based methods for human–machine cooperative and shared control systems","authors":"Jairo Inga, S. Rothfuss, Y. Saito, C. Sentouh","doi":"10.3389/fcteg.2023.1188846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human–machine cooperation and shared control have become major areas of interest in various scientific communities. Humans and machines working together as a team yield a high potential which can be leveraged in numerous application domains. The articles in this Research Topic review state-of-the-art methods and present recent approaches for the modeling and design of human–machine cooperative systems, showcasing the latest research for a variety of applications. In addition, the articles show different ways in which the interaction between humans and machines can take place. The huge variety of interaction scenarios as well as the “type” of interaction lead to a similarly large spectrum of models and methods for designing machines that are capable of completing tasks together with a human. One of the most prominent application domains of cooperative and shared control systems is highly automated driving. This is reflected in two articles reporting on research in this application field. The article titled “A review of shared control in automated vehicles: System evaluation” by Sarabia et al. acknowledges the pivotal role of human–machine cooperative driving in future transportation and provides a survey of recent literature focusing on studies with real drivers. The authors emphasize the importance of turning the attention to the evaluation methodology of shared control approaches. The article reviews the recent literature, focusing both on the study design and on the various metrics used in the studies. The authors provide valuable conclusions. For example, research on shared longitudinal control should catch up with research on shared lateral control. Control authority shifting based on driver state should keep receiving increasing attention. Lastly, the evaluation of the interaction itself and of safety have not been performed as intensively as the evaluation of driving performance. The work of Oudainia et al. aims at minimizing conflicts between drivers and lane keeping systems of intelligent vehicles. In their article titled “Online driver model parameter identification using the Lyapunov approach based shared control,” the authors present a driving assistance system for lane keeping, which is based on a dynamic driver model. To robustly identify the driver model parameters for different drivers and situations, a OPEN ACCESS","PeriodicalId":73076,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in control engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in control engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcteg.2023.1188846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human–machine cooperation and shared control have become major areas of interest in various scientific communities. Humans and machines working together as a team yield a high potential which can be leveraged in numerous application domains. The articles in this Research Topic review state-of-the-art methods and present recent approaches for the modeling and design of human–machine cooperative systems, showcasing the latest research for a variety of applications. In addition, the articles show different ways in which the interaction between humans and machines can take place. The huge variety of interaction scenarios as well as the “type” of interaction lead to a similarly large spectrum of models and methods for designing machines that are capable of completing tasks together with a human. One of the most prominent application domains of cooperative and shared control systems is highly automated driving. This is reflected in two articles reporting on research in this application field. The article titled “A review of shared control in automated vehicles: System evaluation” by Sarabia et al. acknowledges the pivotal role of human–machine cooperative driving in future transportation and provides a survey of recent literature focusing on studies with real drivers. The authors emphasize the importance of turning the attention to the evaluation methodology of shared control approaches. The article reviews the recent literature, focusing both on the study design and on the various metrics used in the studies. The authors provide valuable conclusions. For example, research on shared longitudinal control should catch up with research on shared lateral control. Control authority shifting based on driver state should keep receiving increasing attention. Lastly, the evaluation of the interaction itself and of safety have not been performed as intensively as the evaluation of driving performance. The work of Oudainia et al. aims at minimizing conflicts between drivers and lane keeping systems of intelligent vehicles. In their article titled “Online driver model parameter identification using the Lyapunov approach based shared control,” the authors present a driving assistance system for lane keeping, which is based on a dynamic driver model. To robustly identify the driver model parameters for different drivers and situations, a OPEN ACCESS
社论:基于模型的人机协同和共享控制系统方法
人机合作和共享控制已经成为各个科学界感兴趣的主要领域。人类和机器作为一个团队共同工作产生了巨大的潜力,可以在许多应用领域中加以利用。本研究主题中的文章回顾了最先进的方法,并介绍了人机协同系统建模和设计的最新方法,展示了各种应用的最新研究。此外,这些文章还展示了人和机器之间进行互动的不同方式。各种各样的交互场景以及交互的“类型”导致了类似的大量模型和方法,用于设计能够与人类一起完成任务的机器。协作共享控制系统最突出的应用领域之一是高度自动化驾驶。这反映在两篇报道该应用领域研究的文章中。Sarabia等人发表的题为“自动化车辆共享控制综述:系统评估”的文章承认了人机协同驾驶在未来交通中的关键作用,并对最近关注真实驾驶员研究的文献进行了调查。作者强调了将注意力转向共享控制方法的评估方法的重要性。本文回顾了最近的文献,重点是研究设计和研究中使用的各种指标。作者提供了有价值的结论。例如,对共享纵向控制的研究应该赶上对共享横向控制的研究。基于驾驶员状态的控制权限转换应受到越来越多的关注。最后,对相互作用本身和安全性的评估没有像对驾驶性能的评估那样深入。Oudania等人的工作旨在最大限度地减少智能车辆驾驶员和车道保持系统之间的冲突。在题为“使用基于李雅普诺夫方法的共享控制进行在线驾驶员模型参数识别”的文章中,作者提出了一种基于动态驾驶员模型的车道保持驾驶辅助系统。为了稳健地识别不同驾驶员和情况下的驾驶员模型参数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信