ARE CAPITAL CONTROLS AND CENTRAL BANK INTERVENTION EFFECTIVE?

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Hernán Rincón-Castro, Norberto Rodríguez-Niño, Jorge Hernán Toro-Córdoba
{"title":"ARE CAPITAL CONTROLS AND CENTRAL BANK INTERVENTION EFFECTIVE?","authors":"Hernán Rincón-Castro, Norberto Rodríguez-Niño, Jorge Hernán Toro-Córdoba","doi":"10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.313.76064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intervention in the foreign exchange market and capital controls are two controversial policy options that many countries have adopted in order to influence the exchange rate and moderate capital flows. The objective of this paper is to examine their effectiveness for a representative Emerging Market economy. The main findings indicate that neither central bank intervention nor capital controls used separately were successful for depreciating the exchange rate but have the side effect of augmenting its volatility. Nonetheless, during a period when both policies were used simultaneously, they were effective to impact the exchange rate, without increasing its volatility. ?SON EFECTIVOS LOS CONTROLES DE CAPITAL Y LA INTERVENCION DEL BANCO CENTRAL? RESUMEN La intervencion en el mercado cambiario y los controles de capital son dos instrumentos de politica controversiales que muchos paises han utilizado para influir sobre la tasa de cambio y moderar los flujos de capital. El objetivo de este articulo es evaluar su efectividad para una economia emergente representativa. Los principales hallazgos indican que ni la intervencion cambiaria ni los controles de capital utilizados por separado tuvieron exito en afectar la tasa de cambio, pero si tuvieron un impacto no deseado como fue aumentar su volatilidad. Sin embargo, durante el periodo en el que ambas politicas se usaron simultaneamente, fueron efectivas en impactar la tasa de cambio sin incrementar su volatilidad.","PeriodicalId":44170,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion Economica","volume":"79 1","pages":"31-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion Economica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.313.76064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intervention in the foreign exchange market and capital controls are two controversial policy options that many countries have adopted in order to influence the exchange rate and moderate capital flows. The objective of this paper is to examine their effectiveness for a representative Emerging Market economy. The main findings indicate that neither central bank intervention nor capital controls used separately were successful for depreciating the exchange rate but have the side effect of augmenting its volatility. Nonetheless, during a period when both policies were used simultaneously, they were effective to impact the exchange rate, without increasing its volatility. ?SON EFECTIVOS LOS CONTROLES DE CAPITAL Y LA INTERVENCION DEL BANCO CENTRAL? RESUMEN La intervencion en el mercado cambiario y los controles de capital son dos instrumentos de politica controversiales que muchos paises han utilizado para influir sobre la tasa de cambio y moderar los flujos de capital. El objetivo de este articulo es evaluar su efectividad para una economia emergente representativa. Los principales hallazgos indican que ni la intervencion cambiaria ni los controles de capital utilizados por separado tuvieron exito en afectar la tasa de cambio, pero si tuvieron un impacto no deseado como fue aumentar su volatilidad. Sin embargo, durante el periodo en el que ambas politicas se usaron simultaneamente, fueron efectivas en impactar la tasa de cambio sin incrementar su volatilidad.
资本管制和央行干预有效吗?
干预外汇市场和资本管制是许多国家为影响汇率和适度资本流动而采取的两种有争议的政策选择。本文件的目的是审查其对具有代表性的新兴市场经济的有效性。主要调查结果表明,中央银行的干预和单独使用的资本管制都没有成功地使汇率贬值,但也有增加其波动性的副作用。然而,在这两项政策同时使用的时期,它们在不增加汇率波动的情况下有效地影响了汇率?资本管制和中央银行的干预是否有效?摘要外汇市场干预和资本管制是许多国家用来影响汇率和调节资本流动的两种有争议的政策工具。本文的目的是评估其对具有代表性的新兴经济体的有效性。主要发现表明,无论是汇率干预还是单独使用的资本管制都没有成功地影响汇率,但如果它们产生了意想不到的影响,例如增加其波动性。然而,在这两项政策同时使用的时期,它们在不增加汇率波动性的情况下有效地影响了汇率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: It is a specialized journal, bilingual (Spanish and English), plural and critical, which accepts and publishes scientific research articles in national and international economy. It is considered a public good that belongs to the University and society. Its vocation is to analyze the evolution of the theoretical and practical economics. In its pages the paradigms of economics, history of economic thought, the theories and debates about economic policy and its consequences, the diagnosis of the Mexican economy, the economic development of Latin America and the problems spread the world economy in general. It is a journal that does not discriminate plural none paradigm; theoretical orientation is unorthodox for epistemological reasons, not ideological preferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信