From “Sit Still and Listen” to “Get Up and Move,” the Leap May Be One of Educational Paradigms but No Longer One of Faith

IF 2.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
S. Vazou
{"title":"From “Sit Still and Listen” to “Get Up and Move,” the Leap May Be One of Educational Paradigms but No Longer One of Faith","authors":"S. Vazou","doi":"10.1249/TJX.0000000000000096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION We live in an era inwhich opportunities for physical activity do not arise naturally in the course of daily life. The industrialized way of life and technological advancements contribute to physical inactivity. If we want children to perform the recommended amount of daily physical activity, it is the responsibility of adults to create appropriate conditions for children to have opportunities for movement. Even more effort should be invested in stimulating the desire andmotivation of children to be and remain physically active. Although the school environment can be an ideal setting for comprehensive physical activity intervention programs, the pressure on schools to prioritize academic achievement has led many school administrators to view calls for increased physical activity opportunities as unrealistic in the context of limited time and resources. However, the body of evidence, while still developing, is strong enough to support the conclusion that physical activity does not interfere with or take time away from learning. To the contrary, it is beneficial for academic achievement and school success (1,2). These benefits have been recognized by several governmental agencies and professional organizations over the last decade (i.e., the American College of Sports Medicine, the Institute of Medicine, and SHAPE America). Evidence-based position papers issued by such organizations have helped in raising awareness and promoting engagement among school staff and policymakers toward increasing opportunities for physical activity at schools. For example, it is remarkable that, for the first time, a collaborative effort emerged between a leading educational agency (the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development) and a national health organization (the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), with the joint goal of promoting learning and health through a whole-school, wholecommunity, whole-child model (WSCC model [3]).","PeriodicalId":75243,"journal":{"name":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

INTRODUCTION We live in an era inwhich opportunities for physical activity do not arise naturally in the course of daily life. The industrialized way of life and technological advancements contribute to physical inactivity. If we want children to perform the recommended amount of daily physical activity, it is the responsibility of adults to create appropriate conditions for children to have opportunities for movement. Even more effort should be invested in stimulating the desire andmotivation of children to be and remain physically active. Although the school environment can be an ideal setting for comprehensive physical activity intervention programs, the pressure on schools to prioritize academic achievement has led many school administrators to view calls for increased physical activity opportunities as unrealistic in the context of limited time and resources. However, the body of evidence, while still developing, is strong enough to support the conclusion that physical activity does not interfere with or take time away from learning. To the contrary, it is beneficial for academic achievement and school success (1,2). These benefits have been recognized by several governmental agencies and professional organizations over the last decade (i.e., the American College of Sports Medicine, the Institute of Medicine, and SHAPE America). Evidence-based position papers issued by such organizations have helped in raising awareness and promoting engagement among school staff and policymakers toward increasing opportunities for physical activity at schools. For example, it is remarkable that, for the first time, a collaborative effort emerged between a leading educational agency (the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development) and a national health organization (the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), with the joint goal of promoting learning and health through a whole-school, wholecommunity, whole-child model (WSCC model [3]).
从“静静地坐着听”到“站起来动起来”,这种飞跃可能是一种教育范式,但不再是一种信仰
引言我们生活在一个身体活动的机会不会在日常生活中自然出现的时代。工业化的生活方式和技术进步导致了身体不活动。如果我们希望儿童进行推荐量的日常体育活动,成年人有责任为儿童创造适当的运动条件。应该投入更多的精力来激发孩子们进行和保持体育活动的愿望和动力。尽管学校环境可能是全面体育活动干预计划的理想环境,但学校优先考虑学业成绩的压力导致许多学校管理人员认为,在时间和资源有限的情况下,增加体育活动机会的呼吁是不现实的。然而,大量证据虽然仍在发展中,但足以支持体育活动不会干扰学习或占用学习时间的结论。相反,它有利于学业成绩和学业成功(1,2)。在过去的十年里,这些好处已经得到了几个政府机构和专业组织的认可(即美国运动医学院、医学研究所和SHAPE America)。这些组织发布的基于证据的立场文件有助于提高学校工作人员和政策制定者的认识,促进他们参与,增加学校体育活动的机会。例如,值得注意的是,一个领先的教育机构(监督和课程开发协会)和一个国家卫生组织(疾病控制和预防中心)首次开展了合作,共同目标是通过整个学校、整个社区、整个儿童的模式(WSCC模式[3])促进学习和健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信