Participation of the Public in Central and Local Governance: Principles, Statistics and European Experiences for Ukraine

V. Semianovskyi
{"title":"Participation of the Public in Central and Local Governance: Principles, Statistics and European Experiences for Ukraine","authors":"V. Semianovskyi","doi":"10.31767/su.2(85)2019.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Issues of the effective participation and cooperation of the civil society in power bodies have been a central social problem of the globe in the latest times. Although theoretical issues of participatory governance have been well developed and widely implemented, e. g. in business sector, cooperation of Power and Community pose a serious problem in the world and Ukraine in particular. The effectiveness of cooperation between Power and the civil society is downgraded by the issue the current condition of both parties, the quality of their work and their mutual trust. Also, it needs to be born in mind that this problem is a part of the triangle Power – Society – Business, and that the external environment has significant impact in the conditions of globalization. \nGiven the Ukrainian context, it should be considered that the power system here was inherited from the Soviet Union. It is incompatible with the present-day realities, and its reform has been so far ineffective. The data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine (SSSU) show the vast numbers of officials in local governance and central power bodies, picked up in industry-like administrative departments. The bulky apparatus of public governance being streamlined on the problem solution process in economic industries, social problems, not mentioning the ones of individual humans, can be looked at only before elections.   \nOn the other hand, according to SSSU, Ukraine has a network of rather diverse public organizations, but their total number is small. According to Eurostat, quantitative and qualitative parameters of the civil society in Ukraine lag far behind the European ones. A diversity of goals, weak consolidation of efforts, resources and methods for solving the most important problems are factors complicating the cooperation between Power and Community. \nTheoretical and practical aspects of the problem related with cooperation of Power and the civil society have been elaborated in Europe since long. Advanced principles and various technologies for its solution have been proposed and implemented. The first typology of the public participation in form of “public participation staircase” was admittedly made by researcher Sh. R. Arnstein. She broke the staircase into the three levels: non-participation, symbolic participation, public power. To boost the effectiveness of collaborative action, the European community has elaborated the Code of recommended norms for the participation of the public in taking public decisions. In fact, this technology is the standard of cooperation between Power and Community in Europe.   \nThe need for reform of the system for cooperation of power bodies with the civil society in Ukraine by use the European experience of cooperation is substantiated. The issues of goals, principles, methods and phases of cooperation between the power and the society, their advantages and drawbacks are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":52812,"journal":{"name":"Statistika Ukrayini","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistika Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31767/su.2(85)2019.02.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Issues of the effective participation and cooperation of the civil society in power bodies have been a central social problem of the globe in the latest times. Although theoretical issues of participatory governance have been well developed and widely implemented, e. g. in business sector, cooperation of Power and Community pose a serious problem in the world and Ukraine in particular. The effectiveness of cooperation between Power and the civil society is downgraded by the issue the current condition of both parties, the quality of their work and their mutual trust. Also, it needs to be born in mind that this problem is a part of the triangle Power – Society – Business, and that the external environment has significant impact in the conditions of globalization. Given the Ukrainian context, it should be considered that the power system here was inherited from the Soviet Union. It is incompatible with the present-day realities, and its reform has been so far ineffective. The data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine (SSSU) show the vast numbers of officials in local governance and central power bodies, picked up in industry-like administrative departments. The bulky apparatus of public governance being streamlined on the problem solution process in economic industries, social problems, not mentioning the ones of individual humans, can be looked at only before elections.   On the other hand, according to SSSU, Ukraine has a network of rather diverse public organizations, but their total number is small. According to Eurostat, quantitative and qualitative parameters of the civil society in Ukraine lag far behind the European ones. A diversity of goals, weak consolidation of efforts, resources and methods for solving the most important problems are factors complicating the cooperation between Power and Community. Theoretical and practical aspects of the problem related with cooperation of Power and the civil society have been elaborated in Europe since long. Advanced principles and various technologies for its solution have been proposed and implemented. The first typology of the public participation in form of “public participation staircase” was admittedly made by researcher Sh. R. Arnstein. She broke the staircase into the three levels: non-participation, symbolic participation, public power. To boost the effectiveness of collaborative action, the European community has elaborated the Code of recommended norms for the participation of the public in taking public decisions. In fact, this technology is the standard of cooperation between Power and Community in Europe.   The need for reform of the system for cooperation of power bodies with the civil society in Ukraine by use the European experience of cooperation is substantiated. The issues of goals, principles, methods and phases of cooperation between the power and the society, their advantages and drawbacks are highlighted.
公众参与中央和地方治理:乌克兰的原则、统计和欧洲经验
民间社会在权力机构中的有效参与与合作问题是最近时代全球的一个中心社会问题。虽然参与式治理的理论问题已经得到了很好的发展和广泛的实施,例如在商业部门,权力和社区的合作是一个严重的问题,在世界上,特别是在乌克兰。由于双方目前的状况、工作质量和相互信任等问题,当局与民间社会之间合作的有效性被降低。此外,需要牢记的是,这个问题是权力-社会-企业三角关系的一部分,外部环境在全球化条件下具有重大影响。鉴于乌克兰的情况,应该认为这里的电力系统是从苏联继承下来的。它与当今的现实是不相容的,它的改革到目前为止是无效的。来自乌克兰国家统计局(SSSU)的数据显示,地方政府和中央权力机构的大量官员都是在类似工业的行政部门中挑选出来的。庞大的公共管理机构正在精简经济行业的问题解决过程,社会问题,更不用说个人的问题,只能在选举之前看到。另一方面,根据SSSU的说法,乌克兰有一个相当多样化的公共组织网络,但它们的总数很少。根据欧盟统计局的数据,乌克兰公民社会的数量和质量指标远远落后于欧洲。解决最重要问题的目标多样化、努力、资源和方法缺乏整合是使权力与共同体之间的合作复杂化的因素。与权力和民间社会合作有关的问题的理论和实践方面在欧洲早已得到阐述。提出并实施了解决该问题的先进原理和各种技术。公众参与的第一个类型学以“公众参与阶梯”的形式被公认是由研究员Sh. R. Arnstein提出的。她把楼梯分成三个层次:非参与、象征性参与、公共权力。为了提高合作行动的效力,欧洲共同体制定了公众参与公共决策的建议准则守则。事实上,这项技术是欧洲电力与共同体合作的标准。利用欧洲的合作经验,改革乌克兰权力机构与民间社会合作制度的必要性得到了证实。强调了权力与社会合作的目标、原则、方式、阶段、优势与不足等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信