A multitiered approach for grassland ecosystem services mapping and assessment: The Viva Grass tool

IF 1.8 Q3 ECOLOGY
M. Villoslada, Ivo Vinogradovs, Anda Ruskule, K. Veidemane, O. Nikodemus, R. Kasparinskis, K. Sepp, J. Gulbinas
{"title":"A multitiered approach for grassland ecosystem services mapping and assessment: The Viva Grass tool","authors":"M. Villoslada, Ivo Vinogradovs, Anda Ruskule, K. Veidemane, O. Nikodemus, R. Kasparinskis, K. Sepp, J. Gulbinas","doi":"10.3897/ONEECO.3.E25380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the second half of the 20th Century, the area of semi-natural grasslands in the Baltic States decreased substantially, due to agricultural abandonment in some areas and intensification in more productive soil types. In order to halt the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services provided by grasslands, the LIFE+ programme funded project, LIFE Viva Grass, aims at developing an integrated planning tool that will support ecosystem-based planning and sustainable grassland management. LIFE Viva Grass integrated planning tool is spatially explicit and allows the user to assess the provision and trade-offs of grassland ecosystem services within eight project case study areas in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.\n In order to ensure methodological adaptability, the structure of the LIFE Viva Grass integrated planning tool follows the framework of the tiered approach. In a multi-tier system, each consecutive tier entails an increase in data requirements, methodological complexity or both. The present paper outlines the adaptation of the tiered approach for mapping and assessing ecosystem services provided by grasslands in the Baltic States. The first tier corresponds to a deliberative decision process: The matrix approach is used to assess the potential supply of grassland ecosystem services based on expert estimations. Expert values are subsequently transferred to grassland units and therefore made spatially explicit. The data collected in the first tier was further enhanced through a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) in order to explore ES bundles in tier 2. In the third tier, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis is used to target specific policy questions.","PeriodicalId":36908,"journal":{"name":"One Ecosystem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Ecosystem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ONEECO.3.E25380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Throughout the second half of the 20th Century, the area of semi-natural grasslands in the Baltic States decreased substantially, due to agricultural abandonment in some areas and intensification in more productive soil types. In order to halt the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services provided by grasslands, the LIFE+ programme funded project, LIFE Viva Grass, aims at developing an integrated planning tool that will support ecosystem-based planning and sustainable grassland management. LIFE Viva Grass integrated planning tool is spatially explicit and allows the user to assess the provision and trade-offs of grassland ecosystem services within eight project case study areas in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. In order to ensure methodological adaptability, the structure of the LIFE Viva Grass integrated planning tool follows the framework of the tiered approach. In a multi-tier system, each consecutive tier entails an increase in data requirements, methodological complexity or both. The present paper outlines the adaptation of the tiered approach for mapping and assessing ecosystem services provided by grasslands in the Baltic States. The first tier corresponds to a deliberative decision process: The matrix approach is used to assess the potential supply of grassland ecosystem services based on expert estimations. Expert values are subsequently transferred to grassland units and therefore made spatially explicit. The data collected in the first tier was further enhanced through a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) in order to explore ES bundles in tier 2. In the third tier, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis is used to target specific policy questions.
草地生态系统服务制图与评估的多层次方法:Viva Grass工具
在整个20世纪下半叶,波罗的海国家半天然草地的面积大幅减少,这是由于一些地区的农业放弃和生产力更高的土壤类型的集约化。为了阻止草原所提供的生物多样性和生态系统服务的丧失,LIFE+方案资助的项目LIFE Viva Grass旨在开发一种综合规划工具,以支持基于生态系统的规划和可持续草原管理。LIFE Viva Grass综合规划工具在空间上是明确的,允许用户在爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛的八个项目案例研究区域内评估草地生态系统服务的提供和权衡。为了确保方法的适应性,LIFE Viva Grass综合规划工具的结构遵循分层方法的框架。在多层系统中,每个连续的层都需要增加数据需求或方法复杂性,或者两者兼而有之。本文概述了采用分层方法绘制和评估波罗的海国家草原提供的生态系统服务。第一层对应于一个深思熟虑的决策过程:在专家估计的基础上,使用矩阵法评估草地生态系统服务的潜在供应。专家值随后被转移到草地单位,因此在空间上是明确的。通过主成分分析(PCA)进一步增强了第一层收集的数据,以便探索第2层中的ES包。在第三层,多标准决策分析用于针对特定的政策问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
One Ecosystem
One Ecosystem Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信