{"title":"City Women: Managers and Leading Ladies at the City of London Theatre, 1837–1848","authors":"Stephen Ridgwell","doi":"10.1017/S0266464X23000118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1830s and 1840s, the female management of London theatres, conducted singly or in partnership, was surprisingly common. Charismatic actress-managers such as Madame Vestris and Mrs Keeley have long been familiar to students of British theatre, as too the establishments they managed. Much less well known is the City of London Theatre in Norton Folgate, one of several minor playhouses then active in the East End. Opened in the year that Victoria came to the throne (1837), during its first decade the City was unrivalled as a home for the so-called ‘wo-manager’. Although largely forgotten today, Lucy Honey, Eliza Vincent, Harriett Lacy, and Maria Honner added much to the cultural vibrancy of an important theatre district at a moment of significant social change. Stephen Ridgwell here explores an under-researched world of theatre enterprise, and argues that the marginality subsequently conferred upon these women in no way reflects their contemporary visibility and standing. The article also highlights the importance of Eliza Vincent’s collaborations with George Dibdin Pitt, a dramatist of growing interest to scholars across a range of fields, and proposes that further consideration of this partnership might usefully be undertaken.","PeriodicalId":43990,"journal":{"name":"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY","volume":"39 1","pages":"200 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X23000118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the 1830s and 1840s, the female management of London theatres, conducted singly or in partnership, was surprisingly common. Charismatic actress-managers such as Madame Vestris and Mrs Keeley have long been familiar to students of British theatre, as too the establishments they managed. Much less well known is the City of London Theatre in Norton Folgate, one of several minor playhouses then active in the East End. Opened in the year that Victoria came to the throne (1837), during its first decade the City was unrivalled as a home for the so-called ‘wo-manager’. Although largely forgotten today, Lucy Honey, Eliza Vincent, Harriett Lacy, and Maria Honner added much to the cultural vibrancy of an important theatre district at a moment of significant social change. Stephen Ridgwell here explores an under-researched world of theatre enterprise, and argues that the marginality subsequently conferred upon these women in no way reflects their contemporary visibility and standing. The article also highlights the importance of Eliza Vincent’s collaborations with George Dibdin Pitt, a dramatist of growing interest to scholars across a range of fields, and proposes that further consideration of this partnership might usefully be undertaken.
在19世纪30年代和40年代,女性单独或合伙管理伦敦剧院的现象非常普遍。像Vestris夫人和Keeley夫人这样有魅力的女演员经纪人,对英国戏剧的学生来说是很熟悉的,他们所管理的机构也是如此。诺顿福尔盖特的伦敦城剧院(City of London Theatre)就不那么知名了,它是当时活跃在伦敦东区的几家小剧院之一。在维多利亚即位的那一年(1837年)开业,在它的第一个十年里,作为所谓的“女经理”的家,伦敦城是无与伦比的。露西·霍尼、伊丽莎·文森特、哈里特·莱西和玛丽亚·霍纳在社会发生重大变化的时刻,为一个重要的剧院区增添了许多文化活力,尽管如今这些人基本上被遗忘了。斯蒂芬·里奇威尔在这里探索了一个尚未被充分研究的戏剧企业世界,并认为随后赋予这些女性的边缘地位绝不能反映她们在当代的知名度和地位。这篇文章还强调了伊丽莎·文森特与乔治·迪布丁·皮特(George Dibdin Pitt)合作的重要性,皮特是一位越来越受到各个领域学者兴趣的剧作家,并建议进一步考虑这种合作关系可能会有所帮助。
期刊介绍:
New Theatre Quarterly provides a vital international forum where theatrical scholarship and practice can meet and where prevailing dramatic assumptions can be subjected to vigorous critical questioning. It shows that theatre history has a contemporary relevance, that theatre studies need a methodology and that theatre criticism needs a language. The journal publishes news, analysis and debate within the field of theatre studies.