Investigating social media conversations: Towards implementing an online reputation management framework for NPOs

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Juran van Heerden, R. Rensburg
{"title":"Investigating social media conversations: Towards implementing an online reputation management framework for NPOs","authors":"Juran van Heerden, R. Rensburg","doi":"10.18820/24150525/COMM.V23.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the research reported in this article was to investigate whether a proposed online reputation management framework can be implemented for an NPO to effect stakeholder engagement in social media content and conversations. The research further assessed whether an NPO can afford greater control of the social web by tracking critical comments and negative publicity and by utilising this information to manage its reputation. The latter was achieved by exploring the Facebook page of a South African trade union, Solidarity, to determine the impact of online conversations on the reputation of the NPO, regardless of the content. A case study methodology was used for the research. The research, which departed from an interpretivist tradition, aimed at analysing the online interactions of stakeholders and their impact on the reputation of the organisation. Data was elicited through interviews with administrators and the content of conversations on Facebook. The latter was analysed through content analysis. The outcomes of the research and the ideas presented in this article might assist NPOs with reputation management by implementing the online reputation management framework as a tool to manage and direct their online content and conversations for improved reputation.","PeriodicalId":41956,"journal":{"name":"Communitas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150525/COMM.V23.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The main objective of the research reported in this article was to investigate whether a proposed online reputation management framework can be implemented for an NPO to effect stakeholder engagement in social media content and conversations. The research further assessed whether an NPO can afford greater control of the social web by tracking critical comments and negative publicity and by utilising this information to manage its reputation. The latter was achieved by exploring the Facebook page of a South African trade union, Solidarity, to determine the impact of online conversations on the reputation of the NPO, regardless of the content. A case study methodology was used for the research. The research, which departed from an interpretivist tradition, aimed at analysing the online interactions of stakeholders and their impact on the reputation of the organisation. Data was elicited through interviews with administrators and the content of conversations on Facebook. The latter was analysed through content analysis. The outcomes of the research and the ideas presented in this article might assist NPOs with reputation management by implementing the online reputation management framework as a tool to manage and direct their online content and conversations for improved reputation.
调查社会媒体对话:为非营利组织实施在线声誉管理框架
本文报道的研究的主要目的是调查是否可以为NPO实施拟议的在线声誉管理框架,以影响利益相关者参与社交媒体内容和对话。该研究进一步评估了非营利组织是否能够通过跟踪批评评论和负面宣传,并利用这些信息来管理其声誉,从而更好地控制社交网络。后者是通过探索南非工会团结工会的Facebook页面来实现的,以确定在线对话对NPO声誉的影响,无论内容如何。研究采用了案例研究方法。这项研究背离了解释主义的传统,旨在分析利益相关者的在线互动及其对组织声誉的影响。数据是通过对管理人员的采访和Facebook上的对话内容得出的。后者通过内容分析进行分析。本文中提出的研究结果和想法可能有助于NPO通过实施在线声誉管理框架来进行声誉管理,将其作为管理和指导其在线内容和对话的工具,以提高声誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communitas
Communitas COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信