Rewiring practice: community mental health professionals’ attitudes towards and knowledge of electroconvulsive therapy in the context of advance decision-making

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Rebecca Dunlop, Gaia Cetrano
{"title":"Rewiring practice: community mental health professionals’ attitudes towards and knowledge of electroconvulsive therapy in the context of advance decision-making","authors":"Rebecca Dunlop, Gaia Cetrano","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-07-2021-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn England, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) cannot be administered to service users who make an advance decision to refuse the treatment, unless in life-threatening circumstances. In a sector where person-centred practice is revered, no prior research has investigated whether community mental health practitioners (CMHPs) encourage service users to make advance decisions about ECT. This study aims to explore whether CMHPs have supported advance decision-making about ECT and whether their profession, attitudes towards and knowledge of the treatment affect this.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA quantitative online survey was completed by n = 120 CMHPs (nurses, social workers and occupational therapists). The validated Questionnaire on Attitudes and Knowledge of ECT was used.\n\n\nFindings\nIn total, 93% of participants knew service users who had undergone ECT, yet only 12% had supported a service user to make an advance decision about ECT. Compared to those who had not supported advance decision-making, those who had shown significantly higher knowledge and a more positive attitude. Nurses and those who had worked in the mental health field for over 10 years had significantly higher knowledge of ECT.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nCMHPs are well placed to support advance decision-making about ECT. Increased knowledge about advance decisions and ECT may bolster the uptake of advance decision-making, thus greater training is recommended.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-07-2021-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose In England, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) cannot be administered to service users who make an advance decision to refuse the treatment, unless in life-threatening circumstances. In a sector where person-centred practice is revered, no prior research has investigated whether community mental health practitioners (CMHPs) encourage service users to make advance decisions about ECT. This study aims to explore whether CMHPs have supported advance decision-making about ECT and whether their profession, attitudes towards and knowledge of the treatment affect this. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative online survey was completed by n = 120 CMHPs (nurses, social workers and occupational therapists). The validated Questionnaire on Attitudes and Knowledge of ECT was used. Findings In total, 93% of participants knew service users who had undergone ECT, yet only 12% had supported a service user to make an advance decision about ECT. Compared to those who had not supported advance decision-making, those who had shown significantly higher knowledge and a more positive attitude. Nurses and those who had worked in the mental health field for over 10 years had significantly higher knowledge of ECT. Originality/value CMHPs are well placed to support advance decision-making about ECT. Increased knowledge about advance decisions and ECT may bolster the uptake of advance decision-making, thus greater training is recommended.
重新布线实践:社区精神卫生专业人员对预先决策背景下电休克治疗的态度和知识
目的在英国,除非在危及生命的情况下,否则不能对事先决定拒绝治疗的服务使用者实施电休克疗法(ECT)。在一个以人为本的实践备受推崇的领域,之前没有研究调查过社区精神卫生从业人员(CMHPs)是否鼓励服务使用者提前做出关于电痉挛疗法的决定。本研究旨在探讨CMHPs是否支持电痉挛疗法的提前决策,以及他们的职业、对治疗的态度和知识是否会影响这一点。设计/方法/方法n = 120名CMHPs(护士、社工和职业治疗师)完成了一项定量在线调查。采用经验证的ECT态度与知识问卷。总的来说,93%的参与者认识接受过电痉挛疗法的服务使用者,但只有12%的人支持服务使用者提前做出关于电痉挛疗法的决定。与那些没有支持提前决策的人相比,这些人表现出更高的知识和更积极的态度。护士和从事精神卫生工作10年以上的人对电痉挛疗法的认识明显高于其他人群。独创性/价值ecmhp很好地支持了电痉挛疗法的提前决策。增加关于预先决策和电痉挛疗法的知识可能会促进预先决策的接受,因此建议进行更多的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信