Epistemes of human rights in Kashmir: Paradoxes of universality and particularity

IF 1 2区社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Journal of Human Rights Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI:10.1080/14754835.2022.2030207

Sarbani Sharma

{"title":"Epistemes of human rights in Kashmir: Paradoxes of universality and particularity","authors":"Sarbani Sharma","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2022.2030207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Human rights violations through militarized control have been the cornerstone of Indian statecraft in Indian-administered Kashmir. This article offers a close reading of the April 2017 episode of using a civilian Kashmiri Muslim man as a human shield by the Indian Army in Indian-administered Kashmir. Whereas the existing scholarship on the relationship between militarization, human rights violations, and Hindutva politics have employed political or feminist analytical frameworks, this article focuses on rereading the episode of human shield usage to analyze how “universality” of human rights in India is being redefined. It reflects on how the ruling right-wing government in India appropriates the language of violations and afflictions to embolden its strategies to alter the grammar of human rights in India. Drawing on a discourse analysis of the human shield event, the article deliberates on how anthropology of Hindutva and right-wing extremism research could pay greater attention to the conversation between Hindutva theology of rights and neoliberal ethics when approaching questions of recurrent human rights violations in Kashmir.","PeriodicalId":51734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2022.2030207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Human rights violations through militarized control have been the cornerstone of Indian statecraft in Indian-administered Kashmir. This article offers a close reading of the April 2017 episode of using a civilian Kashmiri Muslim man as a human shield by the Indian Army in Indian-administered Kashmir. Whereas the existing scholarship on the relationship between militarization, human rights violations, and Hindutva politics have employed political or feminist analytical frameworks, this article focuses on rereading the episode of human shield usage to analyze how “universality” of human rights in India is being redefined. It reflects on how the ruling right-wing government in India appropriates the language of violations and afflictions to embolden its strategies to alter the grammar of human rights in India. Drawing on a discourse analysis of the human shield event, the article deliberates on how anthropology of Hindutva and right-wing extremism research could pay greater attention to the conversation between Hindutva theology of rights and neoliberal ethics when approaching questions of recurrent human rights violations in Kashmir.

查看原文本刊更多论文

克什米尔人权事件：普遍性和特殊性的悖论

摘要通过军事控制侵犯人权一直是印度在印控克什米尔的治国方略的基石。这篇文章细读了2017年4月印度军队在印控克什米尔使用一名克什米尔穆斯林平民作为人盾的事件。尽管现有的关于军事化、侵犯人权和印度教政治之间关系的研究采用了政治或女权主义的分析框架，但本文侧重于重读人盾使用事件，以分析印度人权的“普遍性”是如何被重新定义的。它反映了印度执政的右翼政府如何利用侵犯和苦难的语言来鼓励其改变印度人权语法的策略。文章通过对人盾事件的话语分析，思考了印度教人类学和右翼极端主义研究如何在处理克什米尔一再发生的侵犯人权问题时，更加关注印度教权利神学与新自由主义伦理之间的对话。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Human Rights Multiple-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

21.10%

发文量