The Avant-Garde Is Dead, Long Live the Avant-Garde: Glauber Rocha’s Rereading of Brazilian Modernismo and Di Cavalcanti

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Rodrigo López Martínez
{"title":"The Avant-Garde Is Dead, Long Live the Avant-Garde: Glauber Rocha’s Rereading of Brazilian Modernismo and Di Cavalcanti","authors":"Rodrigo López Martínez","doi":"10.1080/13569325.2022.2158310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Glauber Rocha’s Di-Glauber as a filmic rereading and interrogation of Brazilian Modernismo and Emiliano Di Cavalcanti’s position in the Brazilian artistic tradition. Di-Glauber transforms Di Cavalcanti’s funeral into an anthropology of images, exploring established and possible relations between art, death, and society. Its unorthodox cinematic approach deconstructs Modernismo and Di Cavalcanti’s canonisation within Brazil’s “official” and transcendental national identity. First, Di-Glauber presents an affective account of Rocha and Di Cavalcanti’s friendship, diverting the painter’s institutionalisation through an immanent prism. Then, the film deconstructs its own representational status, self-reflexively exposing itself as an audiovisual artefact and hindering its eventual utilisation as part of an essentialist Brazilian identity. Di-Glauber paradoxically draws upon avant-gardist means to question the avant-garde’s canonisation: Rocha’s anthropophagy devours Di Cavalcanti and Modernismo to reclaim the political potential of the Brazilian artistic avant-garde.","PeriodicalId":56341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2022.2158310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines Glauber Rocha’s Di-Glauber as a filmic rereading and interrogation of Brazilian Modernismo and Emiliano Di Cavalcanti’s position in the Brazilian artistic tradition. Di-Glauber transforms Di Cavalcanti’s funeral into an anthropology of images, exploring established and possible relations between art, death, and society. Its unorthodox cinematic approach deconstructs Modernismo and Di Cavalcanti’s canonisation within Brazil’s “official” and transcendental national identity. First, Di-Glauber presents an affective account of Rocha and Di Cavalcanti’s friendship, diverting the painter’s institutionalisation through an immanent prism. Then, the film deconstructs its own representational status, self-reflexively exposing itself as an audiovisual artefact and hindering its eventual utilisation as part of an essentialist Brazilian identity. Di-Glauber paradoxically draws upon avant-gardist means to question the avant-garde’s canonisation: Rocha’s anthropophagy devours Di Cavalcanti and Modernismo to reclaim the political potential of the Brazilian artistic avant-garde.
前卫已经死了,前卫万岁:格劳伯·罗查重读巴西现代主义与迪卡瓦尔康蒂
本文将格劳伯-罗查的《格劳伯》视为对巴西现代主义的电影重读和拷问,以及埃米利亚诺·迪卡瓦尔康蒂在巴西艺术传统中的地位。迪格劳伯将迪卡瓦尔康蒂的葬礼转变为一种图像人类学,探索艺术、死亡和社会之间已建立的和可能的关系。其非正统的电影方法解构了现代主义和迪卡瓦尔康蒂在巴西“官方”和超越的国家身份中的推崇。首先,Di Glauber对Rocha和Di Cavalcanti的友谊进行了情感描述,通过一个内在的棱镜转移了画家的制度化。然后,这部电影解构了它自己的代表性地位,自我反射地将自己暴露为一个视听制品,并阻碍了它作为巴西本质主义身份的一部分的最终利用。Di Glauber矛盾地利用先锋派的手段来质疑先锋派的经典化:罗查的食人狂吞噬了Di Cavalcanti和现代主义,以重新获得巴西艺术先锋派的政治潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信