Integration of Point of Care Ultrasound during Rapid Sequence Intubation in Trauma Resuscitation

J. Sriharsha, S. Adarsh, Madhu Srinivasarangan, S. Omar
{"title":"Integration of Point of Care Ultrasound during Rapid Sequence Intubation in Trauma Resuscitation","authors":"J. Sriharsha, S. Adarsh, Madhu Srinivasarangan, S. Omar","doi":"10.46347/jmsh.v9i1.22.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) is the definitive modality of airway management when resuscitating trauma patients in the Emergency Department (ED). This study was done to evaluate the utility of POCUS in RSI and its efficacy in confirming tube placement as compared to conventional methods. Aims & Objectives: Primary Objectives - Time taken for airway evaluation and identifying potentially fatal conditions using POCUS guided Intubation Algorithm (PA) during RSI. Proper placement of the endotracheal tube and confirmation of the same was also assessed and compared with the conventional technique. Methodology: A prospective, randomized single-centred study was conducted in 100 trauma patients requiring emergent airway management, presenting to the ED. The time taken and efficacy of confirmation of tube placement is recorded and compared in two arms. Results: In our study we found the mean procedure time for ETT placement was less in the PA arm compared to the CE arm (45 vs 91.36 seconds, p<0.0001). Oesophageal intubations were detected in the PA arm in 22 seconds vs 114 seconds in CE arm with a p< 0.0001 and the time taken for effective reintubation was 26.67 vs 55 seconds in the PA and CE arm with a p value < 0.007 respectively. Conclusion: POCUS detected oesophageal intubations and confirmed proper tube position in less time when compared to standard techniques such as five-point auscultation and capnography. The results of this study have proved that POCUS is a useful adjunct to the Emergency physician to improve quality of care in trauma patients. Keywords: Point of care ultrasound, Rapid sequence intubation, Trauma, Emergency department, Emergency physician, Endotracheal tube, End tidal carbon dioxide, Ultrasound, Clinical examination","PeriodicalId":33653,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46347/jmsh.v9i1.22.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) is the definitive modality of airway management when resuscitating trauma patients in the Emergency Department (ED). This study was done to evaluate the utility of POCUS in RSI and its efficacy in confirming tube placement as compared to conventional methods. Aims & Objectives: Primary Objectives - Time taken for airway evaluation and identifying potentially fatal conditions using POCUS guided Intubation Algorithm (PA) during RSI. Proper placement of the endotracheal tube and confirmation of the same was also assessed and compared with the conventional technique. Methodology: A prospective, randomized single-centred study was conducted in 100 trauma patients requiring emergent airway management, presenting to the ED. The time taken and efficacy of confirmation of tube placement is recorded and compared in two arms. Results: In our study we found the mean procedure time for ETT placement was less in the PA arm compared to the CE arm (45 vs 91.36 seconds, p<0.0001). Oesophageal intubations were detected in the PA arm in 22 seconds vs 114 seconds in CE arm with a p< 0.0001 and the time taken for effective reintubation was 26.67 vs 55 seconds in the PA and CE arm with a p value < 0.007 respectively. Conclusion: POCUS detected oesophageal intubations and confirmed proper tube position in less time when compared to standard techniques such as five-point auscultation and capnography. The results of this study have proved that POCUS is a useful adjunct to the Emergency physician to improve quality of care in trauma patients. Keywords: Point of care ultrasound, Rapid sequence intubation, Trauma, Emergency department, Emergency physician, Endotracheal tube, End tidal carbon dioxide, Ultrasound, Clinical examination
创伤复苏快速顺序插管中护理点超声的整合
简介:快速顺序插管(RSI)是在急诊科(ED)对创伤患者进行复苏时气道管理的最终模式。本研究旨在评估POCUS在RSI中的应用,以及与传统方法相比,POCUS在确认导管放置方面的有效性。目的与目标:主要目标-在RSI期间使用POCUS引导插管算法(PA)进行气道评估和识别潜在致命疾病所需的时间。气管插管的正确放置和确认也与常规技术进行了评估和比较。方法:一项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究对100例需要急诊气道管理的创伤患者进行了研究。记录两组患者确认气管放置的时间和效果,并进行比较。结果:在我们的研究中,我们发现与CE组相比,PA组ETT放置的平均手术时间更短(45秒vs 91.36秒,p<0.0001)。PA组插管时间为22秒,CE组为114秒,p< 0.0001; PA组和CE组有效插管时间分别为26.67秒和55秒,p值分别< 0.007。结论:与五点听诊、超声心动图等标准技术相比,POCUS可在更短的时间内发现食管插管并确定合适的管位。本研究结果证明POCUS是急诊医师提高创伤患者护理质量的有效辅助手段。关键词:护理点超声,快速顺序插管,创伤,急诊科,急诊医师,气管内插管,末潮二氧化碳,超声,临床检查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信