Measuring volatility spillovers and asymmetric responses of Agri commodity prices: evidence from spices and rubber futures in India

IF 0.8 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
S. Nair
{"title":"Measuring volatility spillovers and asymmetric responses of Agri commodity prices: evidence from spices and rubber futures in India","authors":"S. Nair","doi":"10.1108/IGDR-10-2020-0147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate price responses and volatility spillovers between commodity spot and futures markets. The study ultimately seeks the evidence-based claims on the efficiency of the long run and short run horizontal price transmissions from futures markets to spot markets.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study used the most recent daily price series of pepper, cardamom and rubber, during the period 2004–2019, use “cointegration-ECM-GARCH framework” and verify the persisting validity of the “expectancy theory” of commodity futures pricing.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results offer overwhelming evidence of futures market dominance in the price discoveries and volatility spillovers in spot markets. However, this paper finds asymmetric responses between cash and futures prices across markets. The hedging efficiency of futures contracts is commodities specific’ where spices futures are more efficient than the rubber futures.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study passes on vital information to the producers and traders of spices and rubber who have a potential interest in the use of futures contracts to make profits from arbitrage between futures and cash markets.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper is unique in terms of understanding asymmetric price linkages in markets for plantation crops.\n","PeriodicalId":42861,"journal":{"name":"Indian Growth and Development Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"242-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Growth and Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IGDR-10-2020-0147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate price responses and volatility spillovers between commodity spot and futures markets. The study ultimately seeks the evidence-based claims on the efficiency of the long run and short run horizontal price transmissions from futures markets to spot markets. Design/methodology/approach This study used the most recent daily price series of pepper, cardamom and rubber, during the period 2004–2019, use “cointegration-ECM-GARCH framework” and verify the persisting validity of the “expectancy theory” of commodity futures pricing. Findings The results offer overwhelming evidence of futures market dominance in the price discoveries and volatility spillovers in spot markets. However, this paper finds asymmetric responses between cash and futures prices across markets. The hedging efficiency of futures contracts is commodities specific’ where spices futures are more efficient than the rubber futures. Practical implications The study passes on vital information to the producers and traders of spices and rubber who have a potential interest in the use of futures contracts to make profits from arbitrage between futures and cash markets. Originality/value The paper is unique in terms of understanding asymmetric price linkages in markets for plantation crops.
衡量农产品价格波动溢出和不对称反应:来自印度香料和橡胶期货的证据
目的探讨商品现货和期货市场之间的价格反应和波动溢出效应。本研究最终寻求基于证据的关于期货市场到现货市场的长期和短期水平价格传导效率的主张。本研究采用2004-2019年期间辣椒、豆蔻和橡胶的最新每日价格序列,采用“协整- ecm - garch框架”,验证了商品期货定价“预期理论”的持续有效性。研究结果为期货市场在价格发现和现货市场波动溢出方面的主导地位提供了压倒性的证据。然而,本文发现现货价格和期货价格之间的不对称反应。期货合约的对冲效率是特定商品的,其中香料期货比橡胶期货更有效。实际意义本研究为香料和橡胶生产商和贸易商提供了重要信息,这些生产商和贸易商对利用期货合约在期货和现货市场之间套利获利有潜在的兴趣。这篇论文在理解种植园作物市场的不对称价格联系方面是独一无二的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信