Planning Cities with Young People and Schools: Forging Justice, Generating Joy

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
F. Aminpour
{"title":"Planning Cities with Young People and Schools: Forging Justice, Generating Joy","authors":"F. Aminpour","doi":"10.1080/08111146.2023.2217562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"bakeries were not only permitted land uses, but virtually unrestricted in terms of their operations. “Arbitrary Lines: How Zoning Broke the American City and How to Fix It” balances technical language with non-technical language rather well and would make a good supplement to any university curriculum in planning. Critical readers will no doubt be tempted to see Gray’s argument as a libertarian Trojan Horse, meaning that if cities are quick to discard zoning, they may inadvertently be supporting the interests of private capital, whose rapid deployment in densification projects would no doubt upset the existing urban fabric. Maybe this is a good thing in addressing the ills that Gray has expounded, but maybe not. Surely the issue of zoning remains a complex one, and this book will undoubtedly catalyse salient conversations of this nature in the policy world, piquing the interests of YIMBYs and NIMBYs alike. I would recommend this book to the interested public, or to planners grappling with many of the issues that Gray recounts: sprawl, segregation, affordability, or overly restrictive land use rules. After reading the book, I too find myself partially convinced: maybe it is high time to reconsider zoning in our cities?","PeriodicalId":47081,"journal":{"name":"Urban Policy and Research","volume":"41 1","pages":"348 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Policy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2023.2217562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

bakeries were not only permitted land uses, but virtually unrestricted in terms of their operations. “Arbitrary Lines: How Zoning Broke the American City and How to Fix It” balances technical language with non-technical language rather well and would make a good supplement to any university curriculum in planning. Critical readers will no doubt be tempted to see Gray’s argument as a libertarian Trojan Horse, meaning that if cities are quick to discard zoning, they may inadvertently be supporting the interests of private capital, whose rapid deployment in densification projects would no doubt upset the existing urban fabric. Maybe this is a good thing in addressing the ills that Gray has expounded, but maybe not. Surely the issue of zoning remains a complex one, and this book will undoubtedly catalyse salient conversations of this nature in the policy world, piquing the interests of YIMBYs and NIMBYs alike. I would recommend this book to the interested public, or to planners grappling with many of the issues that Gray recounts: sprawl, segregation, affordability, or overly restrictive land use rules. After reading the book, I too find myself partially convinced: maybe it is high time to reconsider zoning in our cities?
与年轻人和学校一起规划城市:锻造正义,创造欢乐
面包店不仅获准使用土地,而且在经营方面几乎不受限制。《任意的界线:分区是如何破坏美国城市的,以及如何修复它》很好地平衡了技术语言和非技术语言,将成为任何大学规划课程的很好的补充。挑剔的读者无疑会把格雷的观点看作是自由主义的特洛伊木马,这意味着如果城市很快放弃分区,他们可能会无意中支持私人资本的利益,而私人资本在高密度化项目中的快速部署无疑会扰乱现有的城市结构。也许这是解决格雷所阐述的弊病的一件好事,但也许不是。当然,分区问题仍然是一个复杂的问题,这本书无疑将在政策世界中催化这种性质的突出对话,激起邻避主义者和邻避主义者的兴趣。我将把这本书推荐给感兴趣的公众,或者那些正在努力解决格雷所叙述的许多问题的规划者:扩张、隔离、负担能力或过度限制的土地使用规则。读完这本书后,我也发现自己部分确信:也许是时候重新考虑我们城市的分区了?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信