Special issue on ‘Current issues in ports and maritime transportation’

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
H. Meersman, E. Van de Voorde, T. Vanelslander
{"title":"Special issue on ‘Current issues in ports and maritime transportation’","authors":"H. Meersman, E. Van de Voorde, T. Vanelslander","doi":"10.1080/03088839.2021.1953176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue is the fruit of the World Conference on Transport Research that was held in 2019 in Mumbai. It brings together a series of eight papers that each tackles a current issue in ports and/ or maritime transportation. Six of the papers deal with infrastructure and terminal efficiency, which is a clear illustration of how crucial efficiency is in today’s port world, under increasing pressure by ever-larger shipping companies with ever-growing ships. A second issue is the climate, where transport and shipping, in particular, are the most important sources of the main emissions. A third and final issue is port co-operation, particularly with a view to the hinterland. The papers have in common that each uses a distinct modelling approach to answer their main research question. The first paper, by van Hassel et al., focuses on the impact of increasing ship sizes on the need for bigger infrastructure, here in particular the expansion of the Panama Canal. That Canal, together with the Suez Canal, is one of the two shortcuts on the connections between the world’s continents. Therefore, the impact of its bottleneck role, on the one hand, or its expansion on the other hand, is felt even on the other side of the globe. This paper shows how the expanded Panama Canal not only turns US port competition totally upside down but also impacts on port competition in other continents. In the US, for trades with Europe, US East Coast ports suddenly come into the picture for a large part of the US hinterland. The reasoning, of course, also goes the other way around for trades with Asia. But more strikingly, even though with a shift that is smaller, there is an impact on port competition within Europe. Turning to ports, four papers on this issue deal with a case study on port efficiency. The four papers also apply different methods and make linkages with different factors. The first paper, by Fernández et al., makes an analysis for Spanish ports. The authors apply a two-stage DEA method, and make a link with container specialisation. Spanish ports appear to feature a high heterogeneity in cargo specialisation. On the output side, the main commodity types as they shape shipping markets are used. On the input side, two factors are used: labour and intermediate consumptions. High-complex ports appear to have a higher overall efficiency. Low-complex ports have higher pure technical efficiency than overall technical efficiency. Third, it is observed that technologies between ports have converged over the past decades. The main lesson from the research is that overcapacity is a big issue, especially in smaller ports. The second port efficiency paper, by Diakomihalis et al., makes an application to Greek ports. The authors apply ordinal logistic regression and one-way ANOVA, combined with DEA. On the input side, they use four types of financial ratios, dealing, respectively, with liquidity, activity profitability, and viability. The authors observed that the four ordinal logistic regressions did not show any differences in the evaluation of port efficiency; there was a difference in the fixed assets ratio between the pre-crisis and in-crisis years. In addition, the DEA results suggest that the ports remain inefficient, though the scores for the pre-crisis, in-crisis, and the entire period of investigation vary. One certain implication is that the government should introduce at least some element of private management if the ports are to maintain or increase their efficiency. The third paper on port efficiency, by Görçün, focuses on the Black Sea container ports. Two multi-criteria decision-making models are applied: the first consists of the entropy and OCRA technique, while the second model consists of the Entropy and EATWIOS method. A long list of input factors is considered, next to the outputs. It can be seen that output factors are more MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT 2021, VOL. 48, NO. 5, 607–609 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1953176","PeriodicalId":18288,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Policy & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Policy & Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1953176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue is the fruit of the World Conference on Transport Research that was held in 2019 in Mumbai. It brings together a series of eight papers that each tackles a current issue in ports and/ or maritime transportation. Six of the papers deal with infrastructure and terminal efficiency, which is a clear illustration of how crucial efficiency is in today’s port world, under increasing pressure by ever-larger shipping companies with ever-growing ships. A second issue is the climate, where transport and shipping, in particular, are the most important sources of the main emissions. A third and final issue is port co-operation, particularly with a view to the hinterland. The papers have in common that each uses a distinct modelling approach to answer their main research question. The first paper, by van Hassel et al., focuses on the impact of increasing ship sizes on the need for bigger infrastructure, here in particular the expansion of the Panama Canal. That Canal, together with the Suez Canal, is one of the two shortcuts on the connections between the world’s continents. Therefore, the impact of its bottleneck role, on the one hand, or its expansion on the other hand, is felt even on the other side of the globe. This paper shows how the expanded Panama Canal not only turns US port competition totally upside down but also impacts on port competition in other continents. In the US, for trades with Europe, US East Coast ports suddenly come into the picture for a large part of the US hinterland. The reasoning, of course, also goes the other way around for trades with Asia. But more strikingly, even though with a shift that is smaller, there is an impact on port competition within Europe. Turning to ports, four papers on this issue deal with a case study on port efficiency. The four papers also apply different methods and make linkages with different factors. The first paper, by Fernández et al., makes an analysis for Spanish ports. The authors apply a two-stage DEA method, and make a link with container specialisation. Spanish ports appear to feature a high heterogeneity in cargo specialisation. On the output side, the main commodity types as they shape shipping markets are used. On the input side, two factors are used: labour and intermediate consumptions. High-complex ports appear to have a higher overall efficiency. Low-complex ports have higher pure technical efficiency than overall technical efficiency. Third, it is observed that technologies between ports have converged over the past decades. The main lesson from the research is that overcapacity is a big issue, especially in smaller ports. The second port efficiency paper, by Diakomihalis et al., makes an application to Greek ports. The authors apply ordinal logistic regression and one-way ANOVA, combined with DEA. On the input side, they use four types of financial ratios, dealing, respectively, with liquidity, activity profitability, and viability. The authors observed that the four ordinal logistic regressions did not show any differences in the evaluation of port efficiency; there was a difference in the fixed assets ratio between the pre-crisis and in-crisis years. In addition, the DEA results suggest that the ports remain inefficient, though the scores for the pre-crisis, in-crisis, and the entire period of investigation vary. One certain implication is that the government should introduce at least some element of private management if the ports are to maintain or increase their efficiency. The third paper on port efficiency, by Görçün, focuses on the Black Sea container ports. Two multi-criteria decision-making models are applied: the first consists of the entropy and OCRA technique, while the second model consists of the Entropy and EATWIOS method. A long list of input factors is considered, next to the outputs. It can be seen that output factors are more MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT 2021, VOL. 48, NO. 5, 607–609 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1953176
关于“港口和海运的当前问题”的特刊
本期特刊是2019年在孟买举行的世界运输研究大会的成果。它汇集了一系列八篇论文,每篇论文都涉及港口和/或海上运输的一个当前问题。其中六篇论文涉及基础设施和码头效率,这清楚地说明,在船舶数量不断增加、规模越来越大的航运公司的压力越来越大的今天,效率在港口世界是多么重要。第二个问题是气候,尤其是运输和航运,是主要排放的最重要来源。第三个也是最后一个问题是港口合作,特别是着眼于内陆地区。这些论文的共同之处在于,它们都使用了不同的建模方法来回答它们的主要研究问题。第一篇论文由van Hassel等人撰写,重点关注船舶尺寸增加对更大基础设施需求的影响,特别是巴拿马运河的扩建。这条运河和苏伊士运河是连接世界各大洲的两条捷径之一。因此,它的瓶颈作用的影响,一方面,或它的扩张,另一方面,甚至在地球的另一边都能感受到。本文展示了扩建后的巴拿马运河如何使美国的港口竞争完全颠倒,同时也影响了其他大洲的港口竞争。在美国,在与欧洲的贸易中,美国东海岸的港口突然出现在美国腹地的大部分地区。当然,在与亚洲的贸易中,道理也是反过来的。但更引人注目的是,尽管这一转变幅度较小,但它对欧洲内部港口的竞争产生了影响。至于港口,关于这个问题的四篇论文处理了一个港口效率的案例研究。这四篇论文也采用了不同的方法,并与不同的因素进行了联系。第一篇论文由Fernández等人撰写,对西班牙港口进行了分析。作者采用两阶段DEA方法,并与容器专业化联系起来。西班牙港口在货物专业化方面似乎具有高度的异质性。在产出方面,主要的商品类型,因为他们塑造航运市场被使用。在投入方面,使用了两个因素:劳动力和中间消费。高度复杂的端口似乎具有更高的整体效率。低复杂度端口的纯技术效率高于整体技术效率。第三,可以观察到,在过去的几十年里,港口之间的技术已经融合。研究得出的主要结论是,产能过剩是一个大问题,尤其是在较小的港口。由Diakomihalis等人撰写的第二篇港口效率论文对希腊港口进行了应用。作者采用有序逻辑回归和单因素方差分析,并结合DEA。在投入方面,他们使用四种类型的财务比率,分别处理流动性、活动盈利能力和生存能力。作者观察到,四种有序逻辑回归对港口效率的评价没有任何差异;在危机前和危机中,固定资产比率存在差异。此外,DEA的结果表明,尽管在危机前、危机中和整个调查期间的得分各不相同,但港口仍然效率低下。一个明确的暗示是,如果港口要保持或提高效率,政府至少应该引入一些私人管理的元素。第三篇关于港口效率的论文,通过Görçün,重点关注黑海集装箱港口。采用了两种多准则决策模型:第一种模型由熵和OCRA技术组成,第二种模型由熵和EATWIOS方法组成。在输出因素旁边考虑一长串输入因素。可以看出,输出因素更多的是MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT 2021, VOL. 48, NO. 5。5、607-609 https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1953176
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.60%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Thirty years ago maritime management decisions were taken on the basis of experience and hunch. Today, the experience is augmented by expert analysis and informed by research findings. Maritime Policy & Management provides the latest findings and analyses, and the opportunity for exchanging views through its Comment Section. A multi-disciplinary and international refereed journal, it brings together papers on the different topics that concern the maritime industry. Emphasis is placed on business, organizational, economic, sociolegal and management topics at port, community, shipping company and shipboard levels. The Journal also provides details of conferences and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信