Indigenous governance structures for maintaining an ecosystem service in an agro-pastoral community in the Indian Trans Himalaya

IF 5.3 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
R. Murali, A. Bijoor, T. Thinley, Kalzang Gurmet, Kesang Chunit, Rinchen Tobge, Tanzin Thuktan, K. Suryawanshi, H. Nagendra, Charudutt Mishra
{"title":"Indigenous governance structures for maintaining an ecosystem service in an agro-pastoral community in the Indian Trans Himalaya","authors":"R. Murali, A. Bijoor, T. Thinley, Kalzang Gurmet, Kesang Chunit, Rinchen Tobge, Tanzin Thuktan, K. Suryawanshi, H. Nagendra, Charudutt Mishra","doi":"10.1080/26395916.2022.2067241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The majority of the global terrestrial biodiversity occurs on indigenous lands, and biodiversity decline on these lands is relatively slower. Yet, robust understanding of indigenous governance systems for biodiversity and ecosystem services remains a key knowledge gap. We used the socio-ecological systems framework to study the governance of ecosystem services (ES) by an indigenous community in the Village of Kibber in the Trans-Himalayan Mountains of India. Focusing on plant-biomass removal from communal pastures, we identified the main factors shaping local governance using in-depth focal and deliberative group discussions with community members. Notwithstanding inequities of caste and gender, we found that Kibber had a well-functioning, complex, relatively democratic and inclusive system, with all households of the village involved in decision-making related to ES governance. Robust systems of information sharing, monitoring, conflict resolution, and self-organization played an important role. We found the role of institutional memory sustained by the oracle to be critical in maintaining governance structures. Our work underscores the potential resilience and importance of indigenous systems for the governance of ecosystem services.","PeriodicalId":37104,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems and People","volume":"18 1","pages":"303 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2067241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The majority of the global terrestrial biodiversity occurs on indigenous lands, and biodiversity decline on these lands is relatively slower. Yet, robust understanding of indigenous governance systems for biodiversity and ecosystem services remains a key knowledge gap. We used the socio-ecological systems framework to study the governance of ecosystem services (ES) by an indigenous community in the Village of Kibber in the Trans-Himalayan Mountains of India. Focusing on plant-biomass removal from communal pastures, we identified the main factors shaping local governance using in-depth focal and deliberative group discussions with community members. Notwithstanding inequities of caste and gender, we found that Kibber had a well-functioning, complex, relatively democratic and inclusive system, with all households of the village involved in decision-making related to ES governance. Robust systems of information sharing, monitoring, conflict resolution, and self-organization played an important role. We found the role of institutional memory sustained by the oracle to be critical in maintaining governance structures. Our work underscores the potential resilience and importance of indigenous systems for the governance of ecosystem services.
印度跨喜马拉雅地区农牧社区维持生态系统服务的土著治理结构
摘要全球陆地生物多样性大部分发生在土著土地上,而这些土地上的生物多样性下降相对较慢。然而,对生物多样性和生态系统服务的土著治理系统的深入了解仍然是一个关键的知识差距。我们使用社会生态系统框架研究了印度跨喜马拉雅山脉Kibber村一个土著社区对生态系统服务的治理。围绕从公共牧场清除植物生物量,我们通过与社区成员进行深入的焦点和协商小组讨论,确定了影响地方治理的主要因素。尽管种姓和性别不平等,我们发现Kibber有一个运作良好、复杂、相对民主和包容的系统,村里的所有家庭都参与了与ES治理相关的决策。强大的信息共享、监测、冲突解决和自组织系统发挥了重要作用。我们发现,由神谕维持的制度记忆在维持治理结构方面发挥着至关重要的作用。我们的工作强调了土著系统对生态系统服务治理的潜在韧性和重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosystems and People
Ecosystems and People Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.30%
发文量
40
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecosystems and People is an interdisciplinary journal that addresses how biodiversity and ecosystems underpin human quality of life, and how societal activities and preferences drive changes in ecosystems. Research published in Ecosystems and People addresses human-nature relationships and social-ecological systems in a broad sense. This embraces research on biodiversity, ecosystem services, their contributions to quality of life, implications for equity and justice, and the diverse and rich ways in which people relate to nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信