Relationship Between the Underlying Factors and the Treatment Results of Platelet-Rich Plasm (PRP) Injection in Degenerative Knee Disease; A Blinded Randomized Study

Q3 Medicine
M. Mardani-Kivi, Ehsan Kazemnejad Leili, Somaye Esnaashari, K. Hashemi-Motlagh, Zoleikha Azari
{"title":"Relationship Between the Underlying Factors and the Treatment Results of Platelet-Rich Plasm (PRP) Injection in Degenerative Knee Disease; A Blinded Randomized Study","authors":"M. Mardani-Kivi, Ehsan Kazemnejad Leili, Somaye Esnaashari, K. Hashemi-Motlagh, Zoleikha Azari","doi":"10.5812/asjsm-120485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To investigate the therapeutic effects of PRP injection + conservative treatment as the intervention group versus normal saline injection + conservative treatment as the control group. Objectives: This study we determined the effects of underlying factors, including age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI), on the therapeutic effects of PRP. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, 60 patients with grade 2 knee OA with an age of 40 - 65 years were enrolled. In the intervention group, leukocyte-poor PRP with double spinning, and in the control group, normal saline was injected with a similar protocol. All patients in both groups were also provided with a conservative protocol, including oral celecoxib 100 mg BID for four weeks, modifying physical activity, and 15 sessions of physiotherapy. Results: Demographic characteristics (age, gender, and BMI) and pre-treatment scores were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The WOMAC score was improved from pre-treatment to first week post-treatment in both groups (from 54.89 ± 3.4 to 64.9 ± 3.7 in the intervention group and from 53.7 ± 3.1 to 63.8 ± 3.9 in the control group). It means that PRP + conservative treatment was effective, similar to normal saline + conservative treatment. After adjusting BMI as an underlying variable, it was indicated that in the patients with lower BMI, PRP + conservative provided a better outcome in comparison to saline + conservative treatment (P = 0.014 and P = 0.019, respectively). Also, the comparison of functional scores changes with age as an underlying variable, demonstrating that younger cases obtained a better response from PRP + conservative rather than normal saline + conservative (P = 0.012 and P = 0.007, respectively). Conclusions: PRP seems to be an appropriate choice for treatment of moderate osteoarthritis, especially in younger patients and those with lower BMI.","PeriodicalId":8847,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm-120485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the therapeutic effects of PRP injection + conservative treatment as the intervention group versus normal saline injection + conservative treatment as the control group. Objectives: This study we determined the effects of underlying factors, including age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI), on the therapeutic effects of PRP. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, 60 patients with grade 2 knee OA with an age of 40 - 65 years were enrolled. In the intervention group, leukocyte-poor PRP with double spinning, and in the control group, normal saline was injected with a similar protocol. All patients in both groups were also provided with a conservative protocol, including oral celecoxib 100 mg BID for four weeks, modifying physical activity, and 15 sessions of physiotherapy. Results: Demographic characteristics (age, gender, and BMI) and pre-treatment scores were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The WOMAC score was improved from pre-treatment to first week post-treatment in both groups (from 54.89 ± 3.4 to 64.9 ± 3.7 in the intervention group and from 53.7 ± 3.1 to 63.8 ± 3.9 in the control group). It means that PRP + conservative treatment was effective, similar to normal saline + conservative treatment. After adjusting BMI as an underlying variable, it was indicated that in the patients with lower BMI, PRP + conservative provided a better outcome in comparison to saline + conservative treatment (P = 0.014 and P = 0.019, respectively). Also, the comparison of functional scores changes with age as an underlying variable, demonstrating that younger cases obtained a better response from PRP + conservative rather than normal saline + conservative (P = 0.012 and P = 0.007, respectively). Conclusions: PRP seems to be an appropriate choice for treatment of moderate osteoarthritis, especially in younger patients and those with lower BMI.
目的探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)注射治疗膝关节退行性病变的疗效;一项随机盲法研究
背景:观察PRP注射液+保守治疗作为干预组与生理盐水注射液+保守疗法作为对照组的疗效。目的:本研究确定了包括年龄、性别和体重指数(BMI)在内的潜在因素对PRP治疗效果的影响。方法:在这项单盲随机临床试验中,60名年龄在40-65岁的2级膝关节骨性关节炎患者被纳入研究。在干预组中,白细胞贫乏的PRP采用双旋,在对照组中,用类似的方案注射生理盐水。两组的所有患者也接受了保守方案,包括口服塞来昔布100 mg BID,持续四周,调整体力活动,以及15次物理治疗。结果:两组的人口学特征(年龄、性别和BMI)和治疗前评分相似(均P>0.05)。两组的WOMAC评分从治疗前到治疗后第一周均有改善(干预组从54.89±3.4提高到64.9±3.7,对照组从53.7±3.1提高到63.8±3.9)。这意味着PRP+保守治疗是有效的,类似于生理盐水+保守治疗。在将BMI作为一个潜在变量进行调整后,研究表明,在BMI较低的患者中,与生理盐水+保守治疗相比,PRP+保守治疗提供了更好的结果(分别为P=0.014和P=0.019)。此外,功能评分的比较随着年龄作为一个潜在变量而变化,表明年轻病例从PRP+保守治疗中获得的反应比生理盐水+保守治疗更好(分别为P=0.012和P=0.007)。结论:PRP似乎是治疗中度骨关节炎的合适选择,尤其是在年轻患者和BMI较低的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信