Who is listening to WHO?

C. Flodmark
{"title":"Who is listening to WHO?","authors":"C. Flodmark","doi":"10.1080/2574254X.2018.1477495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been numerous attempts by the WHO (World Health Organization) to recognize and support actions to fight obesity. However, it was not until 1995 that the WHO identified overweight as the most significant cause of ill health rather than underweight in many developing countries. In the first special obesity consultation in 1997 the escalating medical costs globally were highlighted [1]. The conclusion was that overweight and obesity were replacing more traditional problems such as undernutrition and infectious diseases as the most significant causes of ill-health [2]. Obesity comorbidities such as coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke, certain types of cancer, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, gallbladder disease, dyslipidaemia, osteoarthritis and gout, pulmonary disease including sleep apnoea were given as examples in the 1997 special obesity consultation. Furthermore, individuals with obesity suffered from social bias, prejudice and discrimination, by both the general public and health professionals [2]. In spite of this awareness neither local governments nor the WHO have been successful in changing the societal framework to promote routine spontaneous physical activity and transforming the food system. Low energy-density food of high nutrient quality has not become the norm [1]. There was an interesting attempt in Istanbul to engage the broad European political level [3]. The Swedish government presented 79 steps to engage different parts of the society with actions divided into different political areas [4]. The different responsible bodies in the Swedish proposals were the national government, local governments, different authorities (national board of health, national board of public health, regulator authority for buildings, national school authority, traffic authority, food authority, agriculture authority, consumer authority etc.), national sports associations, health care etc. The principle to point out specific parts of the society as responsible, regardless if it was a state authority or an association, gave a good possibility to plan future actions. However, no financial support was given, and no specific actions were ever taken. The WHO Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity has proposed an implementation plan [5], which was approved by the 70 World Health Assembly on 31 May 2017. It pointed out that almost three quarters of the 42 million children under 5 years who are overweight CHILD AND ADOLESCENT OBESITY 2018, VOL. 1, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/2574254X.2018.1477495","PeriodicalId":72570,"journal":{"name":"Child and adolescent obesity (Abingdon, England)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2574254X.2018.1477495","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and adolescent obesity (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2574254X.2018.1477495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

There have been numerous attempts by the WHO (World Health Organization) to recognize and support actions to fight obesity. However, it was not until 1995 that the WHO identified overweight as the most significant cause of ill health rather than underweight in many developing countries. In the first special obesity consultation in 1997 the escalating medical costs globally were highlighted [1]. The conclusion was that overweight and obesity were replacing more traditional problems such as undernutrition and infectious diseases as the most significant causes of ill-health [2]. Obesity comorbidities such as coronary heart disease, hypertension and stroke, certain types of cancer, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, gallbladder disease, dyslipidaemia, osteoarthritis and gout, pulmonary disease including sleep apnoea were given as examples in the 1997 special obesity consultation. Furthermore, individuals with obesity suffered from social bias, prejudice and discrimination, by both the general public and health professionals [2]. In spite of this awareness neither local governments nor the WHO have been successful in changing the societal framework to promote routine spontaneous physical activity and transforming the food system. Low energy-density food of high nutrient quality has not become the norm [1]. There was an interesting attempt in Istanbul to engage the broad European political level [3]. The Swedish government presented 79 steps to engage different parts of the society with actions divided into different political areas [4]. The different responsible bodies in the Swedish proposals were the national government, local governments, different authorities (national board of health, national board of public health, regulator authority for buildings, national school authority, traffic authority, food authority, agriculture authority, consumer authority etc.), national sports associations, health care etc. The principle to point out specific parts of the society as responsible, regardless if it was a state authority or an association, gave a good possibility to plan future actions. However, no financial support was given, and no specific actions were ever taken. The WHO Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity has proposed an implementation plan [5], which was approved by the 70 World Health Assembly on 31 May 2017. It pointed out that almost three quarters of the 42 million children under 5 years who are overweight CHILD AND ADOLESCENT OBESITY 2018, VOL. 1, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/2574254X.2018.1477495
谁在听世卫组织?
世界卫生组织(WHO)曾多次尝试承认并支持与肥胖作斗争的行动。然而,直到1995年,世界卫生组织才确定,在许多发展中国家,导致健康状况不佳的最重要原因是超重,而不是体重不足。在1997年的第一次肥胖症特别咨询中,全球不断上涨的医疗费用得到了强调。结论是,超重和肥胖正在取代营养不良和传染病等更传统的问题,成为健康状况不佳的最重要原因。肥胖症的合并症,例如冠心病、高血压和中风、某些类型的癌症、非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病、胆囊疾病、血脂异常、骨关节炎和痛风、包括睡眠呼吸暂停在内的肺部疾病,在1997年的肥胖症特别咨询中被列为例子。此外,肥胖患者还受到社会偏见、偏见和歧视,无论是公众还是卫生专业人员都是如此。尽管有这种意识,但地方政府和世界卫生组织都未能成功地改变社会框架,以促进日常自发的身体活动和改变粮食系统。低能量密度、高营养质量的食品还没有成为标准食品。在伊斯坦布尔有一个有趣的尝试,那就是与广泛的欧洲政治层面进行接触。瑞典政府提出了79个步骤,让社会的不同部分参与进来,并将行动划分为不同的政治领域。瑞典提案中的不同负责机构是国家政府、地方政府、不同主管部门(国家卫生委员会、国家公共卫生委员会、建筑管理部门、国家学校主管部门、交通主管部门、食品主管部门、农业主管部门、消费者主管部门等)、国家体育协会、保健部门等。不管是国家当局还是协会,指出社会的特定部分负有责任的原则,为计划未来的行动提供了很好的可能性。但是,没有提供任何财政支持,也没有采取任何具体行动。世卫组织终止儿童肥胖委员会提出了一项实施计划b[5],该计划于2017年5月31日获得第七十届世界卫生大会批准。报告指出,在4200万名5岁以下超重儿童中,近四分之三的人患有儿童和青少年肥胖,2018年第1卷,第1期。1,1 - 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/2574254X.2018.1477495
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信