{"title":"From Guild to Society: The Foundation of Confrerie Pictura in The Hague Revisited","authors":"P. Bakker","doi":"10.18352/EMLC.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The foundation of the Confrerie Pictura (an artistic brotherhood) in The Hague has given rise to controversy on several occasions. In the eighteenth century, for example, Johan van Gool was annoyed by Houbraken, who believed that the artist painters of The Hague had founded their Confrerie in 1662, while it was abundantly clear to Van Gool that the correct date was 1656. Nowadays the question under discussion is the nature of the Confrerie as an organisation. Was it the first step towards an eighteenth-century society, as Hoogewerff suggested in his authoritative book on the Dutch St Luke’s guilds, or was the new organisation more like a guild, as later argued by Hoogewerff’s most important critic Hessel Miedema? Based on archival records, this article maps out the early history and establishment of the Confrerie in order to determine what kind of organisation it had been between 1656 and 1700. This article argues that all four authors are right: the Confrerie was both a guild and a society, and however paradoxical it may sound, it was founded in 1656 and again in 1662.","PeriodicalId":37252,"journal":{"name":"Early Modern Low Countries","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Modern Low Countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/EMLC.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The foundation of the Confrerie Pictura (an artistic brotherhood) in The Hague has given rise to controversy on several occasions. In the eighteenth century, for example, Johan van Gool was annoyed by Houbraken, who believed that the artist painters of The Hague had founded their Confrerie in 1662, while it was abundantly clear to Van Gool that the correct date was 1656. Nowadays the question under discussion is the nature of the Confrerie as an organisation. Was it the first step towards an eighteenth-century society, as Hoogewerff suggested in his authoritative book on the Dutch St Luke’s guilds, or was the new organisation more like a guild, as later argued by Hoogewerff’s most important critic Hessel Miedema? Based on archival records, this article maps out the early history and establishment of the Confrerie in order to determine what kind of organisation it had been between 1656 and 1700. This article argues that all four authors are right: the Confrerie was both a guild and a society, and however paradoxical it may sound, it was founded in 1656 and again in 1662.
艺术兄弟会Confrerie Pictura在海牙的成立曾多次引发争议。例如,在18世纪,Johan van Gool对Houbraken感到恼火,他认为海牙的艺术家和画家在1662年建立了他们的Confrerie,而van Gool非常清楚,正确的日期是1656年。现在讨论的问题是Confrerie作为一个组织的性质。这是迈向18世纪社会的第一步,正如胡在其关于荷兰圣卢克公会的权威著作中所建议的那样,还是像胡最重要的评论家赫塞尔·米德玛后来所说的那样,新组织更像一个公会?根据档案记录,本文绘制了Confrerie的早期历史和建立,以确定它在1656年至1700年间是一个什么样的组织。这篇文章认为,四位作者都是对的:Confrerie既是一个公会,也是一个社会,无论听起来多么矛盾,它成立于1656年,再次成立于1662年。