The Plague of Bannonism

IF 0.4 3区社会学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Critical Review Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI:10.1080/08913811.2019.1671681

Ronald S. Beiner

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Donald Trump’s thinking is too erratic and scattershot to count as a real system of ideas. Steve Bannon’s version of populism seems significantly more focused, more self-conscious, and hence more open to theory-based critical analysis, which this paper attempts to provide. That is not at all to say, however, that Bannon’s ideas achieve intellectual coherence or consistency. Close examination of the defining components of his worldview suggest the opposite. Still, engagement with contemporary right-populism cannot, or should not, avoid Bannon and his attempts to cook up a new ideology.

查看原文本刊更多论文

禁令主义的瘟疫

摘要唐纳德·特朗普的思想太过飘忽不定和散漫，无法算作一个真正的思想体系。史蒂夫·班农版本的民粹主义似乎更加专注，更加自觉，因此对本文试图提供的基于理论的批判性分析更加开放。然而，这并不是说班农的思想实现了思想上的连贯性或一致性。仔细研究他的世界观的决定性组成部分，会发现恰恰相反。尽管如此，与当代右翼民粹主义的接触不能也不应该避免班农及其炮制新意识形态的企图。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society is a political-science journal dedicated to advancing political theory with an epistemological bent. Recurrent questions discussed in our pages include: How can political actors know what they need to know to effect positive social change? What are the sources of political actors’ beliefs? Are these sources reliable? Critical Review is the only journal in which the ideational determinants of political behavior are investigated empirically as well as being assessed for their normative implications. Thus, while normative political theorists are the main contributors to Critical Review, we also publish scholarship on the realities of public opinion, the media, technocratic decision making, ideological reasoning, and other empirical phenomena.