Between Psychoanalysis and History: The Cultural Legacy of Toni Morrison in Modern Black Horror

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kevin Pyon
{"title":"Between Psychoanalysis and History: The Cultural Legacy of Toni Morrison in Modern Black Horror","authors":"Kevin Pyon","doi":"10.1080/00497878.2022.2162054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I This essay considers the cultural legacy of Toni Morrison in modern Black horror by exploring the artistic and political lineage between Playing in the Dark (1992) and Beloved (1987) and the film Candyman (2021), co-written and directed by Nia DaCosta. 1 Throughout her career, Morrison sought to unsettle the conventional boundaries between psychoanalytic and historical discourses, a critical and literary endeavor which comprised a conception of the history and legacy of racial slavery as a (genre of) horror. Whereas Playing in the Dark revises Freudian concepts of the unconscious, repression, and dreams to rethink the universal psychoanalytic subject as a transhistorical racialized subject, Beloved unveils the moral panic over the emergence of the so-called “urban underclass” as the resurfacing of the repressed memory of racial slavery from the American unconscious. In her reboot of Bernard Rose’s 1992 Candyman , DaCosta takes up Morrison’s cultural legacy by depicting a Black male protagonist whose confrontation with the horror of racial slavery leads to an existential collapse of the boundary between his personal psyche and the enslaved past, ultimately resulting in his monstrous transformation into Candyman. In what follows, this essay begins by interrogating the longstanding reception","PeriodicalId":45212,"journal":{"name":"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2022.2162054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I This essay considers the cultural legacy of Toni Morrison in modern Black horror by exploring the artistic and political lineage between Playing in the Dark (1992) and Beloved (1987) and the film Candyman (2021), co-written and directed by Nia DaCosta. 1 Throughout her career, Morrison sought to unsettle the conventional boundaries between psychoanalytic and historical discourses, a critical and literary endeavor which comprised a conception of the history and legacy of racial slavery as a (genre of) horror. Whereas Playing in the Dark revises Freudian concepts of the unconscious, repression, and dreams to rethink the universal psychoanalytic subject as a transhistorical racialized subject, Beloved unveils the moral panic over the emergence of the so-called “urban underclass” as the resurfacing of the repressed memory of racial slavery from the American unconscious. In her reboot of Bernard Rose’s 1992 Candyman , DaCosta takes up Morrison’s cultural legacy by depicting a Black male protagonist whose confrontation with the horror of racial slavery leads to an existential collapse of the boundary between his personal psyche and the enslaved past, ultimately resulting in his monstrous transformation into Candyman. In what follows, this essay begins by interrogating the longstanding reception
在精神分析与历史之间:托妮·莫里森在现代黑人恐怖中的文化遗产
本文通过探索《在黑暗中玩耍》(1992)和《宠儿》(1987)以及妮娅·达科斯塔联合编剧和导演的电影《糖果人》(2021)之间的艺术和政治渊源,考虑了托妮·莫里森在现代黑人恐怖中的文化遗产。在她的整个职业生涯中,莫里森试图打破精神分析和历史话语之间的传统界限,这是一种批判和文学上的努力,其中包括将种族奴隶制的历史和遗产作为一种恐怖类型的概念。《在黑暗中玩耍》修正了弗洛伊德关于无意识、压抑和梦的概念,重新思考了普遍的精神分析主体作为一个超历史的种族化主体,而《宠儿》揭示了所谓的“城市下层阶级”的出现所带来的道德恐慌,这是美国无意识中被压抑的种族奴隶制记忆的重新出现。在这部改编自伯纳德•罗斯1992年作品《糖果人》的电影中,达科斯塔继承了莫里森的文化遗产,描绘了一个黑人男主角,他与种族奴役的恐怖对峙,导致他的个人精神和被奴役的过去之间的存在性界限崩溃,最终导致他变成了糖果人。在接下来的文章中,本文首先对长期以来的接受提出质疑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL
WOMENS STUDIES-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信