{"title":"Bartolomé de las Casas: Entre la utopía y el derecho abstracto","authors":"Juan Ignacio Arias Krause","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.181-200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": What has been called the “second conversion” of Bartolomé de las Casas is a milestone that has served us to present an epistemological break that occurs in the Dominican’s thought. It is the transition from a utopian project –which seeks to achieve a model of social abundance based on a community between Spaniards and indigenous people– to another, which pursues the recognition of otherness (through the principles of equality and freedom) using legal thinking based on theological and cultural sources. What links both positions is a break with the social and political reality of the time, not only in Spain but especially in America. The clash between thought, whether utopian or juridical, with the material basis sustaining the political reality of the time will provoke an unavoidable “hiatus” in the practical application of his theory.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.181-200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
: What has been called the “second conversion” of Bartolomé de las Casas is a milestone that has served us to present an epistemological break that occurs in the Dominican’s thought. It is the transition from a utopian project –which seeks to achieve a model of social abundance based on a community between Spaniards and indigenous people– to another, which pursues the recognition of otherness (through the principles of equality and freedom) using legal thinking based on theological and cultural sources. What links both positions is a break with the social and political reality of the time, not only in Spain but especially in America. The clash between thought, whether utopian or juridical, with the material basis sustaining the political reality of the time will provoke an unavoidable “hiatus” in the practical application of his theory.
:Bartoloméde las Casas的“第二次皈依”是一个里程碑,它帮助我们呈现了多明尼加思想中发生的认识论突破。这是从一个乌托邦项目向另一个项目的过渡,该项目寻求建立在西班牙人和土著人民之间的社区基础上的社会富足模式,该项目利用基于神学和文化来源的法律思维(通过平等和自由原则)追求对他人性的承认。将这两种立场联系在一起的是与当时的社会和政治现实的决裂,不仅在西班牙,尤其是在美国。思想,无论是乌托邦的还是法律的,与维持当时政治现实的物质基础之间的冲突,将在他的理论的实际应用中引发不可避免的“中断”。