Context is king: Facilitation in innovation projects. A comparison between academic and industry projects

Q2 Engineering
R. Pabst, Isabelle Tyrasa, Sebastian G. M. Händschke, Ralph Siepmann, A. Gonera
{"title":"Context is king: Facilitation in innovation projects. A comparison between academic and industry projects","authors":"R. Pabst, Isabelle Tyrasa, Sebastian G. M. Händschke, Ralph Siepmann, A. Gonera","doi":"10.24840/2183-0606_008.003_0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the recent years, the importance of innovation in academic R&D projects has increased. Nevertheless, innovation facilitation in the academic field has rarely been researched. Currently, innovation support focuses on the industrial context. In our study we aim to address this research gap and examine the facilitation of innovation in the academic and the industrial context. In our abductive empirical case study, we investigate the role, skills, mindset and instruments of innovation facilitators by interviewing 25 individuals from nine organizations. We discovered different behaviors and perspectives in dealing with innovation work, depending on the context of the either academic or industry-driven projects. Academic innovation projects focus on feasibility, whereas industry-driven projects focus on viability. In both contexts, the facilitators usually intend to include the user perspective (desirability). With our results we contribute to the facilitation literature and show that innovation projects and their facilitation depend on their specific context and the mentality of the facilitators. With these results, we strive to improve academic and industry-driven projects with advice for innovation practitioners and facilitators on helpful tools and important perspectives to fully exploit the innovation potential.","PeriodicalId":33389,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_008.003_0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the recent years, the importance of innovation in academic R&D projects has increased. Nevertheless, innovation facilitation in the academic field has rarely been researched. Currently, innovation support focuses on the industrial context. In our study we aim to address this research gap and examine the facilitation of innovation in the academic and the industrial context. In our abductive empirical case study, we investigate the role, skills, mindset and instruments of innovation facilitators by interviewing 25 individuals from nine organizations. We discovered different behaviors and perspectives in dealing with innovation work, depending on the context of the either academic or industry-driven projects. Academic innovation projects focus on feasibility, whereas industry-driven projects focus on viability. In both contexts, the facilitators usually intend to include the user perspective (desirability). With our results we contribute to the facilitation literature and show that innovation projects and their facilitation depend on their specific context and the mentality of the facilitators. With these results, we strive to improve academic and industry-driven projects with advice for innovation practitioners and facilitators on helpful tools and important perspectives to fully exploit the innovation potential.
情境为王:促进创新项目。学术和工业项目的比较
近年来,创新在学术研发项目中的重要性日益增加。然而,学术界对创新促进的研究却很少。目前,创新支持主要集中在产业背景下。在我们的研究中,我们旨在解决这一研究差距,并在学术和工业背景下研究创新的促进性。在我们的溯因实证案例研究中,我们通过采访来自9个组织的25个人来调查创新促进者的角色、技能、心态和工具。我们在处理创新工作时发现了不同的行为和观点,这取决于学术或行业驱动项目的背景。学术创新项目侧重于可行性,而产业驱动项目侧重于可行性。在这两种情况下,促进者通常打算包括用户视角(可取性)。通过我们的研究结果,我们对促进文献做出了贡献,并表明创新项目及其促进取决于其具体背景和促进者的心态。有了这些成果,我们努力改进学术和行业驱动的项目,为创新实践者和促进者提供有用的工具和重要的观点,以充分发挥创新潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Innovation Management
Journal of Innovation Management Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信