Case Series: Cystic Brain Metastases Managed With Reservoir Placement and Stereotactic Radiosurgery

David J. Park, Prashin Unadkat, A. Goenka, M. Schulder
{"title":"Case Series: Cystic Brain Metastases Managed With Reservoir Placement and Stereotactic Radiosurgery","authors":"David J. Park, Prashin Unadkat, A. Goenka, M. Schulder","doi":"10.1093/neuopn/okab028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become one of the mainstays of treatment for patients with metastatic brain tumors. However, metastatic tumors with a large cystic component often exceed the size limit for safe and effective SRS. In such cases, surgical resection may not be the preferred first method of treatment, due to tumor location, patient co-morbidities, and patient preference. In these patients, volume reduction by cyst aspiration (CA) followed by SRS may be a viable alternative treatment option.\n \n \n \n To present the treatment of patients with cystic metastases using reservoir placement followed by SRS.\n \n \n \n Nine patients were treated with this method. We performed reservoir insertion for the aspiration of cystic component in each patient and followed that with outpatient SRS.\n \n \n \n Mean overall volume reduction from this treatment method was 78.5%. Mean volume reduction from the CA alone was 59.8%, and after SRS, a further 66.6%, accounting for some cyst reaccumulation between the time of surgery and SRS. Repeat reservoir aspiration was done a total of 10 times in 5 patients. Our study showed local tumor control in 7 of 9 patients (77.8%), while 2 patients required later surgical resection of their tumors.\n \n \n \n CA with reservoir placement followed by SRS is a good option for patients with large cystic brain metastases. The reservoir allows for repeat aspiration if needed. Catheter placement at the center of the cyst, and SRS within 2 to 3 wk of surgery, can maximize the likelihood of a successful outcome.\n","PeriodicalId":93342,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuopn/okab028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become one of the mainstays of treatment for patients with metastatic brain tumors. However, metastatic tumors with a large cystic component often exceed the size limit for safe and effective SRS. In such cases, surgical resection may not be the preferred first method of treatment, due to tumor location, patient co-morbidities, and patient preference. In these patients, volume reduction by cyst aspiration (CA) followed by SRS may be a viable alternative treatment option. To present the treatment of patients with cystic metastases using reservoir placement followed by SRS. Nine patients were treated with this method. We performed reservoir insertion for the aspiration of cystic component in each patient and followed that with outpatient SRS. Mean overall volume reduction from this treatment method was 78.5%. Mean volume reduction from the CA alone was 59.8%, and after SRS, a further 66.6%, accounting for some cyst reaccumulation between the time of surgery and SRS. Repeat reservoir aspiration was done a total of 10 times in 5 patients. Our study showed local tumor control in 7 of 9 patients (77.8%), while 2 patients required later surgical resection of their tumors. CA with reservoir placement followed by SRS is a good option for patients with large cystic brain metastases. The reservoir allows for repeat aspiration if needed. Catheter placement at the center of the cyst, and SRS within 2 to 3 wk of surgery, can maximize the likelihood of a successful outcome.
病例系列:囊性脑转移瘤的储存库放置和立体定向放射手术治疗
立体定向放射外科(SRS)已成为治疗转移性脑肿瘤的主要手段之一。然而,具有较大囊性成分的转移性肿瘤通常超过安全有效SRS的大小限制。在这种情况下,由于肿瘤的位置、患者合并症和患者的偏好,手术切除可能不是首选的第一治疗方法。在这些患者中,通过囊肿抽吸(CA)减少体积,然后进行SRS可能是一种可行的替代治疗选择。介绍囊性转移患者的治疗方法,采用储液池放置和SRS。采用此法治疗9例。我们对每位患者进行储液器插入以吸出囊性成分,随后进行门诊SRS。该处理方法的平均总体积缩小率为78.5%。单独CA的平均体积减少为59.8%,SRS后的平均体积减少为66.6%,说明在手术时间和SRS之间有一些囊肿再堆积。5例患者共进行10次重复储液抽吸。我们的研究显示,9例患者中有7例(77.8%)局部肿瘤得到控制,而2例患者需要手术切除肿瘤。对于有较大囊性脑转移的患者,CA与储层放置后的SRS是一个很好的选择。如果需要,储液器允许重复抽吸。在囊肿中心放置导管,并在手术后2至3周内进行SRS,可以最大限度地提高成功结果的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信