Biodiversity of weed communities in common wheat and spelt following various forecrops

IF 2.1 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Acta Agrobotanica Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI:10.5586/AA.1751
M. Wanic, Mariola Parzonka, D. Załuski
{"title":"Biodiversity of weed communities in common wheat and spelt following various forecrops","authors":"M. Wanic, Mariola Parzonka, D. Załuski","doi":"10.5586/AA.1751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmentally-friendly solutions are increasingly often applied in crop cultivation technologies. These include, among others, the return of old crops (e.g., spelt wheat) and crop rotation. Ensuring a proper forecrop is essential, especially in the cultivation of winter wheat, which is susceptible to infestation by weeds. However, there is only sparse information on infestation by weeds in the cultivation of winter spelt. In this study, it was assumed that this crop is invaded by weeds to a lesser extent than wheat, especially after unfavorable forecrops. The study was based on a field experiment conducted in the east part of Poland. The aim was to compare the weed infestation of common wheat and spelt wheat grown after peas, oilseed rape, and after itself. Analyses of weed infestation were conducted in 2014–2016. The weed species composition and population size were determined as well as their dry weight. The following indices were calculated: index of species richness, Simpson’s domination index, Shannon–Wiener index of species diversity, and Pielou’s index of evenness. The weed infestation of spelt wheat was higher than that of common wheat during the tillering stage. It was similar in both species during the heading stage. The lowest weed infestation in both cereals was observed on a field where peas had grown. Growing after oilseed rape and after themselves contributed to an increase in weed infestation. Biomass of weeds in a field of spelt was similar after all forecrops, unlike that in wheat, where more biomass was observed after oilseed rape and wheat. A greater share of Apera spica-venti and Viola arvensis was observed in common wheat and spelt grown after oilseed rape and after themselves. Weed communities in spelt were more diverse than in wheat. The forecrops did not differentiate the species diversity in either crop.","PeriodicalId":6907,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agrobotanica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agrobotanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5586/AA.1751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Environmentally-friendly solutions are increasingly often applied in crop cultivation technologies. These include, among others, the return of old crops (e.g., spelt wheat) and crop rotation. Ensuring a proper forecrop is essential, especially in the cultivation of winter wheat, which is susceptible to infestation by weeds. However, there is only sparse information on infestation by weeds in the cultivation of winter spelt. In this study, it was assumed that this crop is invaded by weeds to a lesser extent than wheat, especially after unfavorable forecrops. The study was based on a field experiment conducted in the east part of Poland. The aim was to compare the weed infestation of common wheat and spelt wheat grown after peas, oilseed rape, and after itself. Analyses of weed infestation were conducted in 2014–2016. The weed species composition and population size were determined as well as their dry weight. The following indices were calculated: index of species richness, Simpson’s domination index, Shannon–Wiener index of species diversity, and Pielou’s index of evenness. The weed infestation of spelt wheat was higher than that of common wheat during the tillering stage. It was similar in both species during the heading stage. The lowest weed infestation in both cereals was observed on a field where peas had grown. Growing after oilseed rape and after themselves contributed to an increase in weed infestation. Biomass of weeds in a field of spelt was similar after all forecrops, unlike that in wheat, where more biomass was observed after oilseed rape and wheat. A greater share of Apera spica-venti and Viola arvensis was observed in common wheat and spelt grown after oilseed rape and after themselves. Weed communities in spelt were more diverse than in wheat. The forecrops did not differentiate the species diversity in either crop.
常见小麦和不同前作物拼写的杂草群落的生物多样性
环境友好型解决方案越来越多地应用于作物栽培技术。除其他外,这些措施包括恢复旧作物(如斯佩尔特小麦)和轮作。确保适当的预收是至关重要的,特别是在冬小麦的种植中,冬小麦容易受到杂草的侵害。然而,关于冬小麦栽培中杂草侵害的资料很少。在本研究中,我们假设该作物受杂草侵害的程度低于小麦,尤其是在歉收之后。这项研究是基于在波兰东部进行的实地试验。目的是比较普通小麦和在豌豆、油菜和自己之后种植的拼写小麦的杂草侵扰情况。2014-2016年进行了杂草侵害分析。测定了杂草的种类组成、种群大小和干重。计算了物种丰富度指数、Simpson优势度指数、Shannon-Wiener物种多样性指数和Pielou均匀度指数。在分蘖期,小麦的杂草侵染率高于普通小麦。在抽穗期,两种植物的生长特征相似。在种植了豌豆的田地里,观察到两种谷物的杂草侵扰最低。油菜后种植和油菜后种植都增加了杂草的侵害。不同于小麦,不同于油菜和小麦,小麦的生物量更多。在普通小麦和斯佩尔特小麦中,在油菜之后和油菜之后生长的辣椒和紫辣椒所占的比例更高。斯佩尔特小麦的杂草群落多样性高于小麦。前茬作物对两种作物的物种多样性没有区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Agrobotanica
Acta Agrobotanica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Agrobotanica publishes mainly significant, original research papers presenting the results new to the biology of cultivable or wild plants accompanying crops. The submissions dedicated particularly to flora and phytocenoses of anthropogenically transformed areas, bee pastures, nectariferous and polleniferous taxa, plant-pollinator relationships, urban and rural habitats for entomofauna, cultivated plants, weeds, aerobiology, plant pathogens and parasites are encouraged and accepted. Besides the original research papers, authors may submit short communications and reviews. The journal also publishes the invited papers in case of new developments in plant science. All submissions must be written in good English, which is solely a responsibility of the authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信