Everolimus Exposure as a Predictor of Toxicity in Renal Cell Cancer Patients in the Adjuvant Setting: Results of a Pharmacokinetic Analysis for SWOG S0931 (EVEREST), a Phase III Study (NCT01120249)

IF 1.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Kidney Cancer Pub Date : 2019-04-05 DOI:10.3233/KCA-180049
T. Synold, M. Plets, C. Tangen, E. Heath, G. Palapattu, P. Mack, M. Stein, M. Meng, P. Lara, N. Vogelzang, I. Thompson, C. Ryan
{"title":"Everolimus Exposure as a Predictor of Toxicity in Renal Cell Cancer Patients in the Adjuvant Setting: Results of a Pharmacokinetic Analysis for SWOG S0931 (EVEREST), a Phase III Study (NCT01120249)","authors":"T. Synold, M. Plets, C. Tangen, E. Heath, G. Palapattu, P. Mack, M. Stein, M. Meng, P. Lara, N. Vogelzang, I. Thompson, C. Ryan","doi":"10.3233/KCA-180049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: S0931 is assessing recurrence-free survival in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients randomized to receive everolimus (EVE) versus placebo for one year following nephrectomy. Due to a higher than expected dropout rate, we assessed EVE trough levels in the adjuvant setting to evaluate the relationship between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity. Methods: Patients received 10 mg daily EVE for nine 6-week cycles. Pre-dose whole blood samples were collected pre-cycle 2 and pre-cycle 3 and analyzed for EVE. Patients with pre-cycle 2 and/or pre-cycle 3 EVE results were used in the analysis. Patients were segregated into quartiles (Q) based on EVE levels and logistic regression was used to model the most common adverse event outcomes using EVE trough as a predictor. Hazard and odds ratios were adjusted for age, BMI and performance status. Results: A total of 467 patients were included in this analysis. Quartiles normalized to an EVE dose of 10 mg/day were < 9.0, 9.0–12.9, 12.9–22.8, and > 22.8 ng/mL, respectively. EVE trough levels increased with increasing age (p < 0.001). Furthermore, EVE trough levels were higher in men than women (19.4 versus 15.4 ng/mL, p = 0.01). Risk of grade 2 + triglycerides was increased in Q2 and Q3 vs Q1 (OR = 2.08; p = 0.02 and OR = 2.63; p = 0.002). Risk of grade 2 + rash was increased in Q2 and Q4 vs Q1 (OR = 2.99; p = 0.01 and OR = 2.90; p = 0.02). There was also an increased risk of any grade 3 + tox in Q2 vs Q1 (OR = 1.71; p = 0.05). Conclusions: We identified significant gender and age-related differences in EVE trough levels in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for RCC. Furthermore, our analysis identified significant associations between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity.","PeriodicalId":17823,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Cancer","volume":"3 1","pages":"111 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-180049","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-180049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: S0931 is assessing recurrence-free survival in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients randomized to receive everolimus (EVE) versus placebo for one year following nephrectomy. Due to a higher than expected dropout rate, we assessed EVE trough levels in the adjuvant setting to evaluate the relationship between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity. Methods: Patients received 10 mg daily EVE for nine 6-week cycles. Pre-dose whole blood samples were collected pre-cycle 2 and pre-cycle 3 and analyzed for EVE. Patients with pre-cycle 2 and/or pre-cycle 3 EVE results were used in the analysis. Patients were segregated into quartiles (Q) based on EVE levels and logistic regression was used to model the most common adverse event outcomes using EVE trough as a predictor. Hazard and odds ratios were adjusted for age, BMI and performance status. Results: A total of 467 patients were included in this analysis. Quartiles normalized to an EVE dose of 10 mg/day were < 9.0, 9.0–12.9, 12.9–22.8, and > 22.8 ng/mL, respectively. EVE trough levels increased with increasing age (p < 0.001). Furthermore, EVE trough levels were higher in men than women (19.4 versus 15.4 ng/mL, p = 0.01). Risk of grade 2 + triglycerides was increased in Q2 and Q3 vs Q1 (OR = 2.08; p = 0.02 and OR = 2.63; p = 0.002). Risk of grade 2 + rash was increased in Q2 and Q4 vs Q1 (OR = 2.99; p = 0.01 and OR = 2.90; p = 0.02). There was also an increased risk of any grade 3 + tox in Q2 vs Q1 (OR = 1.71; p = 0.05). Conclusions: We identified significant gender and age-related differences in EVE trough levels in patients receiving adjuvant treatment for RCC. Furthermore, our analysis identified significant associations between EVE exposure and probability of toxicity.
依维莫司暴露作为辅助治疗肾细胞癌患者毒性的预测因子:SWOG S0931 (EVEREST)的药代动力学分析结果,一项III期研究(NCT01120249)
背景:S0931正在评估肾细胞癌(RCC)患者在肾切除术后随机接受依维莫司(EVE)和安慰剂治疗一年的无复发生存率。由于退出率高于预期,我们评估了佐剂环境下EVE的低谷水平,以评估EVE暴露与毒性可能性之间的关系。方法:患者接受每日10mg EVE治疗,共9个6周周期。在第2周期和第3周期前采集给药前全血样本,分析EVE。第2周期前和/或第3周期前患者的EVE结果被用于分析。根据EVE水平将患者分为四分位数(Q),并使用逻辑回归对最常见的不良事件结局进行建模,并使用EVE槽作为预测因子。危险比和优势比根据年龄、身体质量指数和表现状况进行调整。结果:共纳入467例患者。按EVE剂量10毫克/天归一化的四分位数分别为22.8纳克/毫升。EVE波谷水平随着年龄的增长而增加(p < 0.001)。此外,男性EVE波谷水平高于女性(19.4 ng/mL vs 15.4 ng/mL, p = 0.01)。与Q1相比,Q2和Q3的2 +级甘油三酯风险增加(OR = 2.08;p = 0.02, OR = 2.63;p = 0.002)。与Q1相比,Q2和Q4出现2 +级皮疹的风险增加(OR = 2.99;p = 0.01, OR = 2.90;p = 0.02)。Q2组与Q1组相比,任何3 +级毒性的风险也增加(OR = 1.71;p = 0.05)。结论:我们发现在接受RCC辅助治疗的患者中EVE谷水平存在显著的性别和年龄相关差异。此外,我们的分析确定了EVE暴露与毒性概率之间的显著关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Cancer
Kidney Cancer Multiple-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信